INSTITUSIONALISASI PARTAI POLITK: STUDI KASUS HEGEMONI PAN DI SULAWESI TENGGARA

Authors

  • Eka Suaib Ilmu Politik FISIP Universitas Halu Oleo
  • La Husen Zuada Ilmu Politik FISIP Universitas Halu Oleo
  • I Wayan Gde Suacana Studi Pemerintahan FISIPOL Universitas Warmadewa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31947/politics.v2i1.1655

Keywords:

Institusionalization Political Party, Patronage, Political Program

Abstract

Focus articles namely institusionalizationpolitical party with case study PAN Southeast Sulawesi.Although nationally PAN occupy a board the middle , but in Southeast Sulawesi occupy the top.Hegemony PANSoutheast Sulawesi seen in the seats at an election 2004,2009, 2014 and the fight for regional head election (Pilkada) carried out the period 2010-2013.It was just that , hegemony PAN did not come from institusionalization politicalparty but based on the power of personal. The beginning formation of the process ofinstitusionalization in line with onthe track , but in the following development this process is not workingbecause of the emergence of a strong personalize them in the body of internal pan namely Nur Alam.The figure of this is so strong so as to create patronage both in internal party and exit.To create a voter loyalty, then introduced the program BAHTERAMAS which included the types of programmatic goods.As a result, PAN experienced a dilemma because the process institusionalization politicalparty did not function as intended and program design is not sustainable. Strengthening personalize them in the body party because institusionalizationof the weak. This situation should anticipated by the party, if the party rely on the strength of figure, when he has no base material and resources strong , but political parties will also weakened.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aspinal, Edward. 2014. “When Brokers Betray: Clientalism, Social Networks, and Electoral Politics in Indonesia”, Critical Asian Studies 46, no. 4.

Amal, Ichasul, 1988. Teori-teori Mutahir Partai Politik, Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.

Berg, Bruce Lawrence. 2001. Qualitative Research Methods for theSocial Sciences. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Budiardjo, Miriam. 2003. Dasar-dasar Ilmu Politik.Jakatrta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Corry, J.A. dan Abraham, Hendry. J.1984.‘Elements of Democratic Government, dalam Haryanto, Partai Politik Suatu Tinjauan Umum, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Dix, Robert. 1992. ‘Political Parties Democratization and the Institutionalization of Latin American’. Comparative Political Studies 24,4.

Dokumen PAN.1998.Maklumat PANdiambil darihttps://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pan.

Geddes, Barbara. 1994. Politician’s Dilemma: Building State Capacity in Latin America. University of California Press.

Huntington , Samuel P. 2004.Tertib Politik pada Masyarakat yang Sedang Berubah, (terj.), Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

Hutrchcroft, Raul. 2014. ‘Linking Capital and Countryside:Patronage and Clientalism in Japan, Thailand and The Philpinas’, dalam Clientalism, Social Policyand the Quality of Democracy, diedit oleh Diego Abente Brun dan Larry Diamond, Baltimore: Jhon Hapkins University Press.

Imawan, Riswandha. 2005. ‘Partai Politik di Indonesia: Pergulatan Setengah Hati Mencari Jati Diri’, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar, Yogyakarta: Fisipol UGM.

Janda , Kenneth. 1980. Political Parties: A Cross National Survey, London: Macmillan.

Kambo, Gustiana A., dan Achmad Zulfikar. 2015. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pilkada Serentak. Makassar: Program Studi Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin.

Kuntowijoyo. 2006. Raja, Priyayi, Kawula. Yogyakarta: Ombak

Katz, Richard. 2014. ‘The Internal Life of Parties’, Party Politics, Vol. 10, No. 6, p. 701-22.

Maunwaring, Scot. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Migdal, Joel. 1988.Strong Societies and Weak States : State-Society Relations and State Capabilities in the Third World. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press.

Nursal, Adman. 2004.Political Marketing: Strategi Memenangkan Pemilu. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Panebianco, Angelo.1988. Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Randall, Vicky dan Svasand, Lars.2015. ‘Party Institutionalization in New Democracies’. Jurnal Party Politics, Vol. 8, no 1. Januaridiambil dari http://www.yorku.ca/../Party%20Politics%20vol%208%Randall%20and%200.

Sartori, Giovanni. 1984. Parties and Party Systems a Framework for Analisis.New York: Cambridge University Press.

Suaib, Eka dan Zuada, La Husen. 2015. ‘Fenomena ‘Bosisme Lokal’ di Era Desentralisasi: Studi Hegemoni Politik Nur Alam di Sulawesi Tenggara’.Jurnal Penelitian Politik, Vol. 12, No.2, Desember 2015.hal. 51-69, Jakarta: LIPI.

Subhan, Ahmad. 2015. Pergulatan dalam Proses Pelembagaan Partai Politik di Tingkat Lokal.Diambil dari http://www.academia.edu/.../Pergulatan_dala.

Strauss,Anselm dan J. Corbin. 2009.Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Kualitatif, Tata Langkah dan Teoritisasi Data. Jakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Torcal, Mariano; Gunther, Richard; dan Montero, (2002). ‘Anti-Party Sentiments in Southertn Europe’. In Richard P. Guntehr, Jose Ramon Montero, and Juan J.Linz (Eds..). Political Parties: Old Concepts and New Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yin, Robert K. 2006.Studi Kasus Desain dan Metode.Jakarta: PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Yuda, Hanta. (2015). Potret Institusionalisasi Partai Politik Indonesia: Dinamika, Karakter, dan Prospek Pasca Pemilu 2009,diambil dari http://www.poltracking.com/.../577-buku-bagian-ketiga.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-10

How to Cite

Suaib, E., Zuada, L. H., & Suacana, I. W. G. (2017). INSTITUSIONALISASI PARTAI POLITK: STUDI KASUS HEGEMONI PAN DI SULAWESI TENGGARA. The Politics : Jurnal Magister Ilmu Politik Universitas Hasanuddin, 2(1), 39-55. https://doi.org/10.31947/politics.v2i1.1655

Issue

Section

Articles