Seakeeping Performance and Passenger Comfort Assessment of a 300 GT Ro-Ro Ferry Using RAO, MSI, and MII Analyses

Main Article Content

Jusma Wahidah
Vidya Rezeki Ariani
Alamsyah
Amalia Ika Wulandari
Wardina Suwedy
Chris Jeremy Verian Sitorus
Hariyono
Harlian Kustiwansa
Cindy Lionita Agusty
Muhammad Anjas Syam

Abstract

This study examines the motion response and onboard comfort of a Ro-Ro ferry under varying wave directions and speeds using the Response Amplitude Operator (RAO), Motion Sickness Incidence (MSI), and motion-induced interruptions (MII) as evaluation parameters. Simulations were conducted using Maxsurf Motion software with wave heights of 3 m and 3.5 m and encounter angles of 0° (following seas), 90° (beam seas), and 180° (head seas) at vessel speeds of 0 and 12 knots. The MSI was assessed using both simulation results and empirical calculations, whereas the MII was evaluated according to the ISO 2631 standards at three onboard locations: the passenger, navigation, and vehicle decks. The RAO results indicate that the vessel met the NORDFORSK (1987) motion criteria under following and head seas but exceeded the roll limits in beam seas. The MSI values remained within the moderate comfort range, except under head seas at 12 kn, where the values approached the alert thresholds. The MII remained within acceptable levels under most conditions, although probable interruption levels were observed on the passenger and vehicle decks during beam sea conditions. Overall, the findings emphasize that wave direction and vessel speed significantly influence motion-induced discomfort and operational performance, underscoring the importance of optimizing route planning and speed to improve passenger safety and seakeeping performance on roll-on/roll-off ferries.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Wahidah, J., Ariani, V. R., Alamsyah, Wulandari, A. I., Suwedy, W., Sitorus, C. J. V., … Syam, M. A. (2025). Seakeeping Performance and Passenger Comfort Assessment of a 300 GT Ro-Ro Ferry Using RAO, MSI, and MII Analyses. Zona Laut Jurnal Inovasi Sains Dan Teknologi Kelautan, 340–351. https://doi.org/10.62012/zl.vi.45657
Section
Ocean Transportation Management and Shipping Technology Applications
Received 2025-07-17
Accepted 2025-08-21
Published 2025-11-02

References

[1] K. Heryandri, “The importance of Ferry Ro-Ro transportation in Indonesia and its contrary to the lack of attention on Ferry Ro-Ro Safety, which cause high rate of accidents and fatalities,” Advances in Transportation and Logistics Research, vol. 1, pp. 641–651, 2018.

[2] H. Enshaei, R. Birmingham, and E. Mesbahi, “Identification of influential parameters in a ship’s motion responses: A route to monitoring dynamic stability,” International Journal of Maritime Engineering, n.d. [Online]. DOI: 10.5750/ijme.v154ia1.874H.

[3] International Organization for Standardization, ISO 2631-1:2020 – Mechanical Vibration and Shock – Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-body Vibration – Part 1: General Requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 2020.

[4] A. Hunter, N. Bourgeois, and R. Langlois, “The impact of motion-induced interruptions on cognitive performance,” in Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Part I, vol. 15, pp. 235–245, 2021.

[5] S. K. Das and M. Baghfalaki, “Mathematical modelling of response amplitude operator for roll motion of a floating body: Analysis in frequency domain with numerical validation,” Journal of Marine Science and Application, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 143–157, 2014.

[6] S. Bielicki, A. Bednarek, and M. Kraskowski, “Evaluation of response amplitude operator of ship roll motions based on the experiments in white noise waves,” in Proc. ASME 2017 36th Int. Conf. Ocean Offshore Arctic Eng. (OMAE), Trondheim, Norway, vol. 7B, Ocean Engineering, p. V07BT06A022, 2017. DOI: 10.1115/OMAE2017-6255.

[7] A. B. Darmawan, Y. Y. Eka Darma, and J. Rulianto, “Analysis of the effect of outrigger (cadik) variations on motion response of fishing boat using CFD method,” IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, vol. 1081, no. 1, p. 012010, 2022. DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/1081/1/012010

[8] E. B. Djatmiko, Perilaku dan Operabilitas Bangunan Laut di Atas Gelombang Acak. Surabaya, Indonesia: ITSPress, 2012.

[9] R. B. Luhulima, D. Setyawan, I. Utama, and A. P. Utama, "Selecting monohull, catamaran and trimaran as suitable passenger vessels based on stability and seakeeping criteria," in The 14th International Ship Stability Workshop (ISSW), 2014, vol. 29, pp. 262–266.

[10] K. Suastika, H. Setyawan, D. B. Purwanto, and X. Zhang, “MSI Analysis of a Roro Ferry Design,” 2020.

[11] I. Sulovsky and J. Prpić-Oršić, “Seakeeping analysis of a double ended ferry,” Pomorski Zbornik, no. 4, pp. 223–235, 2022.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.