Body Weight Response of Broiler Chicken Subjected to Post-hatched Fasting

Authors

  • M. R. Hakim
  • B. Syamsuriadi Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar 90245
  • S. Banong Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar 90245
  • W. Pakiding Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar 90245

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20956/jitp.v3i3.787

Abstract

The research aimed to assess body weight respons of broiler chickens with various body weights (BW) at hatch when subjected to post-hatched fasting and its subsequent impact on the final body weight. Two hundred and sixteen unsexed broiler chickens, strain Cobb aged 12 hours post-hatch, were randomly assigned into floor pen (six chicks per pen). The research was arranged in a 3 x 4 factorial arrangement according to completely randomized design with three replications for each treatment combination. The first factor was the BW at hatch, i.e. light (30.1±0.39g), medium ((33.3±0.44g), and heavy (33.3±0.44g). The second factor was the duration of post-hatched fasting, i.e. 24, 36, 48, and 60 h, respectively. All chickens were weighed at 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 h post hatch, then at 7 and 35 days of age. Data analysis indicated that the BW of chicken subjected to fasting at 48 to 60 h post-hatch decreased significantly at the rate of 8.6% and 12.5% of the initial body weight, respectively. However, this condition was not related to the initial body weight status of the chicken. Availability of feed after the fasting period was not sufficient to compensate retardation of body weight of the chicken subjected to fasting 48-60 h post-hatch.

References

Al-Thaleb, S. S. 2003. Effect of an early feed restriction of broiler on productive performance and carcass quality. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 4: 293 – 296.

Azis, A., H. Abbas, Y. Heryandi, dan E. Kusnadi. 2011. Pertumbuhan kompensasi dan efisiensi produksi ayam broiler yang mendapat pembatasan waktu makan. Med. Pet., 34(1): 50-57.

Bhanja, S. K., C. Anjali Devi, A. K. Panda and G. S. Sunder. 2009. Effect of posthatch feed deprivation on yolk-sac utilization and performance of young broiler chickens. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 22(8): 1174-1179.

Bigot, K., S. M. Grasteau, M. Picard, and S. Tesseraud. 2003. Effects of delayed feed intake on body, intestine, and muscle development in neonate broilers. Poult. Sci., 82: 781 – 788.

Careghi, C., K. Tona, O. Onagbesan, J. Buyse, E. Decuypere, and V. Bruggman. 2005. The effects of spread of hatch and interaction with delayed feed access after hatch on broiler performance until seven days of age. Poult. Sci., 84: 1314 – 1320.

Gasperz, V. 1991. Metode Perancangan Percobaan. Armico, Bandung.

Gonzales, E., N. Kondo, E. S. P. B. Saldanha, M. M. Loddy, C. Careghi, and E. Decuypere. 2003. Performance and physiological parameter of broiler chicken subjected to fasting on the neonatal period. Poult. Sci., 82: 1250-1256.

Jalal, M. A. R., and H. A. Zakaria. 2012. The effect of quantitative feed restriction during starter period on compensatory growth and carcass characteristics of broiler chickens. Pakistan J. Nutr., 11(9): 719-724.

Mahmoudi, S., A. M. Aghazadeh, N. M. Sis, K. Hatefinezhad, and A. Gorbani. 2012. Effects of delayed post hatch feed intake on performance of broilers kept in cages. Europ. J. Exp. Biol., 2(3): 843-845.

Maiorka, A., E. Santin, F. Dahlke, I. C. Boleli, R. L. Furlan, and M. Macari. 2003. Posthatching water and feed deprivation affect the gastrointestinal tract and intestinal mucosa development of broiler chicks. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 12:483-492.

Novele, D. J., J. W. Ng’ambi, D. Norris, and C. A. Mbajiorgu. 2009. Effect of different feed restriction regimes during the starter stage on productivity and carcass characteristics of male and female Ross 308 broiler chicken. Int. J. Poult. Sci., 8: 35 – 39.

Peebles, E. D., R. W. Keirs, L. W. Bennet, T. S. Cummings, S. K. Whitmarsh, and P. D. Gerard. 2005. Relationships among prehatch and posthatch physiological parameters in early nutrient restricted broilers hatched from eggs laid by young breeder hens. Poult. Sci., 84: 454-461.

Sahraei, M. 2012. Feed restricition in broiler chicken: a review. Global Veterinaria. 8(5): 449 – 458.

Santoso, U. 2002. Effects of early feed restriction on the occurance of compensatory growth, feed conversion efficiency, leg abnormality, and mortality in unsexed broiler chickens in cages. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci., 15(9): 1319 – 1325.

Sklan, D., Y. Noy, A. Hoyzman, and I. Rozenboim. 2000. Decreasing weight loss in the hatchery by feeding chicks and poults in hatching trays. J. Appl. Poult. Res., 9: 142-148.

Sklan, D., S. Heifets, and O. Halevy. 2003. Heavier chicks a hatch improves marketing body weight by enhancing skeletal muscle growth. 82: 1778 – 1786.

Syamsuriadi, B., Hamsah, S. Banong, W. Pakiding, and M. R. Hakim. 2014. Performa dan kondisi usus halus ayam pedaging dengan berat tetas berbeda apabila dipuasakan setelah menetas. JITP, 3(2): 81-89.

Vargas, F. S. C., T. R. Baratto, F. R. Magalhaes, A. Maiorka, and E. Santin. 2009. Influence of breeder age and fasting after hatching on the performance of broilers.J. Appl. Poult. Res., 18: 8 – 14.

Willemsen, H., M. Debonne, Q. Swennen, N. Everaert, C. Careghi, H. Han, V. Bruggeman, K. Tona, and E. Decuypere. 2010. Delay in feed access and spread of hatch: importance of early nutrition. Review.World’s Poult. Sci., 66: 177 – 188.

Zhan, X. A., M. Wang, H. Ren, R.Q. Zhao, J. X. Li, and Z.L. Tan. 2007. Effect of early feed restriction on metabolic programming and compensatory growth in broiler chicken. Poult. Sci., 86: 654 – 660.

Downloads

Published

2016-07-27

Issue

Section

Articles