About the Journal

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Riset Veteriner Indonesia (Journal of the Indonesian Veterinary Research) is an open access, double blind peer-reviewed, print and online journal that publishes in the form of original research, review, case study, short communication  in any areas of sciences of veterinary, animal sciences, biomedical sciences, biotechnology, biology, animal laboratory and biodiversity of animals. Manuscript should be produced from latest research or study.

(ISSN Print: 2614-0187, ISSN Online: 2615-2835)

Peer Review Process

The Indonesian Veterinary Research Journal uses high standards in the review process. Manuscript review will be carried out by double blind independent and anonymous reviews. After the review process, the decision making process will be carried out:
1. Acepted
2. Minor Revision
3. Major revision
4. Rejected
If the revision is minor, it is expected that the manuscript can be accepted again after 2 weeks and if the major revision is expected to be returned to the editor after 4 weeks.

Publication Frequency

This journal is published since 2018, published 2 (two) times in 1 (one) year, i.e. in January and July

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Jurnal Riset Veteriner Indonesia (Journal of the Indonesian Veterinary Research) or JRVI  is a peer-reviewed electronic international journal. This statement clarifies ethical behaviour of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the Peer-reviewer­­­­­ and the Publisher (Hasanuddin University). This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in JRVI is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Hasanuddin University as publisher of Jurnal Riset Veteriner Indonesia (Journal of the Indonesian Veterinary Research) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Hasanuddin University and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor of the Jurnal Riset Veteriner Indonesia (Journal of the Indonesian Veterinary Research) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

The editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention

Authors can be asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should guarantee that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects

If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.


Studies of animals including, but not restricted to, those describing induction of disease, administration of drugs or other substances, surgical interventions or clinical trials must be conducted in accordance with regulations governing the use of animals at the authors’ institution. It is the responsibility of the authors to obtain approval by the appropriate regulatory group (e.g., Institutional Laboratory Animal Care and Use Committee, Animal Ethics Committee) and report

this approval in their manuscript. The design of prospective studies involving client-owned animals with spontaneous disease (clinical trials) should be approved by the appropriate regulatory group (e.g., Hospital Board) and the manuscript should include documentation of informed client consent.

It is incumbent upon the authors to ensure that care of animals meets standards required by the authors’ institution. The Journal reserves the right to decline to publish manuscripts in which approval by the appropriate regulatory group is not reported or when the Journal has concerns about the welfare or treatment of animals used in the study. The Journal is not obliged to reveal the basis for such a decision. The Journal may request further information about care and use of animals including evidence of regulatory approval, client consent or compliance with local regulations.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.


Dwi Kesuma Sari, DVM, Ph.D


Study Program of Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Teaching Hospital
Faculty of Medicine
Hasanuddin University

in Collaboration with

Indonesian Veterinary Medical Association (PDHI)

Journal History

Jurnal Riset Veteriner Indonesia (JRVI) or Journal of the Indonesian Veterinary Research is an open access, double blind peer-reviewed, print and online journal that publishes in the form of original research, review, case study, short communication  in any areas of sciences of veterinary, animal sciences, biomedical sciences, biotechnology, biology, animal laboratory  and biodiversity of animals. Manuscript should be produced from latest research or study. Manuscript is written in English and Indonesian. Full-text of JRVI access to all papers is available for free.

Jurnal Riset Veteriner Indonesia is published by Study Program of Veterinary Profession Education in collaboration with the Indonesia Veterinary Medical Association (PDHI)

This journal is published since 2017, published 2 (two) times in 1 (one) year, i.e. in January and July

ISSN-cetak: 2614-0187