JURNAL GEOCELEBES http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/geocelebes <p>Jurnal Geocelebes is a peer-reviewed and scientific journal published which is intended as a means of scientific publication in the field of geophysics ranging from theoretical topics to the topic topics of geophysical applications in various fields. The published papers are original research results, reviews of recent advances from a particular topic, geophysical application case studies or reviews of geophysical-related software.</p> <p>Jurnal Geocelebes is published twice a year in April and October by the Department of Geophysics, Hasanuddin University, Indonesia.</p> <p>Authors are invited to submit manuscripts that fall within the scope of the Jurnal Geocelebes. Please read the information on the <a href="https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/geocelebes/focusandscope" target="_blank" rel="noopener">Focus and Scope</a>. The articles published in Jurnal Geocelebes are going through a double-blind peer-review process. Hence, the decision on whether the scientific article is accepted or not, will be the Editorial Board’s right based on the peer reviewer's recommendation.</p> <p>Please read and understand the author's guidelines for the preparation manuscript. The author who submits a manuscript to the editors should comply with the author's guidelines and <a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SJXd8YkFRdkA8Okx9f-BB_zm8M4rxrik/edit?usp=share_link&amp;ouid=105472877138572928349&amp;rtpof=true&amp;sd=true" target="_blank" rel="noopener">template</a>. If the submitted manuscript does not comply with the guidelines or using a different format, it will be rejected by the editorial team before being reviewed. The editorial team will only accept a manuscript that meets the specified formatting requirements.</p> Departemen Geofisika, FMIPA - Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar en-US JURNAL GEOCELEBES 2579-5821 <p><span>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</span></p><ol type="a"><li>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a&nbsp;<a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution License</a>&nbsp;that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</li><li>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</li><li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See&nbsp;<a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</li></ol> Investigation of Sediment Layer Thickness Estimation at Bengkulu University Hospital Based on Microtremor Data http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/geocelebes/article/view/28144 <p>Bengkulu is the capital of Bengkulu Province and is located in the subduction zone between the Eurasian and Indo-Australian plates. Bengkulu is also close to the major faults of Sumatra, namely the Musi fault, the Ketahun fault, and the Manna fault. Therefore, regional planning and infrastructure development for earthquake mitigation is necessary. The purpose of this study is to estimate the thickness of the sedimentary layers in the construction zone of Bengkulu Hospital during the earthquake attenuation phase. This study is conducted by surface geological analysis using the HVSR method; data analysis using microtremor data. The microtremor data were analyzed using the HVSR method to obtain the amplification value (A<sub>0</sub>) and the dominant frequency (f<sub>0</sub>). HVSR analysis gave dominant frequency (f<sub>0</sub>) values from 5.1 to 5.8 Hz, amplification (A<sub>0</sub>) from 1.64 to 5.91 times, and dominant period (T<sub>0</sub>) from 1.49 to 2.81 seconds. The values of A<sub>0</sub>, f<sub>0</sub>, T<sub>0</sub> are interpreted with reference to the literature and surface geology as a moderate risk of seismic vulnerability, characterized by moderate to weak sedimentation and moderate amplification values.</p> Andre Rahmat Al Ansory Hana Raihana M Farid Arif Ismul Hadi Copyright (c) 2023 JURNAL GEOCELEBES 2024-04-01 2024-04-01 1 10 10.20956/geocelebes.v8i1.28144 2D Marine Seismic data Analysis Using Comparison of Kirchhoff’s Migration Method and Finite Difference Method (Case Study: Nias Basin, North Sumatera) http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/geocelebes/article/view/24638 <p>Seismic migration is one of the important stages in seismic data processing which aims to map seismic events to their actual positions. The migration process used in this study is post-stack time migration in the time domain using the Kirchhoff migration technique and the finite difference method to determine the results of subsurface imaging from the two migration techniques and then compare them to determine the accuracy of selecting the appropriate migration for the L08 basin trajectory research area. Nias basin, North Sumatra. The processing steps are carried out according to the preprocessing to processing stages in the Promax 5000 software. Based on the results of the study, the optimum use of aperture migration in Kirchhoff migration will produce good subsurface cross-sectional imaging. The aperture value used is 3000 ms. In the finite difference migration, subsurface imaging is much more focused with a time step variation of 10 ms, whose function is to focus the hyperbolic diffraction energy on the migration data.</p> Cindy Fatika Nur Annisa Muliadi Muliadi Okto Ivansyah Subarsyah Subarsyah Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL GEOCELEBES 2024-04-01 2024-04-01 11 25 10.20956/geocelebes.v8i1.24638 Genesis of Bauxite Ore in Toba Area Sanggau District, West Kalimantan Province http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/geocelebes/article/view/26521 <p>Indonesia's largest bauxite reserves are in the province of West Kalimantan, which is 703 million tons Bauxite is formed from rocks with a high relative aluminum (Al) content, low iron (Fe) content, and small amount of quartz. The mineralogy and characteristics of lateritic bauxite deposits are closely related to several factors, one of which is the texture and composition of the bedrock such as color, mineral composition, and shape of the ore. This study discusses the genetic type of bauxite deposits based on mineralogy and geochemistry using mineragraphic, XRD, and XRF methods. The primary data from bauxite ore samples were collected from the stockpile of PT. Dinamika Sejahtera located in Toba area. The quantitative result of the geochemical analysis indicates a higher amount of alumina observed using the XRF method. Granodiorite bauxite, which is bauxite coming from granodiorite bedrock, generally has abundant geochemical elements, especially SiO2 and Al2O3. The lateritic bauxite type in the Toba area is a product of granodiorite weathering from the Sepauk Tonalite formation is embedded within a clay matrix which exhibits a brownish to red color with coarse to boulder-size of concretion texture without relict. Some important elements in bauxite laterite deposits are Al, Fe, Si (Silicon), and Ti (Titanium). The comparison between Al and Si values is a benchmark for the economics of bauxite mines. Gibbsite is the major mineral in the bauxite ore, while hematite, goethite, kaolinite, and quartz are the accessory minerals. The deposit is recognized as Low-Fe bauxite due to comparing Al2O3, Fe2O3, and Si2O3 concentrations. The weathering process has altered the primary texture, remaining resistant and secondary minerals. The petrographic analysis shows the replacement of Gibbsite as bauxite ore which presents as kaolinite replacement and fills the mineral cracks. The result of this study is expected to be useful in determining the exploration method for the bauxite deposits.</p> Ricka Aprillia Wahdaniah Mukhtar Septami Setiawati Govira Christiadora Asbanu Ibnu Munzir Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL GEOCELEBES 2024-04-01 2024-04-01 26 36 10.20956/geocelebes.v8i1.26521 Subsurface Interpretation of the Panjang Fault Area, Lampung, Based on Geomagnetic Method http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/geocelebes/article/view/28303 <p>Research on the area along the Panjang Fault - Lampung, the area from the Teluk Betung to Tanjung Karang Barat area using the 19-T GSM PPM tool with base rover acquisition on 2 tracks 2 kilometers apart obtained 40 acquisition points with a spacing of 0.3 kilometers. This study aims to determine the type of lithology and subsurface rock structure by utilizing the susceptibility value of rocks from magnetic anomalies. In the process of processing magnetic anomaly data, upward continuation is carried out as high as 350 m which is intended to reduce the total anomaly with the upward anomaly results so that a residual anomaly is obtained. Next, make a 2D subsurface model on the incision A - B in the residual anomaly map. Based on the results of qualitative interpretation, the total magnetic anomaly of the research area illustrates positive to negative anomaly values with a tighter contour pattern that indicates the presence of a fault structure. While based on quantitative interpretation, the 2D modeling in incision A - B shows a susceptibility value of 0.100 cgs which can be identified as breccia tuff rock, a susceptibility value of 0.0391 cgs is thought to be rhyolitic tuff rock, pumice tuff rock, and sandstone tuff, and a susceptibility value of 0.150 cgs is a rock from the intrusion of Mount Betung in the form of andesite-basalt lava. In addition, rocks with a susceptibility value of 0.0024 cgs are metamorphic rocks. The correlation between 2D modeling and regional geology is seen in the research area, which is in the Tarahan Formation (Tpot), which is suspected to be a fault structure in the Bumi Waras area with a strike direction of NW - SE which is the course of geothermal manifestations or minerals.</p> Syamsurijal Rasimeng Fahruddin Fahruddin Ferdio Valentin Theressia Githa Aurora Jesica Nurlaili Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL GEOCELEBES 2024-04-01 2024-04-01 37 – 50 37 – 50 10.20956/geocelebes.v8i1.28303 Analysis of Ground Vibration Levels Due to the Blasting Process at PT. Bumi Suksesindo http://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/geocelebes/article/view/32853 <p>Ground vibration is one of the effects of the blasting process; when the ground vibration reaches the highest level, it will disturb comfort and even cause damage to the surrounding building structure. This research aims to determine the magnitude of ground vibrations in Pit A and Pit C, as well as determine the relationship between Peak Particle Velocity (PPV) and scaled Distance, and determine the maximum explosive charge weight per delay based on the SNI 7571: 2010 reference. Actual ground vibration measurement data during research based on PPV theory and the actual PPV power regression relationship with scaled distance was used to obtain a ground vibration prediction formula to be a reference for determining the amount of explosive filling per delay. The ground vibration produced in the blasting process is hoped not to exceed the safe threshold. Prediction of the ground vibration formula at 100 m to 1500 m according to the US Bureau of Mines where the Mean Squared Error (MSE) value is 0.54, the MSE value from the Langefors-Kihlstrom equation is 1.85 while the MSE value from the Ambersays-Hendorn equation is 0.31 with the slightest deviation is very good to use as a reference for predicting ground vibrations with the predicted PPV formula. Hence, the maximum explosive charge with a PPV limit of 2 mm/s is 2.452 kg, a PPV limit of 3 mm/s is 11.332 kg, and a PPV limit of 5 mm/s is 23.040 kg. The factors that influence ground vibration are the Distance from the blasting location to the measurement location and the maximum number of explosives per delay, so the results taken from this research are that blasting in Pit A and Pit C is still categorized as safe for infrastructure and community housing.</p> Nofry Hence Tarumasely Novandri Kusuma Wardana Rizqi Prastowo Copyright (c) 2024 JURNAL GEOCELEBES 2024-04-03 2024-04-03 51 – 61 51 – 61 10.20956/geocelebes.v8i1.32853