The economic value of Indonesia's tropical rainforest park (TH2TI) in South Kalimantan
Downloads
Urban forest is a form of environmentally oriented development. One form of urban forest in South Kalimantan is the Indonesia’s Tropical Rain Forest Park (TH2TI). This study aims to calculate the total economic value and future value of TH2TI. The total economic value calculated in this study consists of direct use value (recreation, wood, carbon and oxygen), indirect use value (water absorption), and option value (existence and heritage). The method used in this research was quantitative research method to calculate the value of wood, carbon, oxygen, and water absorption and qualitative research method to calculate the value of recreation, existence, and heritage. Results indicated that the economic value of recreation was the highest amounted to IDR 1,568,514,750.00 and the total economic value of TH2TI amounted to IDR 3,085,373,964.75. In the next 5 years, the economic value of TH2TI could reach IDR 3,664,456,405.74. The knowledge of the economic values of TH2TI is expected to make people aware to the importance of the environment for life.
Albarqoni F. (2013). Valuasi Ekonomi Lahan Hutan yang Berpotensi untuk Konversi Menjadi Kawasan Industri Kariangau Balikpapan Kalimantan Timur. Bogor: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen Institut Pertanian Bogor. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/64717.
Anjani, N. R., & Harini, R. (2016). Valuasi Ekonomi Hutan Kota Tebet Jakarta Selatan di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Bumi Indonesia, 5(1), 223111.
Bahruni, E Suhendang, D Darusman, & H Alikodra. (2007). Pendekatan sistem dalam pendugaan nilai ekonomi total ekosistem hutan: Nilai guna hasil kayu dan non kayu. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan, 4(3), 369-378. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2007.4.4.%25p.
Betani, A., Sribudiani, E., & Mukhamadun, M. (2016). Valuasi Ekonomi Karbon pada Tegakan Tingkat Tiang dan Pohon di Kawasan Hutan dengan Tujuan Khusus (Khdtk) Hutan Diklat Bukit Suligi Kabupaten Rokan Hulu (Doctoral dissertation, Riau University). Jom Faperta UR, Vol. 3 No. 2.
BPS [Badan Pusat Statistik] Kabupaten Cilacap. (2013). Cilacap dalam angka 2013. Cilacap: BPS Kabupaten Cilacap.
Firdaus H. (2013). Nilai Ekonomi Total dan Analisis Multi Stakeholder Hutan Rakyat di Kecamatan Giriwoyo Kabupaten Wonogiri Jawa Tengah. Bogor: Fakultas Ekonomi dan Manajemen, Institut Pertanian Bogor.) http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/67203.
IP, A., Abidin, Z., & Rosanti, N. (2022). Valuasi Ekonomi Pada Wisata Alam Curug Gangsa Di Kecamatan Kasui, Kabupaten Way Kanan Dengan Metode Biaya Perjalanan (Travel Cost Method). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Agroinfo Galuh, 9(3), 1259-1272 http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/id/eprint/45913.
IPCC. (2006). IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. (E. Simon, B. Leandro, M. Kyoko, N. Todd, and T. Kiyoto, eds.).
Jala & Nandagiri, L. (2015). Evaluation of Economic Value of Pilikula Lake Using Travel Cost and Contingent Valuation Methods. Aquatic Procedia, 4, 1315-1321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.171.
Ketterings QM, Coe R, van Noordwjk M, Ambagau Y, & Palm C. (2001). Reducing Uncertainty in the Use of Allometric Biomass Equations for Predicting Above-Ground Tree Biomass in Mixed Secondary Forest. Forest Ecology and Management 146: 199-209 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00460-6.
Kodoatie, Robert J., dan Roestam, Sjarief. (2006). Pengelolaan Sumber Bencana Terpadu Banjir, Longsor, Kekeringan dan Tsunami. Jakarta: Yursif Watampone (Anggota IKAPI).
Lubis SH, Hadi SA, & Ismayadi S. (2013). Analisis Cadangan Karbon Pohon pada Lanskap Hutan Kota di DKI Jakarta. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vol 10 No. 1. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2013.10.1.1-20.
Mahmud. (2011). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung (ID): CV Pustaka Setia.
Mulyadin MR & Surati. (2018). Nilai Ekonomi Total Hutan Kota PT. Holcim Indonesia TBK di Kabupaten Cilacap, Jawa Tengah. Jurnal Penelitian Sosial dan Ekonomi Kehutanan Vo. 15 No. 2, 2018: 93-106. https://doi.org/10.20886/jpsek.2018.15.2.93-106.
Muthmainnah & Tahnur, M. (2018). Nilai Manfaat Ekonomi Hutan Kota Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar. Jurnal Hutan dan Masyarakat, Vol. 10(2): 239-245 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/jhm.v10i2.4874.
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2002). Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 63 Tahun 2002 tentang Hutan Kota. Republik Indonesia.
Pemprov Kalsel [Pemerintah Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan]. (2019). Selayang Pandang Miniatur Hutan Hujan Tropis (TH2TI). Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan.
Permen LHK [Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan]. (2017). PermenLHK No. P.64/MENLHK/SETJEN/KUM.1/12/2017 tentang Penetapan Harga Patokan Hasil Hutan Untuk Perhitungan Provinsi Sumber Daya Hutan dan Ganti Rugi Tegakan. Republik Indonesia.
Pirard, R. (2005). Pulpwood Plantations as Carbon Sinks in Indonesia: Methodological challenge and impact on livelihoods. Carbon Forestry, 74.
Pratama, AB. (2019). Nilai Ekonomi Hutan Kota Babakan Siliwangi Bandung, Jawa Barat. Bogor: Departemen Konservasi Sumberdaya Hutan dan Ekowisata, Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/97727.
Rezekiah, A.A., Dewi, M.S., Rosidah, Renaldy, D., Pratiwi, F.S. (2021). Estimation of Carbon Stock in Mangrove Forest. Academic Research International, Vol. 12(2) 147-153.
Sutri. (2020). Pengaruh Konservasi Hutan Mangrove Terhadap Perekonomian Nelayan Desa Sei Nagalawan Kecamatan Perbaungan Kabupaten Serdang Begadai Provinsi Sumatera Utara. Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Resources Management Riau University.
Widada. (2004). Nilai Manfaat Ekonomi dan Pemanfaatan Taman Nasional Gunung Halimun Bagi Masyarakat. Doctoral Program Student Work, Bogor Agricultural University.
Yusri, S. (2012). Valuasi Ekonomi Sumberdaya Alam Kawasan Panas Bumi Kamojang Jawa Barat. Bogor Agricultural University.
