Etnis Tionghoa dan Konflik Sosial di Surakarta: Analisis Historis Kerusuhan 1998
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62924/jsi.v9i1.47561Keywords:
Chinese Indonesians, Discrimination, May 1998 Riots, SurakartaAbstract
This study examines the May 1998 riots in Surakarta by focusing on their causes, dynamics, and impacts on the Chinese Indonesian community. The monetary crisis that began in late 1997 triggered economic instability, mass unemployment, and social unrest, which escalated into large-scale riots. The Chinese Indonesians became the main targets of looting, arson, and physical as well as sexual violence, leaving deep psychological trauma and significant material losses. This research employs historical methodology through four stages: heuristics, source criticism, interpretation, and historiography. Primary sources consist of local newspapers (Solopos and Suara Merdeka), supported by secondary sources such as books and academic journals. The findings reveal that the Surakarta riots were not merely spontaneous incidents but were closely linked to the discriminatory policies of the New Order, socioeconomic disparities, and the state’s failure to protect minority groups. After the riots, the Chinese community faced long-term challenges, including loss of security, distrust toward the government, and economic collapse. However, community-based reconciliation efforts, such as those in Surakarta’s Chinatown, played a role in rebuilding social harmony. This study highlights the importance of both structural and cultural approaches in preventing the recurrence of similar ethnic conflicts in the future.
References
Aji, D. K. (2022). Reformasi di Simpang Tiga Pabelan: Aksi Demonstrasi Mahasiswa Muslim di Solo, 1998. Skripsi. Universitas Islam Raden Mas Said Surakarta.
Alam, M. B. S. (2024). Rekontestasi Kultural Etnis Tionghoa Kota Surakarta di Era Reformasi (Cultural Recontestation of Chinese Ethnicity in Surakarta City During the Reformation Era). 24(1), 86–99. https://doi.org/10.20473/mozaik.v24i1.49718.
Alamsyah, D., Avatara, S. P.-, & 2019, undefined. (2019). Harmonisasi hubungan antara etnis Tionghoa dengan etnis lainnya di Surabaya pada masa kerusuhan Mei 1998. Avatara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 7(1), 1-9. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/avatara/article/view/27422.
Aryani, M. K. (2022). Inpres No 14 Tahun 1967: Bentuk Diskriminasi Pemerintah Orde Baru Terhadap Etnis Tionghoa. JEJAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah & Sejarah, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22437/jejak.v2i2.21627.
Bilven, B., Nyúl, B., Relations, A. K.-I. J. of I., & 2022, undefined. (2022). Exclusive victimhood, higher ethnic and lower national identities predict less support for reconciliation among native and Chinese Indonesians through mutual. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 19, 262-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2022.10.011.
Bong, S. A. (2017). Trauma, memory and transformation: Southeast Asian experiences. Strategic Information and Research Development Centre.
Chong, W. (2018). Chinese Indonesians in post-Suharto Indonesia: Democratisation and ethnic minorities. Hong Kong University Press.
Februandari, A. (2023). Power and discrimination in a space: the role of cultural built heritage in identity construction of Chinese Indonesians. Thesis. Newcastle University. http://theses.ncl.ac.uk/jspui/handle/10443/5864.
Fitriani, E. (2021). Linking the impacts of perception, domestic politics, economic engagements, and the international environment on bilateral relations between Indonesia and China in the onset of the 21st century. Journal of Contemporary East Asia Studies, 10(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/24761028.2021.1955437.
Gomar, N., Pengukuran, E. H. J. P. dan, & 2024, undefined. (2024). Peristiwa Kerusuhan Mei 1998: Sebuah Gambaran Pengampunan Para Korban. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengukuran Psikologi: JPPP, 13(1), 43-54. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPPP.131.06.
Hikmawati, C. L. (2017). Opresi Berlapis Perempuan Etnis Tionghoa: Pemerkosaan Massal Terhadap Perempuan Etnis Tionghoa dalam Tragedi Mei 1998 di Jakarta. Jurnal Politik, 2(2), 337-364. https://doi.org/10.7454/jp.v2i2.76.
Himawan, E. M., Pohlman, A., & Louis, W. (2022). Revisiting the May 1998 riots in Indonesia: Civilians and their untold memories. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(2), 240-257. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034221084320.
Jannah, I., Sejarah, R. R.-A. J. P., & 2024, undefined. (2024). Sejarah Sosial Etnis Tionghoa di Kabupaten Sampang Pasca Kerusuhan 1998. Avatara: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah, 15(2). https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/avatara/article/view/60903/46731.
Lindsey, T., & Butt, S. (2018). Indonesian Law. Oxford University Press.
Sinar Merdeka (1998, March 19). Mata Uang Asia Tak Terkendali. Sinar Merdeka 1998, VI.
Noviyanti, N., Puji, R. P. N., & Hartanto, W. (2019). Gerakan Reformasi 1998 di Kecamatan Kaliwates Kabupaten Jember (Pengrusakan Toko Milik Etnis Cina). MUKADIMAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sejarah, dan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, 3(2), 1-5.
Nugroho, D. A., Muslikh, M., & Andriyanto, A. (2022). Keterlibatan Organisasi Gerakan Mahasiswa Nasional Indonesia (Gmni) Cabang Surakarta Pada Peristiwa Reformasi 1998 di Kota Solo. Siginjai: Jurnal Sejarah, 2(2), 45-55.. https://online-journal.unja.ac.id/siginjai/article/view/21536.
Presiden Republik Indonesia, (1948). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 1948 tentang Memperpanjang Waktu Lagi untuk Mengajukan Pernyataan Berhubungan dengan Kewargaan Negara Indonesia. Sekretaris Negara Republik Indonesia
Ramadhani, M. R., Ramadhani, R., & Rahmah, N. (2025). Peristiwa Pengkudetaan Presiden Soeharto Pada Tahun 1998: Studi Pemikiran KH Maimoen Zubair. Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA), 3(7), 1-15. https://jurnal.mediaakademik.com/index.php/jma/article/view/2644.
Ratnasari, D. M., Sutiyah, S., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2021). Keharmonisan Pedagang Pasar Gede Tahun 1998 Sebagai Materi Pengayaan Pembelajaran Sejarah SMA. Candi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Sejarah, 21(1), 121–135. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/sejarah/article/view/12997.
Rustopo. (2018). Menjadi Jawa: Orang-Orang Tionghoa. Ombak Bekerjasama dengan Yayasan Nabil.
Salim, L., & Ramdhon, A. (2020). Dinamika Konflik Kerusuhan Mei 1998 di Kota Surakarta Melalui Perspektif Korban. Journal of Development and Social Change, 3(1), 58-70.
Santoso, A. (2021). Dampak Kerusuhan Mei 1998 terhadap Perekonomian Masyarakat Etnis Tionghoa di Surakarta. Skripsi. STKIP PGRI Pacitan.
Santoso, A. (2023). Cerita Sumartono, Warga Keturunan Tionghoa Korban Kerusuhan Mei 1998, Jebol Tembok Rumah untuk Selamatkan Diri. https://surakarta.suara.com/read/2023/05/19/152435/cerita-sumartono-warga-keturunan-tionghoa-korban-kerusuhan-mei-1998-jebol-tembok-rumah-untuk-selamatkan-diri. Diakses tanggal 5 September 2025.
Sari, P. K., & Fakhruddin, F. (2016). Identifikasi Penyebab Krisis Moneter dan Kebijakan Bank Sentral di Indonesia: Kasus Krisis Tahun (1997-1998 dan 2008). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Pembangunan, 1(2), 377-388.
Solopos. (1998a, July 1). Menyikapi Kegelisahan WNI keturunan Cina. 1998.
Solopos. (1998b, July 8). Polresta kesulitan usut dalang kerusuhan. 1998.
Solopos. (1998c, July 8). Subsidi dicabut, harga terigu naik 60%. 1998.
Solopos. (1998d, July 10). Dalang kerusuhan dibeber pekan depan. 1998.
Solopos. (1998e, July 11). Kasus kerusuhan segera terkuak. 1998.
Solopos. (1998f, July 13). Seputar sebutan Cina dan Tionghoa. 1998.
Solopos. (1998g, July 14). Khusus untuk korban kerusuhan: Bantuan Rp 978 juta. 1998.
Solopos. (1998h, July 17). Penjarahan gaya pemulung dikeluhkan warga Tionghoa. 1998.
Syafrudin, I., & Maiwan, M. (2023). Politik Indonesia Kontemporer. UNJ Press.
Tempo. (2007). Peraturan yang menggusur Tionghoa. https://majalah.tempo.co/read/laporan-utama/124735/peraturan-yang-menggusur-tionghoa. Diakses tanggal 5 September 2025.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Moch Akbar Maulana

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright & License
Authors published in this journal agree to the following terms:
- The copyright of each article is retained by the author (s).
- The author grants the journal the first publication rights with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, allowing others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship and the initial publication in this journal.
- Authors may enter into separate additional contractual agreements for the non-exclusive distribution of published journal versions of the work (for example, posting them to institutional repositories or publishing them in a book), with acknowledgment of their initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (For example, in the Institutional Repository or on their website) before and during the submission process, as this can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and more extensive citations of published work.
- Articles and all related material published are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
All writing in this journal is the sole responsibility of the author. Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia provides open access to anyone so that the information and findings in these articles are helpful for everyone. Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia can be accessed and downloaded for free, free of charge, following the creative commons license.
License

Jurnal Sejarah Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
You are free to :
Share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format.
Adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Under the following terms:
Attribution: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so reasonably but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
ShareAlike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions: You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
