Keywords
Dayak Ribun;
Ethnic;
Ethnography.
How to Cite
Abstract
This research aims to explore the kinship system of the Dayak Ribun tribe in West Kalimantan. It uses the kinship system tree to visualize the relationship roots. This effort is also based on the refinement of the tree that has existed in the past. Moreover, the method used is an ethnographic approach, where data collection is carried out explicitly using observation, in-depth interviews, and live-in. Ethnic ethnography is gathering a variety of information from its source. According to the results, the kinship system in the Dayak Ribun community is bilateral, that is, relations through two family lineages, both sides of the mother or wife and father or husband. The principle of heredity is bilateral, where the responsibilities of husband and wife are the same in the family, both in children's education and in controlling the family economy. The marriage of a family member who is still a descendant from both the father and the mother is strictly prohibited, which is only allowed to marry between cousins three times. In the distribution of inheritance, there is no difference between sons and daughters. Still, there are differences in some instances, especially for those who remain with their parents. They will get a higher share because they are responsible for their parents' old age until they die.References
Aflanie, I., Prastowo, W., Panghiyangani, R., Yudianto, A., & Koesbardiati, T. (2020). Genetic variation analysis and kinship relationship between Dayak Ngaju tribe and Dayak Bukit tribe through examination of core DNA of Bukit CODIS STR Locus (combine DNA index system) 13 for the purpose of Forensic Identification. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 14(3):1094-1097.
Aini, Y. S., Santoso, N., & Soekmadi, R. (2016). Pengelolaan Tembawang Suku Dayak Iban di Desa Sungai Mawang, Puring Kencana, Kapuas Hulu, Kalimantan Barat. Media Konservasi, 21(2), 99-107.
Alcorn. J. B., & Royo, A. G. (Eds). (2000). Indigenous Social Movements and Ecological Resilience: Lessons from the Dayak of Indonesia. Peoples, Forest and Reefs (PeFoR) Program Discussion Paper Series.
Arkanudin. (2005). Sebuah Penelitian Antropologi, Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Peladang Berpindah. Pontianak: STAIN Press.
Arkanudin, Mashudi, E. Sutandar. (2021). Sacredness of Dayak Ribun Forest: Knowledge, Livelihood and Belief. Scirea Journal of Sociology. 5(5), 277-287. http://www.scirea.org/journal/Sociology
Bakar, A., & Iqbal, I. (2017). Dinamika Kebudayaan Suku Dayak Bakumpai Di Kalimantan Tengah (Studi Tentang Akulturasi Budaya Lokal Dan Agama Islam). Prosiding; Islam and Humanities (Islam and Malay Local Wisdom), 314-329.
Coomans, M. (1987). Manusia Daya, Dahulu, Sekarang dan Masa Depan, Jakarta: Gramedia.
Darmadi, H. (2017). Dayak Asal-Usul dan Penyebarannya di Bumi Borneo (1). Sosial Horizon: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 3(2), 322-340.
Efriani, E., Hasanah, H., & Bayuardi, G. (2020). Kinship of bidayuh dayak ethnic at the border of Entikong-Indonesia and Tebedu-Malaysia. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia, 136-149. Doi: https://doi.org/10.31947/etnosia.v5i1.8300
Fitrianingrum, E. (2018). Analisis Sistem Sapaan Kekerabatan Pada Masyarakat Dayak Kanayatn Bahasa Bangape Desa Antan Kecamatan Ngabang Kabupaten Landak (Kajian Sosiolinguitik). JURNAL KANSASI, 2(2).
Haug, M. (2017). Men, women, and environmental change in Indonesia: The gendered face of development among the Dayak Benuaq. Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies. 10(1), 29-46.
Haviland, W. A. (1988). Antropologi Jilid I dan II (Terjemahan), Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Karyani, L., Nababan, M. R., & Marmanto, S. (2020). Translation Analysis on the Dayak Cultural Terms from Dayak Ngaju to Indonesian and English. Langkawi Journal of the Association for Arabic English. 6(1):41-54. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.31332/ lkw.v6i1.1676
Kedit, P. M. (1988). Ethnicity in Multietnic Society, Dalam: Sarawak Museum Journa;, Vol XL, Desember.
King, V. T. (1978). Revitalization Movement in Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo), Dalam Indonesian Circle 17.
Koentjaraningrat. (1977). Beberapa Pokok-Pokok Antropologi. Jakarta: Dian Rakyat.
Lontaan. (1975). History of customary law and customs of West Kalimantan. Level I Local Government of West Kalimantan. Pontianak.
Miles, D. (1970). The Ngadju Dayaks of Central Kalimantan, with Special Reference to Upper Mentaya. Behavior Science Notes. 4, 291-319.
Mona. (2003). Onok Adak Onok Nusantara. Dalam Kumpulan Diskusi dan Presentasi KEDAI (Kelompok Diskusi Adat Indonesia). Jakarta: International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.
Mudiyono. (1990). Perubahan Sosial dan Ekologi Peladang Berpindah, Pontianak: Dalam Suara Almamater Universitas Tanjungpura, No II Tahun V Nopember 1990.
Mulyoutami, E., Rismawan, R., & Joshi, L. (2009). Local knowledge and management of simpukng (forest gardens) among the Dayak people in East Kalimantan, Indonesia. Forest Ecology and Management. 257:2054-2061. Doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.042
Niko, N. (2020). Gender Struggle: What Can We Learn from the Dayak Benawan Women?. Walailak Journal of Social Science. 13(2):269-292. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/wjss/article/view/234156
Obidzinski, K., Andriani, R., Komarudin, H., & Andrianto, A. (2012). Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. Ecology and Society, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04775-170125
Perda Kabupaten Sanggau Nomor 1 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pengakuan dan Perlindungan Masyarakat Hukum Adat. Retrieved from: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/54925/perda-kab-sanggau-no-1-tahun-2017
Peterianus, S., & Mastiah, M. (2020). Eksistensi Suku Dayak Seberuang Menghadapi Tekanan Modernisasi Melalui Ritual Gawai Dayak. Bestari: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 1(2), 36-43.
Pratiwi, O. H. (2017). Analisis Kontrastif Istilah Kekerabatan Dalam Bahasa Dayak Ngaju, Banjar, Dan Dayak Maanyan. Pada International Seminar “Language Maintenance and Shift” VII, July 2017, Semarang
Riwut, N., & Riwut, N. (2003). Maneser Panatau Tatu Hiang: Menyelami Kekayaan Leluhur. Palangkaraya: Pusakalima.
Sapardi. (1991). Pengaruh Perkebunan Inti Rakyat Terhadap Rumah Tangga Petani di Kecamatan Parindu, Tesis, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Indonesia.
Setyawan, A. D. W. I. (2010). Biodiversity conservation strategy in a native perspective; case study of shifting cultivation at the Dayaks of Kalimantan. Nusantara Bioscience, 2(2), 97–108. https://doi.org/10.13057/nusbiosci/n020208
Situmeang, S. R., Budhi, S., & Uddin, J. (2020). Establishment of Institutions and Empowerment of Dayak Tradition (Study in Murung Raya District). Scholar International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice. 3(6):161-165. Doi: 10.36348/sijlcj.2020.v03i06.002
Suparlan, P. (1989). Sistem Kekerbatan, Keluarga, dan Peranan Pria dalam Keturunan, Dalam: berita Antropologi, Nomor 46 Tahun XIII, April – Juni
Sutama, P., Luardini, M. A., & Asi, N. (2020). The Religious Text ‘Panaturan’ of the Dayak Ngaju Community. Solec International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture. KnE Social Sciences, 247–254. DOI 10.18502/kss.v4i4.6489.
White, B., & White, J. (2011). The gendered politics of dispossession : oil palm expansion in a Dayak Hibun community in West Kalimantan, Indonesia Global Land Grabbing. International Conference on Global Land Grabbing 6-8 April 2011.
Zulkarnaen. (2000). Hubungan Birokrasi Pemerintahan dan Lembaga Adat Dalam pembangunan, Suatu Pola Kerjasama Birokrasi Pemerintah dengan Lembaga Adat Dalam Implementasi Program Pembangunan pada Masyarakat Dayak Kalimantan Barat. Bandung: Disertasi Doktor, Program Pascasarjana UNPAD.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 ETNOSIA : Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia