An Exploration of the Factors Influencing the Use of Politeness Strategies in the EFL Classroom
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.34050/els-jish.v8i2.44517Keywords:
politeness strategies, Pragmatics, Classroom InteractionAbstract
Politeness plays a vital role in social interaction, as it reflects cultural norms, social relationships, and the speaker’s communicative intentions. This study aims to explore and analyze the factors that influence the use of politeness strategies in both spoken and written forms of communication. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, with data collected through observations, interviews, and document analysis across various communicative settings, The findings indicate that several key elements such as social status, interpersonal distance, The researcher also found the factors that influence the use of politeness strategies based on Brown and Levinson’s theory. They are pay-off in 10 times and relevant circumstances in 6 times (social distance in 1 time, relative power in 5 times). Pay-off was the highest of the factor that influence the use of politeness strategies. These insights are expected to support the development of pragmatic theory and foster greater awareness of polite language use in diverse communicative contexts.
References
Aswad, M., Rahman, F., Said, I. M., Hamuddin, B., & Nurchalis, N. F. (2019). A software to increase English learning outcomes: An acceleration model of English as the second language. The Asian EFL Journal, 26(6.2), 157.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Gratton, C. I. (2004). Research of Method for Sport Studies. London & New York: Routledge.
Hasnia, H., Andini, C., Tahir, M. D., Hunaeni, H., Zulfikariandi, Z., & MT, M. (2022). The Ability of 1st Class Students of SMAN 11 Enrekang to Arrange Verbal and Nominal Sentences. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 5(3), 539-550.
Hennink, M. I. (2020). Qualitative Research Methods. New Delhi: SAGE.
Holmes, J. (1995). Women, men and politeness. Longman.
Ide, S. (1989). Formal forms and discernment: Two neglected aspects of universals of linguistic politeness. Multilingua, 8(2–3), 223–248.
Ivankova, N. V., & Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed methods. Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A practical introduction, 23, 135-161.
Kasper, G., & Blum-Kulka, S. (1993). Interlanguage pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
Mahmud, M. (2017). Doing Discourse Analysis: An Introduction. Yogyakarta: Phoenix Publisher.
Miles, B. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook 2nd Edition. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2013). An exploratory study of politeness strategies in teacher–student interaction. Language Awareness, 22(4), 243–260.
Oviogun, P. V., & Veerdee, P. S. (2020). Definition of language and linguistics: basic competence. Macrolinguistics and Microlinguistics, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21744/mami.v1n1.1
Peng, L., Xie, F., & Cai, L. (2014). A case study of college teacher’s politeness strategy in EFL classroom. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(1), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.4.1.110-115
Rahman, F., Abbas, A., Hasyim, M., Rahman, F., Abbas, A., & Hasyim, M. (2019). Facebook group as media of learning writing in ESP context: A case study at Hasanuddin University. Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 26(6.1), 153-167.
Rahman, F., & Weda, S. (2019). Linguistic deviation and the rhetoric figures in Shakespeare’s selected plays. XLinguage" European Scientific Language Journal", 12(1), 37-52.
Rahman, F., & Weda, S. (2018). Students’ perceptions in appreciating English literary works through critical comment: A case study at Hasanuddin University and Universitas Negeri Makassar. Asian EFL Journal, 20(3), 149-172.
Reyes, T. (2005). Qualitative Video Analysis Applied to Classroom Studies-A first Steps Workshop. In F. Hans, Developing Standards in Research on Science Education; The ESERA Summer School 2004 (p. 39). London: Taylor and Francis Group
Sabila, A. S., Anjani, S. D., & Sosrohadi, S. (2025). Semiotic Analysis of Local Cultural Representation and Fingerprint Painting Authenticity on Indonesiana TV's YouTube Channel. ELS Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 8(1), 133-142.
Said, M. M., Rita, F., Weda, S., & Rahman, F. (2021). English Language Performance Development Through Extracurricular Activities At Faculty Of Teacher Training And Education Tadulako University Palu. PalArch's Journal of Archaelogy of Egypt/Egyptology.
Sullivan, E. L. (2009). The SAGE Glossary of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. London: SAGE Publication Ltd.
Tiwari, D. T. (2021 ). Classroom Interaction in Communicative Language Teaching of Public Secondary Schools in Nepal. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 373.
Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 91–112.
Wallace, D. P., & Van Fleet, C. (1998). Qualitative research and the editorial tradition: A mixed metaphor.
Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.
Weda, S., Atmowardoyo, H., Rahman, F., Said, M. M., & Herman, H. (2022). Lecturers’ perception of online learning and its associated factors in the midst of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Social Sciences, 5(1), 112–131.
Yaumi, M. T. A. H., Rahman, F., & Sahib, H. (2023). Exploring WhatsApp as Teaching and Learning Activities during Covid-19/New Normal era: A Semiotic Technology Analysis. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(12), 7627-7634.
Youngsun, K., Sosrohadi, S., Andini, C., Adinda, R., Jae, P. K., Yookyung, K., & Jung, S. (2024). Beyond the Korean Wave: Understanding the Motivation of Among Indonesian Gen Z to Learn Korean in the K-Pop Trend. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 7(06).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Sutyrajmi, Murni Mahmud, Sukardi Weda

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.