Analisis Risiko Keterlambatan Proses Perbaikan Kapal Menggunakan Metode Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA)
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The ship repair process in shipyards is highly complex and prone to delays due to various technical, managerial, and workplace environmental factors. PT XYZ, a company engaged in ship repair, continues to experience delays in project completion, adversely affecting company performance and shipowner satisfaction. This study aims to identify the risk factors contributing to delays in ship repair processes, determine risk priorities, and develop effective mitigation strategies. The Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method was employed, with data collected through observations, interviews, and questionnaires involving relevant parties in the ship repair process. The risks were assessed based on Severity, Occurrence, and Detection ratings to calculate the Risk Priority Number (RPN), supported by risk-matrix mapping. The results show that risks were identified across five categories of ship repair work: replating, piping, painting, welding, and safety-equipment maintenance. The risks with the highest RPN values were schedule changes caused by additional work (RPN = 28.07) and damage to safety equipment resulting from the absence of routine functional testing (RPN = 22.75). The study concludes that FMEA is effective in identifying and prioritizing delay risks in ship repair processes. Implementing structured mitigation strategies is expected to minimize work delays while improving the quality and safety of ship repair activities at PT XYZ.
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Allow anyone to modify, improve, and make derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit to you for the original work.
How to Cite
References
[1] A. M. Huda And M. Basuki, “Penilaian Risiko Keterlambatan Pekerjaan Reparasi Kapal Bg. Apc,” Jurnal Ilmu Teknik Dan Teknologi Maritim, Vol. 2, Pp. 207–219, 2023.
[2] W. A. Herdianti, D. Prasetyawati, And M. Setiawan, “Analisa Keterlambatan Proses Reparasi Kapal Km Dharma Ferry 9 Menggunakan Metode Time Cost Trade Off,” Journal Of Manufacturing In Industrial Engineering & Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, Pp. 10–19, Dec. 2023, Doi: 10.30651/Mine-Tech.V2i2.19087.
[3] L. Novianty, N. Abdurrahman Prasetyo, S. Wiratno Satoto, N. Pamungkas, And H. Saputra, “Studi Penyebab Keterlambatan Proyek Reparasi Ahts 65,5 M,” Pp. 17–19, 2022.
[4] M. B. Soares And M. Basuki, “Penilaian Risiko Operasional Penyebab Keterlambatan Proyek Reparasi Kapal Km Cargo Pada Galangan Kapal Pt Dewa Ruci Agung Surabaya,” 2023.
[5] R. Ardianto And I. Baroroh, “Identifikasi Risiko Keterlambatan Reparasi Kapal Kayu Menggunakan Metode House Of Risk,” Jurnal Jalasena, Vol. 4, 2022.
[6] H. D. Zennita Putri, I. P. Mulyatno, And P. Manik, “Studi Manajamen Risiko Dengan Metode Fta Dan Fmea Akibat Keterlambatan Proyek Pembangunan Kapal Perintis Km. Sabuk Nusantara 72,” Jurnal Teknik Perkapalan, Vol. 11, No. 2, 2023, [Online]. Available: Https://Ejournal3.Undip.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Naval
[7] R. Ardiansyah, D. Widyaningrum, And M. Jufriyanto, “Upaya Perawatan Peralatan Bengkel Alat Berat Pt. Bmi Dengan Metode Fmea,” Jurnal Sains Dan Teknologi, Vol. 5, No. 2, Pp. 660–668, Dec. 2023, Doi: 10.55338/Saintek.V5i2.2082.
[8] D. Setiono And J. D. Fairussihan, “Zona Laut Jurnal Inovasi Sains Dan Teknologi Kelautan,” 2023. [Online]. Available: Https://Journal.Unhas.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Zonalaut