Perspektif Disabilitas dalam Pemilu 2014 dan Kontribusi Gerakan Difabel Indonesia bagi Terbangunnya Pemilu Inklusif di Indonesia
Keywords:
Perspektif Disabilitas, Pemilihan Umum, Inklusi, Difabel, Organisasi DifabelAbstract
Abstract : This paper seeks to analyze how the contribution of Disability Social Movements in Indonesia to improve the quality of the future elections. The author is one of the organizers of this movements and follow the processes of disabled community organizing during the elections in four regions: Makassar (South Sulawesi), Balikpapan (East Kalimantan), Bantul (Yogyakarta), and Situbondo (East Java). Two things that are the focus of my analysis are the results of a survey on the perception of legislative candidates in 4 regions and election monitoring by Sasana Integrasi dan Advokasi Difabel (SIGAB) and its partners (Disabled people Organizations in a number of districts). The results of this survey and monitoring both contribute to the political science, especially in introducing Disability Perspectives in Electoral and Party Systems. In the present of political science study in Indonesia, scientists are relatively still do not understand yet the disability perspective in their efforts to develop a disability-based research methods and further designing a number of political instruments, in particular the way a difabel choosing political actors who cares for the disabled intersets and designing election models. The survey results indicate that the capacity of knowledge and experience the legislators candidate on the issue of disability is still weak, then how are we supposed to fill this lack of knowledge of disability through cooperation between political parties and organizations with a disability principal approach - agency. While the results of the election monitoring conducted by disabled people organizations have contributed to the explanation of how the election should take place and to accommodate the interests of voters with disabilities. Exposure results of this research and monitoring simultaneously aims to improve the quality of parliamentarians, election administration, and the electoral system so that political practice can take place in inclusion and more meaningful.
Keywords: Disabilities Perspective, General Elections, Inclusiveness; Difabel; Difabel Organization
References
Abberly, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap and Society, 2, 5 20
Barnes, C. (1990). Cabbage syndrome: The social construction of dependence. Lewes: Falmer.
Barton, L. (1996). Sociology and disability: Some emerging issues. In L. Barton (Ed.), Disability and society: Emerging issues and insights (pp. 3-17). London: Addison Wesley Longman.
Bowman, C. A., & Jaeger, P. T. (2003, April). Making diversity more inclusive: Toward a theory for the representation of disability. Paper presented at the 2003 American Education Research Association Conference, Chicago, IL.
Christensen, C. (1996). Disabled, handicapped or disordered: “What’s in a name?” In C. Christensen & F. Rizvi (Eds.), Disability and the dilemmas of education and justice (pp. 63-78). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Corker, M., & French, S. (Eds.). (1999). Disability discourse. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fakih, Mansour., ‘Jalan Lain: Manifesto Intelektual Organik’, INSIST Press, Yogyakarta, 2002.
Fine, M., & Asch, A. (1988). Disability beyond stigma: Social interaction, discrimination, and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 44(1), 3-21.
Finkelstein, V. (1980). Attitudes and disabled people. New York: World Rehabilitation Fund.
Hahn, H. (1997). New trends in disability studies: Implications for educational policy. In D. K. Lipsky & A. Gartner (Eds.), Inclusion and school reform: Transforming Americans classrooms (pp. 315-328). Baltimore: Paul H. Brooks.
Joni Yulianto, M (2007), “Investigation on the Influence of the Disability Movement in Indonesia: An Advance Investigation on the Influence of the Disability Movement in Indonesia”, VDM Verlag Dr. Müller, May 2.
Kitchin, R. (2000). The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research. Disability and Society, 15, 25-47.
Lonsdale, S. (1990). Women and disability. New York: Macmillan.
Marks, D. (1999). Disability: Controversial debates and psychological perspectives. New York: Routledge.
McDonald, P. (1991, March 8). Double discrimination must be faced now. Disability Now, 7-8.
McRuer, R. (2003). As good as it gets: Queer theory and critical disability. GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies, 9(1-2), 79-105.
Oliver, M. (1990). The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan.
Paul T. Jaeger dan Cynthia Ann Bowman (2005), ‘Understanding Disability: Inclusion, Access, Diversity, and Civil Rights.
Salim, Ishak, Ed, (2015), “Difabel Merebut Bilik Suara: Kontribusi Gerakan Difabilitas Dalam Pemilu Indonesia”, SIGAB.
Salim, Ishak. Risal Suaib, Dkk. 2014, Memahami pemilihan umum dan gerakan politik kaum difabel. SIGAB, Yogyakarta.
Salim, Ishak dan Syafi’ie, Muh., Ed., “Hidup Dalam Kerentanan: Narasi Kecil Keluarga Difabel”, SIGAB, 2015).
Samuels, E. J. (2003). My body, my closet: Invisible disability and the limits of comingout discourse. GLQ: A Journal of Gay and Lesbian Studies, 9(1-2), 233-255.
Shakespeare, T. S. (1994). Cultural representations of disabled people: Dustbins for disavowal. Disability and Society, 9(3), 283-301.
Siebers, T. (2001). Disability in theory: From social constructionism to the new realism of the body. American Literary History, 13(4), 737-745.
Silvers, A. (1998). Formal justice. In A. Silvers, D. Wasserman, & M. Mahowald (Eds.), Disability, difference, and discrimination (pp. 13-145). Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Silvers, A. (2000). The unprotected: Constructing disability in the context of antidiscrimination law. In L. P. Francis & A. Silvers (Eds.), Americans with disabilities: Exploring implications of the law for individuals with disabilities (pp. 126-145). New York: Routledge.
Stewart, D., Rosenbaum, P (2003)., Are, Who We, et al. “The International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF): a global model to guide clinical thinking and practice in childhood disability.”
Stone, E., & Priestly, M. (1996). Parasites, prawns and partners: Disability research and the role of non-disabled researchers. British Journal of Sociology, 47, 699-716.
Stuart, O. (1992). Race and disability: Just a double oppression? Disability, Handicap and Society, 7(2), 177-188.
Suharto, (2010) Community-based Empowerment for Translating Diffabled People’s Right to Work: A Case Study in Klaten Regency, Central Java, Indonesia, Research Paper, The Hague, The Netherlands: International Institute of Social Studies.
Switzer, J. V. (2003). Disabled rights: American disability policy and the fight for equality. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Thohari, Slamet, (2013), “Disability In Java: Contesting Conceptions of Disability In Javanese Society after the Suharto Regime”, LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Thomas, C. (1999). Female forms: Experiencing and understanding disability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Turnbull, H. R., Jr., & Stowe, M. J. (2001). Five models for thinking about disability: Implications for policy responses. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 12(3), 198-205.
Whiteneck, Gale. “Conceptual models of disability: past, present, and future.” Workshop on disability in America: A new look. Washington DC: The National Academies Press, 2006).
www.sigab.or.id
www.solider.or.id
