Transforming Citizen Engagement In E- Governance Framework: A Conceptual Analysis

Authors

Mohamed Awad Ali Al Araby Associate Professor at the Department of Public Administration, Faculty of Economics and Political Science, Cairo University, Egypt

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31947/jakpp.v10i2.35497

Keywords:

E- Governance, Citizen Participation, New Public Governance, E- Participation

Abstract

This article explores the transformative journey of citizen participation in public affairs, focusing on the evolution from traditional public administration to contemporary e-governance frameworks. It highlights the shift towards New Public Governance (NPG), where citizens are seen as active partners rather than passive recipients of services. The study reviews various public administration models, including classic public administration, New Public Management (NPM), and modern e-governance and open government models, identifying four waves of government evolution. It emphasizes the role of digitalization in enhancing citizen engagement, drawing on international practices from countries like Japan, Norway, the UK, and others. The article categorizes citizen engagement into four stages, from passive consumers to smart citizens in the digital era, and discusses the demand and supply aspects of participation. It underscores the importance of digital infrastructure, ICT education, and international best practices in fostering effective citizen engagement. The study concludes with recommendations for future research on policy labs, e-participation, and local participation indexes, aiming to enhance citizen involvement in governance and public service delivery.

References

Abd el Rasoul, S. (2009). Introduction to Economic Thinking Theories: Analytical study of modern economic evolution from the perspective of Islamic and Liberal Capitalist economies ", Journal of Al Mostaqbal Alaraby, pp.180-190.

Anders, N. and Schenk, B. (2019). Agility In Public Administration – Is Agility A Possibility and Where Are Its Limits? CEE e-Dem and e-Gov Days., pp.97-104.

Bernhard, I. (2014). E-Government And E-Governance: Local Implementation Of E- Government Policies in Sweden, Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Urban Planning and Environment, Division of Urban and Regional Studies, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.

Chwalisz, C. (2017), Citizen Engagement in politics and policymaking: Lessons from the UK, Research paper, Populus

Choi, J. and Xavier, J. (Eds) (2021). Digitalization of Public Service Delivery in Asia, Japan: The Asian Productivity Organization.

Grigorieva, E., Bystrakov, Al., Vukovic, D., (2020)., International Scientific and Practical Conference: Digital Finance 2020, February 7, 2020, in Moscow, Miklukho- Maklaya St., 6, Russia.

Grigalashvili, V. (2023), Digital Government and Digital Governance: Grand Concept, International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 6(2),1-25., DOI- http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2023.6201.

Guribye, E. and Iversen, L. (2020), Methods and tools for citizen participation and co- creation, Research paper, NORCE – Norwegian Research Centre AS., December 1, 2020.

Grazian, F., Nahr, H., Tsonev, I. (Eds) (2020). Next Level Participation: Citizen-Driven e- Democracy Tools, European Liberal Forum asbl.

IDSC (2021) Numeric Data of Local Population Distribution is Retrieved from Egypt's Description by information Report, 12th Edition, 2021, Issued by Information Decision Support Center (IDSC), A.R.E.: www.idsc.gov.eg

IPSC (2018) Information and Privacy Commission of New South Wales (2018), Charter for Public Participation – a guide to assist agencies and promote citizen engagement. https://www.ipc.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/file_manager/Charter_for_Public_Participation_a_guide_to_assist_agencies_and_promote_citizen_engagement_June2018.pdf

Ivanova, V.N.; Poltarykhin, A.L.; Szromnik, A.; Anichkina (2019), Economic policy for country’s digitalization: A case study, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1): 649-661. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1 (46)

Lowatcharin, G. (Ed.), (2021). A New Look of Public Administration, Thailand: College of Local Administration, Khon Kaen University

Lemke, F., Taveter, K., Erlenheim, R., Pappel, I., Draheim, D., & Janssen, M. (2020). Stage Models for Moving from E-Government to Smart Government. In A. Chugunov, D. Trutnev, I. Khodachek, & Y. Misnikov (Eds.), Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia - 6th International Conference, EGOSE 2019, Proceedings (pp. 152-164). Communications in Computer and Information Science; Vol. 1135 CCIS. SpringerOpen. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_12

Nunzio, C., Giulia, F., Stefano, A., and Luca, G. (2021) A systems approach to the Digital Transformation of Public Administration., Prospettive in Organizzazione, 14

Naruo, SS.(2016), Shingi-Kai Council for Policymaking process, National Planning Administration training course in Japan, follow up the seminar, Ministry of Planning, Monitoring, and Administrative Reform (MOPMAR) in cooperation with Japan International Cooperation Agency, 16th of July 2016.

Osborne, D.(1993), Reinventing Government, Public Productivity & Management Review, 16(4), 349-356.

OECD (2015) Policy shaping and policy-making: The governance of inclusive growth, Background report to the Public Governance Ministerial Meeting, 28 October: www.oecd.org/governance/ministerial/the-governance-of- inclusive-growth.pdf

Rodriguez, Fernando S., Komendantova,Nadejda, (2022), Approaches to Participatory Policymaking Processes: Technical Report, United Nation’s Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/unido-publications/2022- 12/PPM-WEB-final.pdf

Simonova, S. and Amare, M. Y. (2019), Aspects of Digital Documents Archiving by the Organizations in the Czech Republic in Context of the EU e-Government. The 2019 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT). DOI: 10.1109/DT.2019.8813756

Stojanovska-Stefanova, A., Aleksoski, O., Sopova, M. M. (2020). E-Government and Digital Public Services: The Macedonian Case of Digitalization, Socio Brains Journal, 7(74). 35-52.

Strokosch, K & Osborne, S.P. (2020), Debate: if citizen participation is so important, why has it not been achieved?', Public Money and Management, 40(1), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1654322

Thuber, L. S., Ingrams A., Dennis, H. (2020). Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity", Public Administration Review, 81(1), 91–109.

United Nations (2020): UN E-Government Survey Digital Government in The Decade Of Action For Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York: United Nations

Uzun, M. M. (2021)., Big Questions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Public Administration and Public Policy, Master Thesis, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science and Public Administration., Ankara, 2021.

Widyanarko, P. A., (2020). The Placeness of Public Service: Redefining the Meaning of Place in the Digitalization of Public Service Delivery, Master Thesis, the Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology., Aug. 2020.

World Health Organization (2022), Implementing Citizen Engagement within evidence- informed policy-making: an overview of purpose and methods. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061521