Penguatan Kapasitas Nasional dalam Teknologi Bawah Air: Strategi Riset, Industri, dan Kolaborasi Akademik
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Indonesia requires independent underwater-technology capabilities to support hydrographic survey, subsea infrastructure inspection, oceanographic research, environmental monitoring, search and rescue, and maritime defence. The initial manuscript identified technological gaps, limited laboratories, weak certification arrangements, human-resource constraints, and fragmented stakeholder collaboration. This revised study extends the analysis through a structured narrative review and policy analysis of national planning documents, international standards, and scientific literature on remotely operated vehicles (ROVs), autonomous underwater vehicles (AUVs), navigation, communication, safety, and technology commercialisation. The assessment is organised into six capability dimensions: mission demand, critical technologies, testing facilities, standardisation and assurance, human competencies, and industrial-governance ecosystems. The results indicate that the principal constraint is not merely the ability to build prototypes, but the absence of an end-to-end evidence chain linking user requirements, design, relevant-environment testing, qualification, certification, procurement, and life-cycle support. A national strategy should therefore shift from fragmented prototype projects towards mission-driven programmes supported by open-system architectures, a national network of test facilities, early off-takers, and a Triple Helix governance structure with clear programme ownership. A four-phase roadmap for 2026–2045 is proposed: foundation, integration, industrial scaling, and technology leadership. Each phase is controlled through decision gates and measurable indicators, including technology readiness, domestic content, failure-free operating hours, certified products, qualified personnel, and industrial contracts. The framework provides a basis for research programming, facility investment, procurement reform, and national underwater-technology industrial development.
Article Details
Section
How to Cite
References
[1] Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2014 tentang Kelautan, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2014.
[2] Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2017 tentang Kebijakan Kelautan Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2017.
[3] Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 34 Tahun 2022 tentang Rencana Aksi Kebijakan Kelautan Indonesia Tahun 2021–2025, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2022.
[4] Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 59 Tahun 2024 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Nasional Tahun 2025–2045, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2024.
[5] Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahun 2025 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2025–2029, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2025.
[6] Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 38 Tahun 2018 tentang Rencana Induk Riset Nasional Tahun 2017–2045, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2018.
[7] Republik Indonesia, Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2019 tentang Sistem Nasional Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi, Jakarta, Indonesia, 2019.
[8] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, Global Ocean Science Report 2020: Charting Capacity for Ocean Sustainability. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2020.
[9] Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO, The Science We Need for the Ocean We Want: United Nations Decade of Ocean Science for Sustainable Development (2021–2030) Implementation Plan. Paris, France: UNESCO, 2021.
[10] H. Etzkowitz and L. Leydesdorff, “The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations,” Research Policy, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 109–123, 2000, doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4.
[11] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Commercialising Public Research: New Trends and Strategies. Paris, France: OECD Publishing, 2013, doi: 10.1787/9789264193321-en.
[12] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 16290:2013, Space Systems—Definition of the Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) and Their Criteria of Assessment. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2013.
[13] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 20682:2026, Autonomous Underwater Vehicles—Risk and Reliability. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2026.
[14] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 25451:2026, Ships and Marine Technology—Technical Requirements and Guidelines for Seafloor Mapping with Uncrewed Marine Vehicles. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2026.
[15] DNV, “Unmanned underwater vehicles—Classification, certification and testing services,” DNV, Høvik, Norway, 2026. [Online]. Available: https://www.dnv.com/services/maritime-certification-materials-components/underwater-technology-services-1751/unmanned-underwater-vehicles-1710/. Accessed: Aug. 2, 2026.
[16] International Hydrographic Organization, IHO Standards for Hydrographic Surveys, S-44, 6th ed. Monaco: IHO, 2022.
[17] J. Yuh, “Design and control of autonomous underwater robots: A survey,” Autonomous Robots, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 7–24, 2000, doi: 10.1023/A:1008984701078.
[18] T. I. Fossen, Handbook of Marine Craft Hydrodynamics and Motion Control, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 2021.
A. Sahoo, S. K. Dwivedy, and P. S. Robi, “Advancements in the field of autonomous underwater vehicle,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 181, pp. 145–160, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.04.011.
B. Zhang, D. Ji, S. Liu, X. Zhu, and W. Xu, “Autonomous underwater vehicle navigation: A review,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 273, Art. no. 113861, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2023.113861.
C. Alexandris, P. Papageorgas, and D. Piromalis, “Positioning systems for unmanned underwater vehicles: A comprehensive review,” Applied Sciences, vol. 14, no. 21, Art. no. 9671, 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14219671.
[19] F. F. R. Merveille, B. Jia, Z. Xu, and B. Fred, “Advancements in sensor fusion for underwater SLAM: A review on enhanced navigation and environmental perception,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 23, Art. no. 7490, 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24237490.
[20] F. Akyildiz, D. Pompili, and T. Melodia, “Underwater acoustic sensor networks: Research challenges,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 257–279, 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2005.01.004.
[21] N. Saeed, A. Çelik, T. Y. Al-Naffouri, and M.-S. Alouini, “Underwater optical wireless communications, networking, and localization: A survey,” Ad Hoc Networks, vol. 94, Art. no. 101935, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2019.101935.
[22] X. Chen, N. Bose, M. Brito, F. Khan, B. Thanyamanta, and T. Zou, “A review of risk analysis research for the operations of autonomous underwater vehicles,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 216, Art. no. 108011, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.108011.
[23] Liu, F. Yu, B. He, and C. G. Soares, “A review of underwater docking and charging technology for autonomous vehicles,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 297, Art. no. 117154, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2024.117154.
[24] M. Brito and G. Griffiths, “A Bayesian approach for predicting risk of autonomous underwater vehicle loss during their missions,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 146, pp. 55–67, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.10.004.
[25] C. A. Thieme and I. B. Utne, “Safety performance monitoring of autonomous marine systems,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 159, pp. 264–275, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.11.024.
[26] S. B. Williams and I. Mahon, “Simultaneous localisation and mapping on the Great Barrier Reef,” IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 37–46, Sep. 2004, doi: 10.1109/MRA.2004.1337824.
[27] B. Jalving, K. Gade, O. K. Hagen, and K. Vestgård, “A toolbox of aiding techniques for the HUGIN AUV integrated inertial navigation system,” in Proc. OCEANS 2003, San Diego, CA, USA, 2003, pp. 1146–1153, doi: 10.1109/OCEANS.2003.178456.
[28] International Maritime Organization, Revised Guidelines for Formal Safety Assessment (FSA) for Use in the IMO Rule-Making Process, MSC-MEPC.2/Circ.12/Rev.2. London, U.K.: IMO, 2018.
[29] Biro Klasifikasi Indonesia, Rules for Approval of Manufacturers and Service Suppliers. Jakarta, Indonesia: BKI, 2024.