Main Article Content

Abstract

The paper draws on Amitav Acharya’s theoretical frameworks of norm localization and security communities to examine the Thailand-Cambodia conflict over the Preah Vihear Temple, one of the most enduring international relations cases in Southeast Asia. The research will fill an important gap in the scientific literature by discussing how the constructivist ideas of Acharya shed light on the process of regional norm adaptation, identity formation, and the complications that arise when the (ASEAN) is forced to deal with an intra-mural territorial conflict as a fledgling security community. The study was based on using a qualitative case study approach with a secondary source analysis of the International Court of Justice proceedings, diplomatic archives, scholarly literature, and media archives to prove that local actors in both Thailand and Cambodia actively localized international norms of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and peaceful dispute settlement in a manner that both facilitated and hindered resolving conflicts. As the results demonstrate, the Preah Vihear conflict revealed underlying tensions within the ASEAN normative structure, especially between the principle of non-interference and the organization’s goal of becoming a mature security community. The article also examines the significant roles of the ASEAN chairmanship of Malaysia under Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim and of United States President Donald Trump in mediating the crisis in 2025, focusing on the Kuala Lumpur Peace Accord, its failure, and the future of peaceful relations. The article leads to the study of International Relations by showing how Acharya’s framework can provide analytical resources for understanding norm-conflict in the Global South, while also criticizing Eurocentric approaches to norm diffusion and elucidating the role of peripheral actors in the formation of regional order.

Keywords

norm localisation security communities Preah Vihear dispute ASEAN Thailand-Cambodia relations

Article Details

Author Biographies

Shamsul Azri Mohd Radzi, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Shamsul Azri Mohammad Radzi is a PhD candidate in Political Science at the School of Distance Education, Universiti Sains Malaysia, with a focus on political philosophy. He has written articles and published in various journals on global politics and leadership. In 2024, he represented Malaysia at the United Nations World Peace Summit in Bangkok. His academic interests focus on contemporary political thought, peace studies, and the dynamics of international relations.

Faridah Jaafar, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Faridah Ja'afar is a Senior Lecturer in the Distance Education Faculty at Universiti Sains Malaysia. She specializes in Malaysian foreign policy, international relations, and the role of the Prime Minister in shaping Malaysian diplomatic strategy. Dr. Faridah holds a Ph.D. in Malaysian History and Politics from the University of Malaya and has published numerous articles, books, and writings on the Malaysian political landscape. She actively teaches and oversees research in political science, with a focus on comparative foreign policy and leadership.

References

  1. Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. Routledge.
  2. Acharya, A. (2009). Whose ideas matter? Agency and power in Asian regionalism. Cornell University Press.
  3. Acharya, A. (2013). Civilizations in embrace: The spread of ideas and the transformation of power; India and Southeast Asia in the classical age. Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
  4. Acharya, A. (2014). ASEAN and regional order: Revisiting security community in Southeast Asia. Routledge.
  5. Acharya, A., & Buzan, B. (2019). The making of global international relations: Origins and evolution of IR at its centenary. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Acharya, A., & Johnston, A. I. (Eds.). (2007). Crafting cooperation: Regional international institutions in comparative perspective. Cambridge University Press.
  7. Boonkob, P. (2023). Conflict between Thailand and Cambodia over Preah Vihear Temple and the border disputes: Roles of the Joint Commission on Demarcation for Land Boundary (JBC) and ways to improve the relations. Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University Journal, 43 (Special Issue), 1-12.
  8. Buzan, B., & Acharya, A. (2022). Re-imagining international relations: World orders in the thought and practice of Indian, Chinese, and Islamic civilizations. Cambridge University Press.
  9. Chandler, D. P. (2008). A history of Cambodia (4th ed.). Westview Press.
  10. George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
  11. Gerstl, A., & Strašáková, M. (Eds.). (2017). Unresolved border, land and maritime disputes in Southeast Asia: Bi- and multilateral conflict resolution approaches and ASEAN’s centrality. Brill.
  12. Hayes, M. (2011, February 18). Cambodians rightly dig in heels. The Diplomat.
  13. Hobbs, C. (2025, December 24). Cambodia counts the costs of its border conflict with Thailand. The Diplomat.
  14. Hunt, L. (2011, April 13). Thai bomb talk. The Diplomat.
  15. Hunt, L. (2013, November 13). Cambodia cheers ICJ ruling on Preah Vihear. The Diplomat.
  16. Hunt, L. (2025, October 22). In photos: Life on Cambodia’s front lines. The Diplomat.
  17. Hunt, L. (2025, September 22). Thai military commanders vote to shut Cambodian border indefinitely. The Diplomat.
  18. Hutt, D. (2025, June 12). Does Cambodia really want to take its disputes with Thailand to the ICJ? The Diplomat.
  19. International Court of Justice. (1962). Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Merits, Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 1962.
  20. International Court of Justice. (2011). Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Provisional Measures, Order of 18 July 2011. I.C.J. Reports 2011.
  21. International Court of Justice. (2013). Request for Interpretation of the Judgment of 15 June 1962 in the Case concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand), Judgment. I.C.J. Reports 2013.
  22. Katzenstein, P. J. (Ed.). (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. Columbia University Press.
  23. Kulwuthivilas, S. (2021). The Preah Vihear dispute: The role of ASEAN mechanisms and norms in settlement attempts [Unpublished Master’s thesis]. Thammasat University.
  24. Kurlantzick, J. (2012). ASEAN’s future and Asian integration. Council on Foreign Relations Working Paper.
  25. LaRocco, L. (2011, July 19). ICJ rules on Preah Vihear. The Diplomat.
  26. Lloyd-George, W. (2011, April 30). Thailand, Cambodia spat gets ugly. The Diplomat.
  27. Ponniah, K. (2013, April 19). Preah Vihear Temple: Redrawing jungle lines. The Diplomat.
  28. Reed, J. (2025, July 8). A small state’s limited playbook: Cambodia exploits Thailand’s weakness. The Diplomat.
  29. Sophalkalyan, J. (2025, December 22). Why peace keeps failing on the Cambodia-Thailand border. The Diplomat.
  30. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE Publications.
  31. Strangio, S. (2025, July 28). The roots of the Thailand-Cambodia border conflict. The Diplomat.
  32. Strangio, S. (2025, November 11). Thailand suspends peace deal with Cambodia after landmine explosion. The Diplomat.
  33. Strangio, S. (2025, November 14). Malaysian PM Anwar attempts to get Thailand-Cambodia border deal back on track. The Diplomat.
  34. Strangio, S. (2025, December 8). Thai and Cambodian troops again clash along disputed border. The Diplomat.
  35. Strangio, S. (2025, December 9). Malaysia’s PM calls for calm after conflict reignites between Thailand and Cambodia. The Diplomat.
  36. Strangio, S. (2025, December 15). Thailand-Cambodia fighting enters second week as Bangkok spurns attempts at outside mediation. The Diplomat.
  37. Strangio, S. (2025, December 18). Thailand, Cambodia agree to deployment of ASEAN observers, Malaysian PM says. The Diplomat.
  38. Svay, S. (2015). Analysis of the Preah-Vihear Temple case, Cambodia v/s Thailand at the International Court of Justice under common territorial claims involving land disputes. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 36, 12-17.
  39. Turcsányi, R. Q., & Kříž, Z. (2017). ASEAN and the Thai-Cambodian conflict: The final stage at Preah Vihear? In A. Gerstl & M. Strašáková (Eds.), Unresolved border, land and maritime disputes in Southeast Asia (pp. 83-106). Brill.
  40. von Feigenblatt, O. F. (2012). The Thai ethnocracy unravels: A critical cultural analysis of Thailand’s socio-political unrest. Journal of Alternative Perspectives in the Social Sciences, 4(1), 231-250.
  41. Wagner, W. (2021). Colonial cartography and territorial disputes in Southeast Asia. International Studies Quarterly.
  42. Walsh, B. (2011, May 24). China and Thai-Cambodia spat. The Diplomat.
  43. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press.
  44. Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.