Effect of Variability on Cronbach Alpha Reliability in Research Practice

Authors

  • Muhammad Amirrudin Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
  • Khoirunnisa Nasution
  • Supahar Supahar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20956/jmsk.v17i2.11655

Keywords:

Cronbach Alpha, reliability, standard deviation, variability, variance

Abstract

This study aims to describe the effects of variability through data simulation to determine which aspect of variability that maximizes coefficient of Cronbach Alpha reliability.  Cronbach Alpha is widely used for estimation of reliability, in recent still. This study served a conceptual and practical simulation for estimating the profound aspect of Cronbach Alpha coefficient relating to the variability of the data. This study carried out with data simulated using the rand between method by Microsoft Excel then simulate different categorical data responses to different range of items by manipulating sample size, range, number of items, variance and standard deviation. The results show that number of variance and standard deviation of data had the most profound aspect of Cronbach Alpha's reliability other than range. The increasing number on some aspect shows that standard deviation and variance has the stability to shows the positive correlation with the coefficient of Cronbach Alpha reliability other than range.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological Testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, doi:10.1007/BF02310555

Cronbach, L. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64,

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. (3nd ed.). Los Angeles: Sage.

Furr, R. M., & Bacharach, V. R. (2008). Psychometrics. An introduction. Los Angeles: Sage.

Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10

Hoyt, C. (1941). Test reliability estimated by analysis of variance. Psychometrika, 6,

Jackson, R. W. B., & Ferguson, G. A. (1941). Studies on the reliability of tests. Department of Educational Research, University of Toronto.

Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3),

Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental lest scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

McDonald, R. P. (1985). Factor analysis and related methods. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.

Nunnally J, Bernstein L.(1994). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill Higher, INC;

Osburn, H. G. (2000). Coefficient alpha and related internal consistency reliability coefficients. Psychological Methods, 5,

Revelle, W., & Zinbarg, R. E. (2009). Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma. Psychometrika,74, doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z

Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach's Alpha. Psychometrika, 74, doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0

Tavakol M, Mohagheghi MA, Dennick R.(2008). Assessing the skills of surgical residents using simulation. J Surg Educ.;65(2)

Thompson, J.K. (2000). Body Image, Eating Disorder, and Obesity an Integrative Guide for Asesment and Treatment. Washington : American Psychological Association.

Urbina, Susana. (2004). Essentials of Psychological Testing. New Jersey:John Wiley Sons.

Warrens, M. J. (2015). Some relationships between Cronbach's Alpha and the Spearman-Brown formula. Journal of Classification, 32,

Zumbo, AM Gaderman. (2007). Ordinal Varsions Of Coefficients Alpha And Theta For Likert Rating Scales. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods 6 (1), 4

Downloads

Published

2020-12-23

Issue

Section

Research Articles