Main Article Content

Abstract

The dowry traditions has been in existence for a long time and is difficult to eradicate, serving as a symbol for the bride who will become a member of her husband's family. Over time, the basic essence and amount of dowry have changed. If the groom's family is not satisfied with the dowry given, it can lead to violence or even murder. The research method used is qualitative. This study aims to find out the problem of dowry death in India and the collaboration of UN Women and the Government of India in dealing with the problem of dowry death. The Indian government has also begun to think step by step that dealing with this case is still difficult to overcome, because the patriarchal culture is still strong. This study analyzes UN Women's cooperation with NGOs to deal with the dowry death problem. In 2019-2022, dowry death cases in India have started to decrease significantly. Although there are still many women who are not brave enough to report dowry violence.

Keywords

Dowry Government of India UN Women Dowry Death Anti-Dowry Program

Article Details

References

  1. Article
  2. Jawa Pos. (2018). “Tradisi Tak Ramah Perempuan di India”
  3. https://www.pressreader.com/indonesia/jawa-pos/20180308/281603830975500
  4. Asia Highlights. “The Caste System in India” https://www.asiahighlights.com/india/caste-
  5. system diakses pada tanggal 22 mei 2024
  6. Bagish Jha. (2023). “Husbands gets life in 2019 dowry death case by Panipat Court”
  7. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/gurgaon/husband-gets-life-in-19-dowry-death-case/articleshow/99004266.cms diakses pada tanggal 30 mei 2024
  8. Chaudhary, Surbhi. (2015). “Dowry and Dowry Death”
  9. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/readersblog/politiclaw/dowry-and-dowry-death-42574/ diakses pada tanggal 29 mei 2024
  10. CNBCTV18. (2021). “19 women were killed for dowry every day in 2020: NCRB”
  11. https://www.cnbctv18.com/india/19-women-were-killed-for-dowry-every-day-in-2020-ncrb-10758421.htm diakses pada tanggal 29 mei 2024
  12. Daily News Indonesia. (2021). “Dowry: Beban Berat dalam Pernikahan Keluarga Miskin India” https://www.dailynewsindonesia.com/news/mancanegara/dowry-beban-berat-dalam-pernikahan-keluarga-miskin-india/ diakses pada tanggal 29 mei 2024
  13. Fadhil Aprilyandi Sultan. (2023). Artikel LSF Discourse “Kajian Feminisme Eksistensialis Simone De Beauvoir: The Second Sex” https://lsfdiscourse.org/kajian-feminisme-eksistensialis-simone-de-beauvoir-the-second-sex/ diakses pada tanggal 30 Juli 2024
  14. First Post. (2023). “Another dowry death in India: What are India’s laws on the menace?” https://www.firstpost.com/explainers/kerala-doctor-suicide-dowry-death-india-law-13481842.html diakses pada tanggal 03 Agustus 2024
  15. Florida State College at Jacksonville “Caste System in Ancient India” https://fscj.pressbooks.pub/worldreligions/chapter/caste-system-in-ancient-india/#:~:text=Vaishya%20is%20the%20third%20Varna,from%20intentional%20or%20accidental%20misconduct. diakses pada tanggal 22 mei 2024
  16. Komisi Nasional Anti Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan. (n.d.). Modul “Pendidikan HAM BERPERSPEKTIF GENDER”. https://komnasperempuan.go.id/instrumen-modul-referensi-pemantauan-detail/modul-pendidikan-ham-berperspektif-gender diakses pada tanggal 09 Juli 2024
  17. KONSULAT JENDERAL REPUBLIK INDONESIA DI MUMBAI, REPUBLIK INDIA. (n.d.). “INDIA”. https://kemlu.go.id/mumbai/id/read/india/1078/etc-menu
  18. KONSULAT JENDERAL REPUBLIK INDONESIA DI MUMBAI, REPUBLIK INDIA. (n.d.). “Profil Negara India”. https://kemlu.go.id/newdelhi/id/read/profil-negara-india/2228/etc-menu
  19. PTI. (2024). “Husband, father-in-law arrested for woman’s death over dowry in India” https://www.deccanherald.com/india/haryana/husband-father-in-law-arrested-for-womans-death-over-dowry-in-noida-2961453 diakses pada tanggal 31 mei 2024
  20. Rathore, Manya. (2024). “Number of reported dowry death cases in India in 2022, by leading state” https://www.statista.com/statistics/633011/reported-dowry-death-cases-by-state-india/ diakses pada tanggal 26 mei 2024
  21. Rini. (2015). “Dowry dan Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan di India”. https://suluhperempuan.org/2015/01/24/dowry-dan-kekerasan-terhadap-perempuan-di-india.html diakses pada tanggal 23 mei 2024
  22. Sood, Amy. (2021). “Families are at war over a wedding tradition India banned decades ago” https://edition.cnn.com/2021/07/31/india/india-kerala-dowry-deaths-intl-hnk-dst/index.html diakses pada tanggal 31 mei 2024
  23. Statista Research Department. (2024). “Total number of reported dowry death cases in India from 2005 to 2022” https://www.statista.com/statistics/632553/reported-dowry-death-cases-india/
  24. Tawakal, Ikbal. (2021). “Gegara Mahar Nikah Kurang, Seorang Suami di India Bunuh Istri dengan Ular Kobra” https://www.pikiran-rakyat.com/internasional/pr-012784432/gegara-mahar-nikah-kurang-seorang-suami-di-india-bunuh-istri-dengan-ular-kobra?page=all diakses pada tanggal 31 mei 2024
  25. UN Women Asia and the Pacific. (n.d.). “CEDAW” https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/countries/india/cedaw diakses pada tanggal 10 Juni 2024
  26. UN Women. (n.d.). “About UN Women” https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/about-us/about-un-women-1 diakses pada tanggal 2 juni 2024
  27. UN Women. (n.d.). “CEDAW & Women’s Human Rights” https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/focus-areas/cedaw-human-rights diakses pada tanggal 2 juni 2024
  28. UN Women. (n.d.). “Ending violence against women” https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/ending-violence-against-women diakses pada tanggal 2 juni 2024
  29. UN Women. (n.d.). “UN Women India: Advancing gender equality and empowering women across India” by UN Women https://asiapacific.unwomen.org/en/countries/india diakses pada tanggal 2 juni 2024
  30. Journal
  31. Amalia, Ezka. (n.d.). Mahar Pernikahan dalam Perspektif Feminis Studi Kasus: Mahar Modern (Dowry) di India dalam Perspektif Feminis Sosialis. https://www.scribd.com/document/95157367/Mahar-Modern-DOWRY-di-India-dalam-Perspektif-Feminis-Sosialis
  32. Bahan Ajar. (2017). Pendekatan dalam Penelitian Kualitatif, Universitas Udayana. https://simdos.unud.ac.id/uploads/file_pendidikan_1_dir/434113472f0dc64681fc958a8037db67.pdf
  33. Cikita, F., Eka Nizmi, Y., & Olyvia, Y. (2023). Upaya Pemerintah India Mengatasi Tradisi Dowry tahun 2015-2020. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(2), 9326–9342.
  34. Deshpande, Manali S. (2010). ”HISTORY OF THE INDIAN CASTE SYSTEM AND ITS IMPACT ON INDIA TODAY” SOCS 461, 462 Senior Project Social Sciences Department College of Liberal Arts CALIFORNIA POLYTHECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY, San Luis Obispo Fall
  35. Dr.K.Neela Puspham. (2022). ”Dowry System in India”. International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts (IJCRT). Volume 10, Issue 1 January 2022
  36. Dwi, Risa Anggraini. 2023. “IMPLEMENTASI PRINSIP NON-DISKRIMINASI CEDAW DALAM MENGHAPUS DOWRY DEATH DI INDIA 2016-2021”
  37. Fauzan, Ni’ami. (2021). “Studi Peraturan Mahar di Pakistan: Telaah Argumentasi dan Tujuan Pembentukan”. Jurnal Mahkamah: UIN Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, diakses pada tanggal 07 Juli 2024 https://www.syekhnurjati.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/mahkamah/article/download/8735/3964
  38. Fitrah Awaliyah Rumadaul. (2017). “PERAN UNITED NATIONS WOMEN DALAM MENANGGULANGI DISKRIMINASI TERHADAP PEREMPUAN DI AFGHANISTAN”. Global Political Studies Journal Vol. 1 No. 1 April 2017
  39. Guswari, Andini. (2023). “Peran UN Women dalam Penanganan Kekerasan Berbasis Gender Pada Masa Pandemi COVID-19 di India”. Universitas Bosowa Makassar
  40. Israpil. (2017). “Budaya Patriarki dan Kekerasan Terhadap perempuan (Sejarah dan Perkembanganya),” Jurnal Pustaka, 2 (2017), 143-145.
  41. Kautsarini, Dianita. (n.d.). “Tradisi Mahar : Aspek Diskriminasi Pada Kaum PerempuanIndia” https://www.academia.edu/10771127/TRADISI_MAHAR_ASPEK_DISKRIMINASI_PADA_KAUM_PEREMPUAN_INDIA diakses pada tanggal 23 mei 2024
  42. Octaviani, S & Azizah, N. (2023). “Implementasi Program Anti-dowry UN Women dalam Upayanya mengatasi Permasalahan Dowry Death, India (2016-2021)”. Journal pf Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), Vol 6, No. 2, November 2023: 906-918
  43. Oktaviani, Jusmalia. (2017). “KEBIJAKAN PEMERINTAH INDIA DALAM MENGATASI MASALAH ‘DOWRY DEATHS”. Dinamika Global, Vol.02, No.01, Juni 2017
  44. Pertiwi, W.S., Hidayat, A., & Rizki, K. (2021). “Implementasi CEDAW di India: Studi Kasus Diskriminasi Perempuan dalam Tradisi Pemberian Dowry”. IJGD: Indonesian Journal of Global Discourse Vol. 3 Ed.1. Pages 55 - 80, January - June 2021
  45. Prof. Dr. Suryana, M.Si. (2010). “Metodologi Penelitian Model Prakatis Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif”. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
  46. Purnima Sharma, Christ. (2022). “The Changing Paradigms of Dowry Death in India”. Indian Journal of Integrated Research in Law. Volume II Issue I, ISSN: 2583-0538. Hal. 9
  47. Resen, Putu Titah K. (n.d.). “Kekerasan Terhadap Perempuan dan Keamanan Manusia (Studi Kasus: Dowry Murder di India)”. Jurnal Universitas Udayana https://simdos.unud.ac.id/uploads/file_penelitian_1_dir/f8e7df8e37b60498e64aa5995c70885c.pdf diakses pada tanggal 25 mei 2024
  48. Ridha, Rasyid. (2023). “Program Anti-Dowry Oleh United Nations Women di India Tahun 2016-2018”. Vol. 10: Edisi II Juli - Desember 2023
  49. Ruksin, Raudatul Ulum. (2018). “Institusi Minoritas dan Struktur Sosial di India”. Journal Multicultural and Multireligious. VOL. 17 NO. 1 (2018): JANUARI-JUNI 2018
  50. Sari, Milya & Asmendri. (2020). “Penelitian Kepustakaan (Library Research) dalam Penelitian Pendidikan IPA”. 6 (1), hal. 41-53
  51. Siswanto, Lisa C. (2017). Kegagalan Penerapan Prinsip CEDAW oleh India dalam Menangani Kasus Dowry Death, 6(Journal of International Relations Nomor 4), 517-524.
  52. Sultana, Abeda. (2012). “Patriarchy and Women’s Subordination: A Theoretical Analysis”. Bangladesh Journals Online https://www.banglajol.info/index.php/AFJ/article/view/12929
  53. Tobing, Bima Ardiansyah. (2024). “Peran Tradisi dan Budaya Dalam Menciptakan Ketidakadilan Terhadap Wanita India”. JoGP (Journal of Global Perspective) Vol. 2 No. 1 Juni 2024 Hal. 85-97
  54. Book
  55. A.Nunuk P. Murniati. (2004). “Getar Gender: Perempuan Indonesia dalam Perspektif Agama, Budaya, dan Keluarga”. Yayasan IndonesiaTera Anggota IKAPI, hal. 99
  56. Acik. (2020). “Kritik Marxis Terhadap Teori Patriarki” Bintang Nusantara, 2
  57. Ann Tickner & Laura Sjoberg. (2013). “Feminism”. Dalam Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, dan Steve Smith. ‘International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity Edisi Ketiga’. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Hal. 212-214
  58. Arivia, Gadis. (2006). “Feminisme: Sebuah Kata Hati”. Jakarta: KOMPAS
  59. Book Chapter. (2022). “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif”. CV Pradina Pustaka
  60. DR. Boer Mauna. (2005). “Hukum Internasional: Pengertian, Peranan, dan Fungsi Dalam Era Dinamika Global”. (2nd ed.) Hal. 458-461. Bandung: PT Alumni
  61. Dr. Yeyen Subandi, S.IP., M.A. (2021). Gender dan Hubungan Internasional. Lombok Nusa Tenggara Barat: CV Alliv Renteng Mandiri.
  62. Gamble, Sarah. (2010). “FEMINISME & POSTFEMINISME”. Yogyakarta: Jalasutra
  63. Prof. Dr. Nurliah Nurdin, S.Sos, MA. 2022. “Hak Asasi Manusia Gender dan Demokrasi (Sebuah Tinjauan Teoritis Dan Praktis).” Prubalingga: CV Sketsa Media
  64. Soekanto, Soerjono. (2012). “Sosiologi Suatu Pengantar”. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.Hal.207
  65. Sugeng, Bob Hadiwinata. (2017). “Studi dan Teori Hubungan Internasional: Arus Utama, Alternatif, dan Reflektivis”. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obo