Perbandingan Performa MSGARCH, LSTM, dan Hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM pada Peramalan Data Deret Waktu yang Mengandung Heteroskedastisitas

Authors

  • Wa Ode Rona Freya IPB University
  • Kusman Sadik IPB University
  • Budi Susetyo IPB University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20956/ejsa.v7i1.45934

Keywords:

Time Series, Volatility, MSGARCH, LSTM, Data Simulation, Bitcoin

Abstract

Volatility forecasting is crucial for estimating potential portfolio losses, particularly in cryptocurrency markets like Bitcoin, which exhibit high and irregular price fluctuations. Models from the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity (GARCH) family, including Markov Switching GARCH (MSGARCH), are widely used to handle heteroscedastic data and capture regime changes. Meanwhile, Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) is effective for modeling nonlinear and complex patterns in financial time series. This study proposes a hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM model by incorporating MSGARCH predictions as additional input to the LSTM. The model is evaluated using simulated data resembling Bitcoin's characteristics, with Heteroscedasticity Mean Absolute Error (HMAE) as the primary metric, and analyzed using ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test. The results identify four superior hybrid configurations, all of which significantly outperform the standalone MSGARCH and LSTM models. Based on the characteristics of Bitcoin data, the MSGARCH (2-regime with sged error distribution)-LSTM model is selected for empirical analysis. This model achieved an HMAE of 0.3197 and an HMSE of 0.2088, with accuracy improvements of 61.20% and 83.50% compared to the standalone MSGARCH model. These findings indicate that the hybrid MSGARCH-LSTM model improves volatility forecasting accuracy in highly volatile cryptocurrency markets.

References

Andersen, T. G., Bollerslev, T., Christoffersen, P. F., & Diebold, F. X. Volatility and Correlation Forecasting. Handbook of Volatility Forecasting, 1, 777–878, 2006.

Kumar, P. H., & Patil, S. B. Volatility Forecasting: A Performance Measure of GARCH Techniques with Different Distribution Models. International Journal of Soft Computing, Mathematics and Control, 5(2–3), 1–14, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14810/ijscmc.2016.5301

Candra, F. L. A. Perbandingan Kinerja Model GARCH dan Copula-GARCH untuk Pendugaan Value at Risk pada Bitcoin dan Ethereum. Tesis, Institut Pertanian Bogor, 2025.

Maingo, I., Ravele, T., & Sigauke, C. Volatility Modelling of the Johannesburg Stock Exchange All Share Index Using the Family GARCH Model. Forecasting, 7(2), 16, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/forecast7020016

Akgun, O. B., & Gulay, E. Dynamics in Realized Volatility Forecasting: Evaluating GARCH Models and Deep Learning Algorithms Across Parameter Variations. Computational Economics, 65(6), 3971–4013, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10694-2

Shiferaw, Y. A. An Analysis of East African Tea Crop Prices Using the MCMC Approach to Estimate Volatility and Forecast the In-Sample Value-at-Risk. Scientific African, 19, e01442, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2022.e01442

Ardia, D., Bluteau, K., Boudt, K., Catania, L., & Trottier, D. A. Markov-Switching GARCH Models in R: The MSGARCH Package. Journal of Statistical Software, 91(4), 2019. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i04

Caporale, G. M., & Zekokh, T. Modelling Volatility of Cryptocurrencies Using Markov-Switching GARCH Models. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 143–155, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.12.009

Zahid, M., Iqbal, F., & Koutmos, D. Forecasting Bitcoin Volatility Using Hybrid GARCH Models with Machine Learning. Risks, 10(12), 237, 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10120237

Manogna, R. L., Dharmaji, V., & Sarang, S. A Novel Hybrid Neural Network-Based Volatility Forecasting of Agricultural Commodity Prices: Empirical Evidence from India. Journal of Big Data, 12(1), 2025. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01131-8

Bollerslev, T. Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics, 31, 307–327, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(86)90063-1

Ampadu, S., Mensah, E. T., Aidoo, E. N., Boateng, A., & Maposa, D. A Comparative Study of Error Distributions in the GARCH Model Through a Monte Carlo Simulation Approach. Scientific African, 23, e01988, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2023.e01988

Hamilton, J. D. A New Approach to the Economic Analysis of Nonstationary Time Series and the Business Cycle. Econometrica, 57(2), 357–384, 1989. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912559

Cai, J. Markov Model of Switching-Regime ARCH. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 12(3), 309–316, 1994. https://doi.org/10.2307/1392087

Hamilton, J. D., & Susmel, R. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity and Changes in Regime. Journal of Econometrics, 64(1–2), 307–333, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)90067-1

Kim, H. Y., & Won, C. H. Forecasting the Volatility of Stock Price Index: A Hybrid Model Integrating LSTM with Multiple GARCH-Type Models. Expert Systems with Applications, 103, 25–37, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2018.03.002

Molnar, P. Properties of Range-Based Volatility Estimators. International Review of Financial Analysis, 23, 20–29, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2011.06.012

Floros, C., Gkillas, K., Konstantatos, C., & Tsaganos, A. Realized Measures to Explain Volatility Changes over Time. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(6), 2020. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13060125

Ardia, D., Bluteau, K., & Ruede, M. Regime Changes in Bitcoin GARCH Volatility Dynamics. Finance Research Letters, 29, 266–271, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.08.009

Alabdulwahab, S., Kim, Y. T., & Son, Y. Privacy-Preserving Synthetic Data Generation Method for IoT-Sensor Network IDS Using CTGAN. Sensors, 24(22), 2024. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24227389

Wobbrock, J. O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., & Higgins, J. J. The Aligned Rank Transform for Nonparametric Factorial Analysis Using Only ANOVA Procedures. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011), 2011. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05