Comparative Accuracy of Satellite-Derived Bathymetry Using Random Forest, Multiple Linear Regression, and Van Hengel and Spitzer Algorithm

Authors

  • Fathurrahman Apriliansyah Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure and Regional Technology, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung 35365, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Ulin Nuha Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure and Regional Technology, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung 35365, Indonesia
  • Aulia Try Atmojo Geomatics Engineering, Faculty of Infrastructure and Regional Technology, Institut Teknologi Sumatera, Lampung 35365, Indonesia
  • Kuncoro Teguh Setiawan Research Center for Geoinformatics, National Research and Innovation Agency, Cibinong 16911, Indonesia.
  • Aswar Syafnur Geophysics Department, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Hasanuddin University, Makassar 90245, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70561/geocelebes.v10i1.43582

Keywords:

Multiple Linear Regression, Random Forest, Satellite-Derived Bathymetry, Van Hengel and Spitzer Algorithm

Abstract

Bathymetry mapping using conventional methods faces limitations in shallow waters. With the development of remote sensing technology, satellite-derived bathymetry (SDB) emerges as an alternative by utilizing wavelengths that penetrate water and capture depth information. This study compares the performance of three empirical SDB methods: Random Forest (RF), Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), and the Van Hengel and Spitzer (VHS) algorithm. SPOT 6 ORTHO-level satellite imagery and depth data from single beam echosounder measurements were used to construct the depth models. Model accuracy was evaluated using root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and total vertical uncertainty (TVU). Results show that the RF method achieves the highest accuracy across most depth ranges (1–5 m, 5–10 m, and 10–15 m), while the VHS algorithm performs best at 0–1 m. At depths beyond 15 meters, MLR shows relatively better performance compared to other methods, although overall uncertainty remains high. Based on the coefficient of determination (R2), RF achieves the best result with a value of 0.610, followed by MLR with 0.462, and VHS with 0.313. These findings highlight the superior adaptability of the RF method in estimating bathymetry across varying depth zones using optical satellite imagery.

References

Ashphaq, M., Srivastava, P. K., & Mitra, D. (2024). Satellite ‐ Derived Bathymetry in Dynamic Coastal Geomorphological Environments Through Machine. Earth and Space Science, 11(7), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1029/2024EA003554

BIG. (2021). Peraturan Badan Informasi Geospasial Republik Indonesia Nomor 18 Tahun 2021 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelenggaraan Informasi Geospasial. Badan Informasi Geospasial. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/217091/peraturan-big-no-18-tahun-2021

Bramante, J. F., Raju, D. K., & Sin, T. M. (2013). Multispectral derivation of bathymetry in Singapore’s shallow, turbid waters. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 34(6), 2070–2088. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2012.734934

Caballero, I., & Stumpf, R. P. (2019). Preliminary Assessment of Turbidity and Chlorophyll Impact on Bathymetry Derived from Sentinel-2A and Sentinel-3A Satellites in South Florida. Remote Sensing, 11(6), 645. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11060645

Caballero, I., & Stumpf, R. P. (2020a). Atmospheric correction for satellite-derived bathymetry in the Caribbean waters : from a single image to multi-temporal approaches using Sentinel-2A/B. Optics Express, 28(8), 11742–11766. https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.390316

Caballero, I., & Stumpf, R. P. (2020b). Towards Routine Mapping of Shallow Bathymetry in Environments with Variable Turbidity : Contribution of Sentinel-2A/B Satellites Mission. Remote Sensing, 12(3), 451. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12030451

Cahalane, C., Magee, A., Monteys, X., Casal, G., Hanafin, J., & Harris, P. (2019). A comparison of Landsat 8, RapidEye and Pleiades products for improving empirical predictions of satellite-derived bathymetry. Remote Sensing of Environment, 233, 111414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111414

Chybicki, A., Sosnowski, P., Kulawiak, M., Bieliński, T., Korlub, W., Łubniewski, Z., Kempa, M., & Parzuchowski, J. (2023). Study of various machine learning approaches for Sentinel-2 derived bathymetry. PLoS ONE, 18(9), e0291595. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0291595

Dewi, R. S., & Rizaldy, A. (2021). Accuracy Assessment of Satellite Derived Bathymetry Model for Depth Extraction in Sorong Shallow Water Area Accuracy Assessment of Satellite Derived Bathymetry Model for Depth Extraction in Sorong Shallow Water Area. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 925, 012053. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/925/1/012053

Dewi, R. S., Rizaldy, A., Hartanto, P., & Suprajaka, S. (2021). Assesing The Accuracy of Shallow Water Depth Estimation by Using Multispectral Satellite Images. Geographia Technica, 16(Special Issue), 180–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.21163/GT_2021.163.14

Evagorou, E., Mettas, C., Agapiou, A., Themistocleous, K., & Hadjimitsis, D. (2019). Bathymetric maps from multi-temporal analysis of Sentinel-2 data: the case study of Limassol, Cyprus. Advances in Geosciences, 45, 397–407, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-397-2019

Fang, S., Wu, Z., Wu, S., Chen, Z., Shen, W., & Mao, Z. (2024). Enhancing Water depth inversion accuracy in turbid coastal environments using random forest and coordinate attention mechanisms. Frontiers in Marine Science, 11, 1471695. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2024.1471695

Gao, J. (2009). Bathymetric mapping by means of remote sensing: Methods, accuracy and limitations. Progress in Physical Geography, 33(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309105657

Hodson, T. O. (2022). Root-mean-square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE): when to use them or not. Geoscientific Model Development, 15, 5481–5487. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-15-5481-2022

Hu, Q., Li, J., & Cheng, L. (2025). Satellite-derived bathymetry based on iterative fusion of active lidar photons and passive pseudo- photons. International Journal of Digital Earth, 18(1), 2543568. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2025.2543568

IHO. (2020). International Hydrographic Organization Standards for Hydrographic Surveys. 377.

IHO. (2024). International Hydrographic Organization Guidance to Satellite-Derived Bathymetry © Copyright International Hydrographic Organization 2024. 377.

Kim, M., Danielson, J., Storlazzi, C., & Park, S. (2024). Physics-Based Satellite-Derived Bathymetry (SDB) Using Landsat OLI Images. Remote Sensing, 16(5), 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16050843

Kwon, J-Y., Shin, H-K., Kim, D-H., Lee, H-G., Bouk, J-K., Kim, J-H., & Kim, T-H. (2024). Estimation of shallow bathymetry using Sentinel-2 satellite data and random forest machine learning : a case study for Cheonsuman, Hallim, and Samcheok Coastal Seas. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing, 18(1), 014522. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JRS.18.014522

Lee, S-J., Kim, H-S., Yun, H-S., & Lee, S-H. (2025). Satellite-Derived Bathymetry Using Sentinel-2 and Airborne Hyperspectral Data : A Deep Learning Approach with Adaptive Interpolation. Remote Sensing, 17(15), 2594. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17152594

Liu, Z., Liu, H., Ma, Y., Ma, X., Yang, J., Jiang, Y., & Li, S. (2024). Exploring the Most Effective Information for Satellite-Derived Bathymetry Models in Different Water Qualities. Remote Sensing, 16(13), 2371. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16132371

Lyzenga, D. R. (1978). Passive remote sensing techniques for mapping water depth and bottom features. Applied Optics, 17(3), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.17.000379

Mabula, M. J., Kisanga, D., & Pamba, S. (2023). Application of machine learning algorithms and Sentinel-2 satellite for improved bathymetry retrieval in Lake Victoria, Tanzania. Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science, 26(3), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2023.07.003

Manessa, M. D. M., Kanno, A., Sekine, M., Haidar, M., Yamamoto, K., Imai, T., & Higuchi, T. (2016). Satellite-Derived Bathymetry Using Random Forest Algorithm and Worldview-2 Imagery. Geoplanning: Journal of Geomatics and Planning, 3(2), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.14710/geoplanning.3.2.117-126

Mudiyanselage, S. S. J. D., Wilkinson, B., & Lecours, V. (2022). Satellite-derived bathymetry using machine learning and optimal Sentinel-2 imagery in South- West Florida coastal waters. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 59(1), 1143–1158. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2022.2100597

Munawaroh, M., Wicaksono, P., Farda, N. M., Lumban-Gaol, Y., Khakhim, N., & Kamal, M. (2024). Performance test of clean-coastal-water composite sentinel 2A image for shallow water bathymetry mapping. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment, 35, 101212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2024.101212

Nisa, S. Q., Karang, I. W. G. A., Putra, I. D. N. N., Setiawan, K. T., & Aziz, K. (2023). Perbandingan Akurasi Metode Empiris untuk Pemetaan Batimetri Perairan Benoa, Bali, Menggunakan Citra Satelit SPOT. Journal of Marine Research and Technology, 6(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmrt.2023.v06.i01.p09

Nugraha, A. Y., Prayudha, B., Ibrahim, A. L., & Riyadi, N. (2017). Pemetaan Batimetri di Perairan Dangkal menggunakan Data Penginderaan Jauh Spot-7 (Studi Kasus Lembar-Lombok). Jurnal Chart Datum, 3(2), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.37875/chartdatum.v3i2.120

Pahlevan, N., Sarkar, S., Franz, B. A., Balasubramanian, S. V, & He, J. (2017). Remote Sensing of Environment Sentinel-2 MultiSpectral Instrument (MSI) data processing for aquatic science applications: Demonstrations and validations. Remote Sensing of Environment, 201, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.08.033

Prasetya, M. I., Siregar, V. P., & Agus, S. B. (2023). Comparison of Satellite-Derived Bathymetry Algorithm Accuracy Using Sentinel-2 Multispectral Satellite Image. Jurnal Kelautan Tropis, 26(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkt.v26i1.16050

Purkis, S. J. (2019). Remote Sensing Coral Reefs. In Encyclopedia of Ocean Sciences, Third Edition: Volume 1-5 (3rd ed., Vols. 1–5). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.10813-9

Pushparaj, J., & Hegde, A. V. (2017). Estimation of bathymetry along the coast of Mangaluru using Landsat-8 imagery. Journal of Ocean and Climate: Science, Technology and Impacts, 8(2), 71–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1759313116679672

Quang, N. H., Banno, M., & Ha, N-T. (2025). Satellite derived bathymetry using empirical and machine learning approaches: a case study in the highly dynamic coastal water. Coastal Engineering Journal, 67(2), 232–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/21664250.2024.2445418

Richardson, G., Knudby, A., Wu, Y., & Ansari, M. (2025). A case study comparing approaches to mask satellite-derived bathymetry. Discover Geoscience, 3, 103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44288-025-00219-1

Safi’i, A. N., & Dewi, R. S. (2020). Uji Akurasi Metode Berbasis Citra Satelit untuk Ekstraksi Data Batimetri. Teknik, 41(2), 142–151. https://doi.org/10.14710/teknik.v0i0.29516

Sagawa, T., Yamashita, Y., Okumura, T., & Yamanokuchi, T. (2019). Shallow Water Bathymetry Derived by Machine Learning and Multitemporal Satellite Images. International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), 8222–8225. https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2019.8899043

Sharr, M. B., Parrish, C. E., & Jung, J. (2024). International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation Automated classification of valid and invalid satellite derived bathymetry with random forest. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 129, 103796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2024.103796

Syaiful, S. N., Helmi, M., Widada, S., Widiaratih, R., Subardjo, P., & Suryoputro, A. A. D. (2019). Analisis Digital Citra Satelit Worldview-2 untuk Ekstraksi Kedalaman Perairan Laut di Sebagian Perairan Pulau Parang, Kepulauan Karimunjawa, Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Indonesian Journal of Oceanography, 1(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.14710/ijoce.v1i1.6262

Van Hengel, W., & Spitzer, D. (1991). Multi-temporal water depth mapping by means of landsat TM. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 12(4), 703–712. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431169108929687

Wei, C., Zhao, Q., Lu, Y., & Fu, D. (2021). Assessment of Empirical Algorithms for Shallow Water Bathymetry Using Multi-Spectral Imagery of Pearl River Delta Coast, China. Remote Sensing, 13(16), 3123. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13163123

Xie, C., Chen, P., Zhang, Z., & Pan, D. (2023). Satellite-derived bathymetry combined with Sentinel-2 and ICESat-2 datasets using machine learning. Frontiers in Earth Science, 11, 1111817. https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2023.1111817

Ye, M., Yang, C., Zhang, X., Li, S., Peng, X., Li, Y., & Chen, T. (2024). Shallow Water Bathymetry Inversion Based on Machine Learning Using ICESat-2 and Sentinel-2 Data. Remote Sensing, 16(23), 4603. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16234603

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

How to Cite

Apriliansyah, F., Nuha, M. U., Atmojo, A. T., Setiawan, K. T., & Syafnur, A. (2026). Comparative Accuracy of Satellite-Derived Bathymetry Using Random Forest, Multiple Linear Regression, and Van Hengel and Spitzer Algorithm. JURNAL GEOCELEBES, 10(1), 48–68. https://doi.org/10.70561/geocelebes.v10i1.43582

Issue

Section

Articles