Interconnection Of Resouces, Organization, Norm In Institutional Agribusiness Of Chili Business, Barombong Kelurahan, Tamalate District, Makassar City
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to examine the role of agribusiness institutions in chili marketing and to analyze the R - O - N interconnectivity in the management of chili farming agribusiness institutions. Determination of informants in this study, namely the chairman of the Sukamaju Gapoktan 1 person, the chairman of the farmer group 6 people, the members of the farmer group 12 people, the chairman of the Aspartan 1 person, the wholesaler 1 person, the collector traders 2 people, the merchants the retailer traders 2 people. The analysis uses descriptive qualitative.
The results showed that the role of institutional chili marketing agribusiness institutions (Gapoktan and farmer groups) in marketing is to facilitate farmers in finding market information and selling prices, Aspartan is one of the agribusiness institutions that also plays a role in selling agricultural products from farmers directly to consumers, collectors, wholesalers and retailers play a role in buying and selling (exchange function).
The interconnectivity of Resources, Organization and Norm (RON) in all institutions seen in the marketing of chili agribusiness is different. Farmer-level institutions have low resources both in terms of human and financial, have a strong organization and there are rules or running values, while institutions at the wholesaler and traders level have strong resources in terms of capital, weak organization and rules of the game that are weak. unwritten, retailers have weak resources, organization and regulations. While Aspartan has strong resources, both human and financial, but there is no clear organizational structure and rules of the game.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This works is under Creative Commons Attribution LicenseReferences
Amelira Haris Nasution, Hanter dan Primananda Rahman, 2020. Peran Kelembagaan dalam Sistem Pemasaran Cabai Merah Di Sumatera Utara JIA (Jurnal Ilmiah Agribisnis) : Jurnal Agribisnis dan Ilmu Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian 2020:5(5):176-185 http://ojs.uho.ac.id/index.php/JIA doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.37149/JIA.v5i5.14225.ISSN:2527-273X (Online)
Amruddin, Harniati, Putri P, Eksa R., Wahyu T, Eka N,
Achmad M, Mochamad S, Wasrob N, Tri R.S, Vivi Z, 2021. Kelembagaan Agribisnis. ISBN: 978-623-342-231-4. Penerbit Kita Menulis. Cetakan 1, September 2021
Anonim, 2015. Macam-macam Kelembagaan dalam Agribisnis Beserta Perannya. Artikel. http://ariplie.blogspot.co.id201505macam-macamkelembagaan-dalam.htm. (Diakses 20 Oktober 2021).
Anonim, 2016. Peranan Agribisnis dalam Pembangunan Pertanian dan Perekonomian. Makalah. https://danielfery18.wordpress.com. pertanian.agribisnis.peran-agribisnis-dalam-pembangunan-pertaniandan-perekonomian. (Diakses 20 Oktober 2021).
Arifin dan Arsyad Biba, 2017. Pengantar Agribisnis. Penerbit. Mujahid
Arifin Fattah, 2018. Keberlanjutan Kelembagaan Agribisnis Tanaman Hortikultura Di Kabupaten Bantaeng. http://digilib.unhas.ac.id/di akses 2021
Nur Azizah HS, 2019. Interkoneksitas Kelembagaan Dalam Mendukung Keberlanjutan Agribisnis Cengkeh (Studi Kasus Kecamatan Tidore Timur, Kota Tidore Kepulauan). http://digilib.unhas.ac.id/di akses 2021
Bungin, M.B., 2008. Penelitian Kualitatif: Komunikasi, Ekonomi, Kebijakan Publik dan Ilmu Sosial Lainnya. Jakarta: Kencana.
Creswell, J., 2014. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Desain Riset: Memilih diantara lima Pendekatan. Pustaka Pelajar
Chambers, Robert, Pembangunan Desa, Mulai Dari Belakang, (Jakarta: LP3ES, 1987).
Denzin, N.K. dan Lincoln, Y. S. 2017. The SAGE Handbook Of Quality Research. Sage Publications
Denzin, N.K., 1989. The Research Act in Sociology. New York: McGraw Hill.
Djogo et al. 2003. Kelembagaan dan Kebijakan dalam Pengembangan Agroprofesi. Bogor.
Dharma (2011) Metodologi Penelitian keperawatan. Jakarta :CV. Trans Info Media.
Downey, W.D dan S.P.,Erickson, 1992. Manajemen Agribisnis. Erlangga, Jakarta.
Feder, E., 1978. Stawberry Capitalism: An Enquiry into the Mechanism of Dependency in Mexican Agriculture. Mexi co City: Editoral Campesina.
Freeman, O., 1981. The Multional Company. Instrument for World Growth. New York: Praeger.
Hamer, 1981. Self-Intest an Corruption in Bukusu Coopeartives. Human Organization.
Hernanto, 1991. Ilmu Usahatani. Penebar Swadaya, Jakarta
Irawan, P., 2007. Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif untuk Ilmu – Ilmu Sosial. Depok: Depertement Ilmu Adminitrasi FISIP UI
Kartono, K. 1980. Pengantar Metodologi Research Sosial. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.
Kerlinger F.N., & Lee H.B., 2000. Foundations of Behavioral Research. Harcpiurt College.
Korten dan Alfonso, 1981, Pembangunan Yang Memihak Rakyat, Jakarta: Lembaga Studi Pembangunan
Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G. 2000, 'Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences', in Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. [Eds.] The Handbook of Qualitative Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA. pp. 163-188.
Lincoln, Y. S. and Guba, E. G., 1994, Naturalistic Inquiry. California: Sage Publication
Mosher (1984). Menggerakkan dan Mengembangkan Pertanian. Yasaguna, Jakarta
Muhammad Tito Apriyanto, Ivan Chofyan, 2021. STRATEGI Pengembangan Agribisnis Cabai Merah di Kawasan Agropolitan Kabupaten Ciamis . Jurnal Perencanaan Wilayah dan Kota vol. 16, no. 1, hal. 9-16, Bulan Maret Tahun 2021 ISSN 01412-0690.
North W., Awang S.A., Purwanto, R.H dan Erny, 2013 Analisis Stakeholder Pengelolaan Taman Nasional Bantimurung Bulusaraung, Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan, Vol. 20, No.1, Maret. 2013: 11 – 21
North, C.D. 1991.Institutions, Institutional change and Economic Performance, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions. Cambri University, Cambridge. P 49 – 51.
North, C.D. 2005. Understanding the Process of Institutional Change. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Ohama, Y., 2001. Conceptual Framework of Participatory Local Social Development, Nagoya: JICA.
Ohama, Y., 2007. Participatory Local Social Development – An Emerging Discipline,. Bhrat B ook Centre: India.
Oxby, C., 1983. Farmer Groups in Rural Areas of the Third World. Community Development Journal. 18 (1), 50-59.
Pakpahan, Agus, 1989. Kerangka Analitik untuk penelitian untuk Rekayasa Sosial Perspektif Ekonomi Institusi” dalam prosiding Patanas Evolusi Kelembagaan Pedesaan. Pusat Penelitian Agro Ekonomi. Bogor.
Perkins, D.D., Florin P., Rich, R.C., Wandersman, A. 1999. Participation and the Social and Physical Environment of Residential Block: Crime and Community context.
Ruttan dan Hayami. 1984. Dilema Ekonomi Desa: Suatu Pendekatan Ekonomi Terhadap Perubahan Kelembagaan di Asia.Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Jakarta.
Salman, D., 2012 Sosiologi Desa, Revolusi Senyap dan Tarian Kompleksitas , Penerbit Ininnawa.
Sesbany. 2010. Penguatan Kelembagaan Petani Untuk Posisi Tawar Petani. STTP Medan. Medan.
Soekartawi, 1997. Analisis Usahatani. Universitas Indoenesia. Jakarta.
Soekartawi, Prinsip Dasar Manajemen Pemasaran Hasil – Hasil Tani Teori dan Aplikasinya. Raja Graindo Utama. Jakarta
Suharjito, D., 2014. Pengantar Metodologi Penelitian. IPB Press.
Sukmadinata, N.S, 2005. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. PT. Remaja Rosdakarya, Bandung.
Uphoff, N., 1986. Local Institutional Development. An Analitycal Sourcebook with Cases. West Hartford Connecticut: Kumarian Press.
Uphoff, N., 1986. Improving International Irrigation Management With Farmers’s Participation, West View Press, London.
Yin, R.,2006. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publication.
Yustika AE: 2013 Ekonomi Kelembagaan: definisi, teori, dan strategi. Bayumedia Publishing. Malang.