Kata Kunci
IKD
public satisfaction
e-government
Cara Mengutip
Abstrak
This study examines the effect of Digital Population Identity (IKD) service quality on public satisfaction at the Population and Civil Registration Office of Garut Regency, Indonesia. A quantitative approach with an explanatory survey design was employed. Data were collected from 100 IKD users selected through an accidental sampling technique, which was considered appropriate because no comprehensive sampling frame of active IKD users was available. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) with SmartPLS 4.0. The results indicate that IKD service quality has a positive and significant effect on public satisfaction (path coefficient = 0.749; t = 17.398; p < 0.001). The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.560) shows that service quality explains 56.0% of the variance in public satisfaction, while the remaining 44.0% is influenced by other factors outside the research model. The findings suggest that reliable digital services, clear information, responsive service officers, and user-friendly service processes are key determinants of citizens' satisfaction with IKD services. Considering the geographical characteristics of Garut Regency, improving citizens' satisfaction requires not only continuous enhancement of service quality but also context-sensitive strategies, including expanding digital access, strengthening digital literacy, and improving the accessibility of IKD services for communities in remote areas
Referensi
Chan, F. K. Y., Thong, J. Y. L., Brown, S. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Service design and citizen satisfaction with e-government services: A multidimensional perspective. Public Administration Review, 81(5), 874–894. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13308
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
Global Government Forum. (2023). Digital Leaders Study 2023: Digital identity systems as an essential capability for seamless citizen-centric services. Global Government Forum.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hardiyansyah. (2018).Quality of public services: Concept, dimensions, indicators, and implementation(Revised Edition). Gava Media.
Kala, D., Chaubey, D. S., Meet, R. K., & Al-Adwan, A. S. (2024). Impact of user satisfaction with e-government services on continuance use intention and citizen trust using TAM-ISSM framework. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 19, Article 1. https://doi.org/10.28945/5248
Ministry of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs Number 72 of 2022 concerning Digital Population Identity.
Ministry of Home Affairs. (2024, January 11). The Ministry of Home Affairs is developing a Digital Population Identity to facilitate public access to government services.Directorate General of Population and Civil Registration. https://dukcapil.kemendagri.go.id
Kurniawan, B., Sihombing, M., & Ridho, H. (2023). The influence of service quality on public satisfaction in population administration services at the North Padang Lawas Population and Civil Registration Office.PERSPECTIVE, 12(2), 526–541. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v12i2.8696
Lestari, S. R., & Rijali, S. (2025). Implementation of Digital Population Identity (IKD) in Tanjung District.JAPB: Journal of Public Administration and Service, 8(1), 521–540. https://doi.org/10.35722/japb.v8i1.1189
Lippert, S., Dlamini, S., & Ajayi, O. (2024). Considerations for trustworthy cross-border interoperability of digital identity systems in developing countries. AI & Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-024-02008-9
Lubis, T. A., & Ginting, W. O. (2024). The influence of service quality on public satisfaction in using the IKD application at the Medan City Population and Civil Registration Office.Journal of Public Administration, 10(2), 104–108.
Lwanga, S. K., & Lemeshow, S. (1991). Sample size determination in health studies: A practical manual. World Health Organization.
Marwiyah, S. (2023). Strategies for improving the quality of public services in the digitalization era. CV Mitra Ilmu.
Nurdiana, O., Iriany, I. S., & Ulumudin, A. (2024). The influence of public service quality on public satisfaction in Tarogong Kidul District, Garut Regency.Journal of Development and Public Policy, 15(1).
OECD. (2024). OECD survey on drivers of trust in public institutions – 2024 results. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9a20554b-en
Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460–469. https://doi.org/10.2307/3150499
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 64(1), 12–40.
Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL: A multiple-item scale for assessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670504271156
Patergiannaki, Z., & Pollalis, Y. A. (2024). E-government quality from the citizen's perspective. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 37(2), 232–254. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2023-0229
Pham, L., Limbu, Y. B., Le, M. T. T., & Nguyen, N. L. (2023). E-government service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and loyalty. Journal of Public Policy, 43(4), 812–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X23000296
Razanakoto, M. F. (2026). A systematic literature review of empirical research on e-government and trust. Administration & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/15396754251413048
Riauwati, J., & Dwiyanti, N. T. (2023). Analysis of the influence of the quality of population administration services on public satisfaction.REMIK, 7(1), 784–794. https://doi.org/10.33395/remik.v7i1.12163
Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J.-M. (2022). SmartPLS 4. SmartPLS GmbH. https://www.smartpls.com
Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2019).Research methods for business: A skill-building approach (8th ed.). Wiley.
Siagian, T. H., & Hasibuan, M. (2025). Analysis of the implementation of IKD at the Dairi Regency Population and Civil Registration Office.GOVERNANCE, 11(3).
Tui, F. P., Ilato, R., & Katili, A. Y. (2022). Public service innovation through e-government. Public: Journal of Human Resource Management, Administration and Public Service, 9(2), 254–263. https://doi.org/10.37606/publik.v9i2.338
Widiyarta, A., & Zunaidi, R. A. (2024). Digitalization of public services and public unpreparedness.Policy: Journal of Administrative Science, 15(2).
Wulandari, A. A. (2023). The influence of service quality on public satisfaction at the Sidenreng Rappang Population and Civil Registration Office.JIA: Scientific Journal of Administration, 11(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.55678/jia.v11i1.1062
Yaakoubi, O., El Guenuni, Y., Srainy, N., Iraqi, I., & Boubker, O. (2025). Mapping research trends on quality in electronic services. Administrative Sciences, 15(9), 373. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci15090373
Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Hak Cipta (c) 2026 Silmi Khiyarotillah Sutisna, Sintya Muslimah, Debby Shafira, Margaretta Vio Della Br Matondang; Dwi Nurhayati