Metodologi dan Historiografi Indonesia: Tantangan Indonesiasentrisme dalam Era Global

Authors

  • I Ketut Ardhana Universitas Udayana
  • Ni Wayan Radita Novi Puspitasari Universitas Udayana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62924/jsi.v7i1.33013

Keywords:

local history; national history; regional history and Indonesianness

Abstract

The Indonesian centrism that was introduced after the formation of the modern Indonesian state experienced various interpretations in the dynamics of historical debate in Indonesia. This historical interpretation arises in connection with, on the one hand, the opinion that Indonesiacentrism is centered on Indonesia's interests, and on the other hand, it is thought to give rise to a lack of awareness of the development of historiography in other regions, both in local and regional contexts. Questions arise, including: first, how to interpret the understanding of Indonesian centrism in the context of historiography in global dynamics. Second, why does controversy arise between these interpretations, which seem to contrast one with the other? Third, how to position the understanding of Indonesian centrism in the context of the development of historiography, which is capable of developing not only local and national history studies but also regional history studies? In discussing this issue, efforts will be made to gain a better understanding of Indonesian historiography, which can strengthen Indonesianness itself without reducing the presence of dynamics in the local area and other regional areas.

References

Abdurachman & Sunarti, L. (2023). Meniti Ombak Sejarah: Suntingan Kenangan untuk Profesor Susanto Zuhdi. Jakarta: Penerbit Serat Alam Media.

Anderson, B. R. O. G. 1972. Java in a Time of Revolution: Occupation and Resistance, 1944-1946. Ithaca dan London: Cornell University Press.

Ardhana, I. K. (2005). Nusa Tenggara Nacheinrintung der Kolonialherrschaft, 1915-1950. Passau-Deutschland: Lehrstuhl fur Sudostasienkunde Universitat Passau.

Ardhana, I. K. (2011). The Encyclopaedia of Indonesia in the Pacific War: In cooperation with the Netherlands Institute for War Documentation. Peter Post, William H Frederick, Shigeru Sato (ed). Indonesia. Cornell: Cornell Southeast Asia program-Cornell University.

Burke, P. (ed.). (2002). History and Historians in the Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dahm, B. (1966). Sukarno’s Kampf um Indonesiens Unabhangigkeit. Berlin Frankfurt am Main: Metzner Verlag.

Graaf. H. J. de. (1949). Geschiedenis van Indonesia. s-‘Gravenhage-Bandung: NV Uitgeverij W van Hoeve.

Kartodirjo, S. (1982). Pemikiran dan Perkembangan Historiografi Indonesia. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Leur, J. C. van. (1973). Abad ke-18 Sebagai Kategori dalam Penulisan Sejarah Indonesia. Jakarta: Bhratara.

Lukas, A. et al. (2020). Radikalisme Lokal: Oposisi dan Perlawanan terhadap Pendudukan Jepang di Jawa, 1942-1943. Jakarta: PT Buku Seri.

Reid, A. (1969). Indonesian National Revolution, 1945-1950. Victoria: Longman Australia Pty., Ltd.

Smail, J. R. W. 1(961). On the Possibility of an Autonomous History of Modern Southeast Asia. Cornell: Cornell University Press.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-10

How to Cite

Ardhana, I. K., & Puspitasari, N. W. R. N. (2024). Metodologi dan Historiografi Indonesia: Tantangan Indonesiasentrisme dalam Era Global. Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia, 7(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.62924/jsi.v7i1.33013