Article Sidebar

Submitted
April 21, 2025
Accepted
July 30, 2025
Published
August 1, 2025
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 225 Download : 321

Main Article Content

Abstract

As a minority, Tibetans struggle to realize self-determination amidst the onslaught of oppression by China so that they can achieve freedom. Using a constructivist approach, this research analyzes China's dynamics in suppressing the fulfillment of Tibetan self-determination. The suppression carried out by China represents its more assertive position in the problems in Tibet, as well as being an idea that shows the interest in aligning Chinese identity, which makes the problems of minority groups a threat of separatism. The findings of this research include several main notes. China has succeeded in suppressing Tibet's position through various actions ranging from strengthening constructions related to Tibetan history and identity that can benefit its internal position, emphasizing securitization in the Tibetan issue to expand its sovereignty in peripheral areas, practicing modern colonialism, and strengthening the practice of particularism and creating a "New Era of China" that can limit Tibetan society. Thus, the self-determination that the Tibetan people want to achieve will only be an unrealizable wishful thinking.

Keywords

Self-determination Tibet Human right Constructivist

Article Details

References

  1. Aiqani, N. (2018). Dinamika Konflik China dan Tibet: Pendekatan Perdamaian Demokratis sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Konflik. Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional, 14(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.26593/jihi.v14i2.2990.189-201
  2. Alexandrov, M. (2003). The Concept of State Identity in International Relations: A Theoretical Analysis. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 10(1), 33–46.
  3. Anand, D. (2019). Colonization with Chinese characteristics: politics of (in)security in Xinjiang and Tibet. Central Asian Survey, 38(1), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2018.1534801
  4. Bajoria, J. (2008). The Question of Tibet. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/question-tibet
  5. Boer, R. (2022). Sovereignty and Human Rights: A Comparison Between Western Liberal and Chinese Marxist Traditions. Political Theology, 23(1–2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1932341
  6. Bulag, U. E. (2023). The wheel of history and minorities’ ‘self-sacrifice’ for the Chinese nation. Comparative Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2023.2271781
  7. Carvosso, R. (2020). Examining the suitability of the international minority rights regime as an avenue for advancing self-determination claims. International Journal on Minority and Group Rights, 27(4), 675–727. https://doi.org/10.1163/15718115-bja10001
  8. Central Tibet Administration. (2024). Glimpses on History of Tibet. Central Tibet Administration. https://tibet.net/about-tibet/glimpses-on history-of-tibet/
  9. Chiu, H., & Dreyer, J. T. (1989). Tibet : Past and Present. Contamporary Asian Studies, January 1989.
  10. Chung, C. P. (2018). Evaluating Xinjiang and Tibet as “internal colonies” of China: Evidence from official data. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 5(2), 118–139.
  11. Dorjee, T. (2015). The Tibetan Nonviolent Struggle: A STRATEGIC AND HISTORICAL ANALYSIS. In Report on Carcinogens Monograph on Epstein-Barr Virus: RoC Monograph 07. ICNC Press.
  12. Falkenheim, V. C., Wylie, T. V., & Shakabpa, T. W. D. (2024). Tibet. Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/place/Tibet
  13. Fierke, K. M. (2013). Constructivism. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds.), International Relations Theories Discipline and Diversity (Third Edit, pp. 205–222). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198814443.003.0013
  14. Gompert, D. C. (2022). Four Circles: Comprehending the China Challenge. Survival, 64(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2022.2055826
  15. Hastuti, M. (2011). Opsi Jalan Tengah Dalai Lama Dalam Penyelesaian Konflik China Tibet. Jurnal Studi Hubungan Internasional, 49–62. http://ejournal.umm.ac.id/index.php/jshi/article/view/1137
  16. Jnawali, H. H. (2023). Does the Interpretation of Self-determination Affect Autonomy Struggles in Asia? Ethnopolitics, 0(0), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449057.2023.2287386
  17. Kaewkhunok, S. (2019). The Energy Mix and the Impact of China’s Renewable Energy Development in Tibet: The Loss of Human Security. Political Science and Public Administration Journal, 10(July), 231–250.
  18. Kubálková, V. (2019). What constructivism? Routledge Handbook of International Relations in the Middle East, 23–45. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315229591-3
  19. Lal, A. K. (2020). Tibet is an Independent & sovereign state (not an autonomus region of China): Why US and UN need to change their perceptipon based on cold historical facts. 1–8. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/blogs/rakshakindia/tibet-is-an-independent-sovereign-state-not-an-autonomus-region-of-china-why-us-and-un-need-to-change-their-perceptipon-based-on-cold-historical-facts-2/
  20. Loh, A. (2022). Smog from Cambodia brings haze to parts of Malaysia. Nation. https://rfmrc-sea.org/smog-from-cambodia-brings-haze-to-parts-of-malaysia/
  21. Loong, S., Manby, A., & McConnell, F. (2023). Rethinking self-determination: colonial and relational geographies in Asia. Territory, Politics, Governance, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2023.2232410
  22. Moquette, M. (1990). Tibet, the Right to Self-Determination and Territorial Integrity. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 8(3), 261–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/016934419000800303
  23. Mukherjee, K. (2021). Conflict in Tibet: Internal and External Dimensions. Asian Affairs, 52(2), 288–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/03068374.2021.1907103
  24. Rapanyane, M. (2021). Neocolonialism and New imperialism: Unpacking the Real Story of China’s Africa Engagement in Angola, Kenya, and Zambia. Journal of African Foreign Affairs, 8(3), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.31920/2056-5658/2021/v8n3a5
  25. Roche, G. (2021). Tibetan Language Rights and Civil Society in the People’s Republic of China: Challenges of and for Rights. Asian Studies Review, 45(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357823.2020.1758033
  26. Smith, W. (2013). Voices from tibet.
  27. Sperling, E. (2004). The Tibet-China conflict : history and polemics. In Policy studies (Issue 7). East-West Center.
  28. Tsultrim, T. (2020). China is Destroying Tibet’s Culture & Religion: It Will Backfire. The Quint. https://www.thequint.com/opinion/china-tibet-protest-dalai-lama-communist-party
  29. Zhao, Z. (2023). What does the ideal citizen look like in China’s new era? A bottom-up view. Citizenship Studies, 27(6), 744–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2023.2287828
  30. Zhimin, X. (2019). Thinking on Long-term Construction of Tibet in Contemporary China. Social Sciences in China, 40(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/02529203.2019.1556473