Abstract
This study examines how Islamic Economic Values (IEV) are associated with Risk Assessment (RA) and self-reported Prudential Transaction Behaviour (PTB) among students participating in Islamic economics learning communities. A cross-sectional survey covered 146 purposively selected respondents from a reported FoSEI-affiliated student frame of 226 in 2025. Reflective indicator loadings, latent correlations and PLS-SEM path summaries are assessed for numerical and conceptual coherence. The reported path coefficients are positive for IEV–RA (β = 0.581), IEV–PTB (β = 0.271) and RA–PTB (β = 0.512), with a product term of 0.298. Recalculation from displayed outer loadings gives AVE values of 0.691, 0.654 and 0.686 for IEV, RA and PTB. The published IEV–RA correlation (0.602) differs from its single-predictor path coefficient, restricting joint inference without the underlying model outputs. The study distinguishes Shariah-compliance screening, monetary risk appraisal and self-reported caution, while specifying the inferential limits of a single-wave value–risk-orientation model. The findings inform differentiated financial education within comparable Islamic economics communities.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Albaity, M., & Rahman, M. (2019). The intention to use Islamic banking: An exploratory study to measure Islamic financial literacy. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 14(5), 988–1012. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-05-2018-0218
Antara, P. M., Musa, R., & Hassan, F. (2016). Bridging Islamic financial literacy and halal literacy: The way forward in halal ecosystem. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 196–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30113-7
Bananuka, J., Kasera, M., Najjemba, G. M., Musimenta, D., Ssekiziyivu, B., & Kimuli, S. N. L. (2020). Attitude: Mediator of subjective norm, religiosity and intention to adopt Islamic banking. Journal of Islamic Marketing, 11(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-02-2018-0025
Dew, J., & Xiao, J. J. (2011). The financial management behavior scale: Development and validation. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 22(1), 43–59.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
Hair, J. F., & Alamer, A. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) in second language and education research: Guidelines using an applied example. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 1(3), Article 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100027
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
Pasewark, W. R., & Riley, M. E. (2010). It’s a matter of principle: The role of personal values in investment decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0218-6
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
Zhao, X., Lynch, J. G., Jr., & Chen, Q. (2010). Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and truths about mediation analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 37(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/651257

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2026 Izzat Muhammad
