Article Sidebar

Submitted
March 29, 2026
Accepted
July 20, 2026
Published
August 3, 2026
Download
pdf
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Main Article Content

Abstract

The return of the Taliban in August 2021 has positioned Afghanistan at the center of debates on how the international community engages with a governing authority grounded in Islamic principles under conditions of contested legitimacy. This study aims to examine how Islamic governance operates as a foreign policy identity that shapes signaling dynamics, recognition practices, and patterns of international engagement. The paper employs a qualitative conceptual approach by integrating insights from norm contestation, identity-based signaling, and recognition-as-practice, using post-2021 Afghanistan as an analytical reference point. The findings show that Islamic governance generates distinct signaling processes that influence how external actors interpret and respond to political authority, leading to engagement through layered practices such as humanitarian coordination, diplomatic interaction, and security cooperation despite the absence of formal recognition. These interactions produce calibrated forms of engagement that balance normative concerns with practical necessity. The study concludes that governance identity plays a central role in structuring international engagement and provides a framework for understanding how interaction unfolds in a plural and contested global order.

Keywords

Islamic governance foreign policy identity Taliban international engagement contested legitimacy

Article Details

References

  1. Adler-Nissen, R., & Zarakol, A. (2021). Struggles for Recognition: The Liberal International Order and the Merger of Its Discontents. International Organization, 75(2), 611–634. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818320000454
  2. Acharya, A. (2018). The end of American world order (2nd edition). Polity.
  3. Ali, G. (2022). China–Pakistan cooperation on Afghanistan: Assessing key interests and implementing strategies. The Pacific Review, 35(3), 506–528. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2020.1845228
  4. Aras, B., & Akpınar, P. (2026). Beyond liberal peace? Qatar’s ’hybrid’ mediation and the politics of peacemaking in Afghanistan. Contemporary Politics, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2026.2643589
  5. Aydın‐Düzgit, S., & Noutcheva, G. (2022). External Contestations of Europe: Russia and Turkey as Normative Challengers?*. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(6), 1815–1831. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13380
  6. Badad, O. (2025). Negotiating Narratives: Media Framing of the US-Taliban Qatari Mediation. Journal of Peacebuilding & Development, 15423166251355719. https://doi.org/10.1177/15423166251355719
  7. Bouris, D., & Kyris, G. (2017). Europeanisation, Sovereignty and Contested States: The EU in northern Cyprus and Palestine. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19(4), 755–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/1369148117727534
  8. Caspersen, N., & Gueudet, S. (2025). ‘No longer what you used to be’: Renegotiating relations between de facto states and their patrons. European Journal of International Relations, 31(1), 178–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661241295690
  9. Channak, Z. M. O. (2026). Legitimacy and Legitimation: A Comparative Analysis of Islamic Law and European Standards through the Lens of SDG 16. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, 263. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-9.1-a000180
  10. Chitadze, N. (2024). Tools and Functions of Diplomacy in the Modern Period: In M. Zreik (Ed.), Advances in Public Policy and Administration (pp. 1–28). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-6074-3.ch001
  11. Grzybowski, J. (2019). The paradox of state identification: De facto states, recognition, and the (re-)production of the international. International Theory, 11(3), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971919000113
  12. Hasar, S. (2024). Recognition of Governments and the Case of the Taliban. Chinese Journal of International Law, 23(1), 73–122. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmae014
  13. Ker-Lindsay, J. (2015). Engagement without recognition: The limits of diplomatic interaction with contested states. International Affairs, 91(2), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12234
  14. Khan, H. (2026). Leveraging Afghanistan’s Geopolitical Position for Regional Connectivity and Trade Integration: In A. Medhekar, A. M. Islam, & S. J. Ahmed (Eds.), Economic Cooperation, Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements and Investments for Improved International Relations (pp. 27–66). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-1782-3.ch002
  15. Kim, H. (2026). Strategic legitimacy in global aid governance: Saudi Arabia and the UAE. Third World Quarterly, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2026.2634849
  16. Lovato, M. (2024). How informality keeps multilateralism going: The role of informal groupings in EU foreign policy negotiations. European Journal of International Relations, 30(4), 972–996. https://doi.org/10.1177/13540661241269782
  17. Mohibi, A. S. (2021). The Afghan Peace Talks: Transforming Experience and Using Knowledge to Confront Future Crises—What Does the Afghanistan Experience Tell Us About the Future of Countering Violent Extremism? In J. A. Goldstone, E. Y. Alimi, S. Ozeren, & S. Cubukcu (Eds.), NATO Science for Peace and Security Series – E: Human and Societal Dynamics. IOS Press. https://doi.org/10.3233/NHSDP200079
  18. Mosamim, P., & Villeneuve, J. (2026). Islamic Public Administration in Practice: The Taliban’s “Gender Apartheid” Governance in Afghanistan. Public Administration and Development, pad.70052. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70052
  19. Mostofa, S. Md., Subedi, D., & Brasted, H. (2024). Introduction to the special issue: Authoritarianism and religion in South Asia: Trends and twists. World Affairs, 187(2), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.1002/waf2.12014
  20. Munadi, S. M., & Mena, R. (2023). Dilemmas of humanitarian negotiations with the rise of the Taliban in Afghanistan. In A. J. Cunningham, Authoritarian Practices and Humanitarian Negotiations (1st ed., pp. 148–171). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003316541-12
  21. Naskou-Perraki, P. (2025). Diplomatic Relations Between States in Contemporary International Law. In P. Naskou-Perraki (Ed.), Contemporary Diplomatic and Consular Relations (pp. 33–70). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-99243-8_4
  22. Newman, E., & Visoka, G. (2018). The European Union’s practice of state recognition: Between norms and interests. Review of International Studies, 44(4), 760–786. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210518000104
  23. Nigam, A. (2021). Afghanistan—Development Options in the Context of US-Taliban Agreement and Great Power Rivalry. In A. Farhadi & A. J. Masys (Eds.), The Great Power Competition Volume 1 (pp. 195–214). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64473-4_10
  24. Popalzay, A. W. (2025). Between humanitarian imperatives and political legitimacy: A critical analysis of United Nations engagements with the Afghan Taliban (2021–2025). UNISCI Journal, 23(69), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.31439/UNISCI-240
  25. Popalzay, A. W. (2026). Gender apartheid in education: The Taliban’s educational restrictions and their consequences for Afghan women and girls. Journal of Gender Studies, 35(5), 1301–1313. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2025.2521683
  26. Ryan Teston, J., Konyndyk, M. E., Ferguson, R. C., & Heffron-Casserleigh, A. (2021). ECONOMIC RISKS FACING AFGHANISTAN: FAILED STATES AND BUREAUCRATIC RESISTANCE. 109–117. https://doi.org/10.2495/DMAN210091
  27. Sahill, P. H. (2023). Dwelling in an all-male world: A critical analysis of the Taliban discourse on Afghan women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 98, 102748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2023.102748
  28. Saif Saad Ahmed, Abdulsatar Shaker Salman, Ali Ghassan Ahmed Mohammed, Aida Apyshova, & Aqeel Mahmood Jawad. (2025). Reimagining Islamic Political Structures in Contemporary Muslim Societies: The Role of Global Networks and Transnational Movements. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(2), 513–534. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.13368
  29. Strand, A., & Suhrke, A. (2021). Quiet Engagement with the Taliban. Survival, 63(5), 35–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2021.1982196
  30. Žotkevičiūtė Banevičienė, A. (2025). State building terrorists’ groups: Case study of Taliban. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 36(6), 1049–1076. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2025.2494815