Pandangan Sartono Kartodirdjo Mengenai Metodologi dan Historiografi di Indonesia dalam Buku Pemberontakan Petani Banten 1888

Authors

  • Oky Nugraha Putra Universitas Gadjah Mada
  • Anugrah Rahmatullah Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62924/jsi.v8i1.33089

Keywords:

historical thinking; methodology and historiography; Sartono Kartodirdjo

Abstract

This article aims to explore what Sartono noticed about the field which is the "spirit" of history writing itself. The analysis process carried out in this work focuses on how the involvement of social sciences, especially in this study using a sociological approach, has had a huge influence on the methodology used by Sartono. We can understand Sartono Kartodirdjo's historical thinking from the way he views historical events in Indonesia itself. This is inseparable from his lifetime which experienced the colonial period, independence, and post-independence revolution. From his dissertation on Banten farmers, we can see that Sartono is very sensitive to marginalized communities, and he expressed this in his excellent dissertation. He tried to challenge colonial historiography which was very Dutch in style scientifically by highlighting the role of farmers, religious figures and old aristocratic networks to be contrasted with the colonial government.

References

Herlina, N. (2001). 80 Tahun Prof. Dr. Sartono Kartodirdjo: Pelopor Sejarah Indonesia. Bandung: Masyarakat Sejarawan Indonesia dan Satya Historika.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1962). Some Problems on the Genesis of Nationalism in Indonesia. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 3(1), 67-94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0217781100000569.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1963). Historical Study and Historians in Indonesia Today. Journal of Southeast Asian History, 4(1), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0217781100000740.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1966). The Peasants’ Revolt of Banten in 1888. The Hague, Martinus Nijnhoff.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1970). Beberapa Masalah Teori dan Metodologi Sedjarah Indonesia. Lembaran Sejarah, 6.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1974). Bureaucracy and Aristocracy. The Indonesian experience in the XIXth century. Archipel, 7(1), 151-168. https://www.persee.fr/doc/arch_0044-8613_1974_num_7_1_1165.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1982). Pemikiran dan Perkembangan Historiografi Indonesia: Suatu Alternatif. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Kartodirdjo, S. (1992). Pendekatan Ilmu Sosial dalam Metodologi Sejarah.Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kartodirdjo, S. (2015). Pemberontakan Petani Banten 1888. Depok: Komunitas Bambu.

Nursam, M. (2008). Membuka Pintu Bagi Masa Depan: Biografi Sartono Kartodirdjo. Jakarta: Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Pace, D. (1978). Structuralism in History and the Social Sciences. American Quarterly, 30(3), 282–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2712503.

Putra, O. N. (2023). Perspektif Struktural dalam Penulisan dan Pengajaran Sejarah Revolusi Kemerdekaan Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Dinas Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Kota Yogyakarta bekerja sama dengan Departemen Sejarah UGM.

Ritzer, G. (2018). Sociological Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

Soedjatmoko, et al. (1995). Historiografi Indonesia: Sebuah Pengantar. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Tilly, C. (1979). As Sociology Meet History. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Center for Research on Social Organization.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-29

How to Cite

Putra, O. N., & Rahmatullah, A. (2025). Pandangan Sartono Kartodirdjo Mengenai Metodologi dan Historiografi di Indonesia dalam Buku Pemberontakan Petani Banten 1888. Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia, 8(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.62924/jsi.v8i1.33089