Issue

Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): International Journal of Applied Biology

Date Log

Submitted
Feb 21, 2020
Published
Jun 29, 2020

Effect of water stress and AM fungi on the growth performance of pea

https://doi.org/10.20956/ijab.v4i1.9446
Jaya Thakur
MCM DAV college for women Chandigarh
Bharat Shinde
Vidya Prathisthan, Baramati, Maharashtra

Corresponding Author(s) : Jaya Thakur

jayathakur1984@gmail.com

International Journal of Applied Biology, Vol. 4 No. 1 (2020): International Journal of Applied Biology

Abstract

The study was conducted to determine the effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi inoculation on growth of pea grown under water stressed pot culture conditions. Water stress was given to the pea plants after 30 days at the interval of 4, 8 and 12 days. The data was collected at an interval of 15 days. Three replicates of each set were maintained. . The mixture of AM fungi used for current experiment included the species of Acaulospora denticulata, A. gerdemannii, Glomus macrocarpum, G. maculosum, G. fasciculatum and Scutellospora minuta. The mycorrhizal plants have shown more shoot and root length as compared to the control plants. The height of shoot and root was significantly decreased with the increase in drought stress. Mycorrhizal plants with low water stress showed enhanced shoot and root length than high water stress. The mycorrhizal plants have shown more number of leaves than control plants during drought stress. The number of leaves significantly reduced with the increase in drought stress. The leaves produced by the control plants were comparatively smaller than those of mycorrhizal plants. The dry weight of root and shoot of both control and mycorrhizal plants decreased with the increase in water stress. Mycorrhizal plants showed more dry weight of shoot and root as compared to control plants.  Plants inoculated with AM fungi produce more dry weight than the control plants. The fresh weight of both control and mycorrhizal plants has been decreased with the increase in water stress interval and also the fresh weight of root and shoot was observed higher in mycorrhizal plants as compared to those of control plants.
References
  1. Aroca, R., Porcel,R. and Ruiz-Lozano, J.M. 2007. How does arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis regulate root hydraulic properties and plasma membrane aquaporins in Phaseolus vulgaris under drought, cold or salinity stresses? New Phytologist, 173: 808-816.
  2. Auge, R.M. and Moore, J.L. 2005. Arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis and plant drought resistance. In: Mehrotra VS (ed) Mycorrhiza: role and applications. Allied Publishers Limited, New Delhi, pp 13.
  3. Auge, R.M., Kubikova, E. and J.L. Moore 2001. Foliar dehydration tolerance of mycorrhizal cowpea, soyabean and bush bean. New Phytologist,151(2):535-541.
  4. Barea, J.M., M.J. Pozo, R. Azcon and C. Azcon-Aguilar 2005. Microbial cooperation in the rhizosphere. J. Exp.Bot., 56:1761-1778.
  5. De la Pena, E., Rodriguez, E.S., van der Putten, W.H., Freitas, H. and Moens, M. 2006. Mechanism of control of root feeding nematodes by mycorrhizal fungi in the dune grass Ammophila arenaria. New Phytologist, 169:829-840.
  6. Galvan, G.A.,K. Burger-Meijer, Th.W. Kuyper, C. Kik and O.E. Scholten. 2008. Possibilities fir breeding to improve responsiveness to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in onion. 16th IFOAM Organic World Congress.
  7. Gange, A.C. 2001. Species-specific responses of a root and shoot feeding insect to arbuscular mycorrhizal colonisation of its host plant. New Phytol, 150: 611-618.
  8. Heikham, E. Kapoor, R. and Giri, B. 2009. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in alleviation of salt stress: a review. Annals of Botany, 104(7): 1263-1280.
  9. Hildebrandt, U., Kaldrof, M. and Bothe, H. 1999. The zinc violet and its colonisation by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Journal of plant Physiology, 154: 709-717.
  10. Koide, R.T. and Kabir, Z. 2000. Extraradical hyphae of the mycorrhizal fungus Glomus intraradices can hydrolyse organic phosphate. New Phytol, 148:511-517.
  11. Koide, R.T. and Mosse, B. 2004. A history of research on arbuscular mycorrhiza. Mycorrhiza, 14: 145-163.
  12. Kothari, S.K., H. Marschnere and V. Romheld 1991. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus and rhizosphere microorganisms on manganese reduction in the rhizosphere and manganese concentration in maize (Zea mays L.). New Phytol, 117:649-655.
  13. Michelson, A. and Rosendahl, S. 1990. The effect of VA mycorrhizal fungi, phosphorus and drought stress on the growth of Acacia nilotica and Leucaena leucocephala seedlings. Plant and soil, 124: 7-13.
  14. Patale, S. W. and B. P. Shinde 2012. Studies on AM fungi of Bt cotton (Gossypium hirsutum, L.). Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pune.
  15. Smith, F.A., Grace, E.J. and Smith, S.E. 2009. More than a carbon economy: nutrient trade and ecological sustainability in facultative arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. New phytol, 182: 347-358.
  16. Vigo, C., Norman, J.R. and Hooker, J.E. 2000. Biocontrol of pathogen Phytophthora parasitica by arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is a consequence of effects on infection loci. Plant Pathology,49: 509-514.
  17. Wu, Q.S. and R. X. Xia 2006. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi influence growth, osmotic adjustment and photosynthesis of citrus under well-watered and water stress conditions. J. Plant. Physiol, 163: 417-425.
  18. Wu, Q.S. and R.X. Xia. 2004. Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on growth and osmotic adjustment matter content of trifoliate orange seedlings under water stress. J. Plant Physiol. Mol. Biol., 30: 583-588.
  19. Wu, Q.S., R.X. Xia and Y.N. Zou 2008. Improved soil structure and citrus growth after inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi under drought stress. Europ. J. of Soil Biol., 44:122-128.
Read More

Author Biographies

Jaya Thakur, MCM DAV college for women Chandigarh
Department of botany,Assistant Professor
Bharat Shinde, Vidya Prathisthan, Baramati, Maharashtra
Department of Botany, Principal
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 394 Download : 496

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.