Abstrak
This study offers a conceptual and critical analysis of how citizen engagement has evolved within the e-governance framework, emphasizing the transition from traditional public administration to New Public Governance (NPG) in the digital era. By mapping four waves of governance transformation—from hierarchical bureaucracies to smart governance—the article highlights the redefinition of citizens' roles from passive service recipients to proactive partners in public service co-production. Drawing on international best practices, including from Japan, Norway, and the UK, the study identifies the determinants of effective digital participation, such as ICT infrastructure, policy design, and civic readiness. The key finding is that meaningful e-participation is contingent on both the supply side (government initiatives and digital tools) and the demand side (citizen willingness and digital literacy), forming a two-way governance relationship. The research proposes a model of “Smart Citizen Governance” that integrates co-decision, co-implementation, and co-evaluation as central pillars of inclusive and sustainable public service delivery. This analysis is especially relevant for non-Western public administration contexts, where digital transformation intersects with diverse institutional traditions and citizen expectations. By addressing existing research gaps in digital governance and citizen empowerment, the article contributes to the broader discourse on public sector reform, democratic innovation, and local policy effectiveness in the Global South.
Referensi
Abd el Rasoul, S. (2009). Introduction to Economic Thinking Theories: Analytical study of modern economic evolution from the perspective of Islamic and Liberal Capitalist economies ", Journal of Al Mostaqbal Alaraby, pp.180-190.
Anders, N. and Schenk, B. (2019). Agility In Public Administration – Is Agility A Possibility and Where Are Its Limits? CEE e-Dem and e-Gov Days., pp.97-104.
Bernhard, I. (2014). E-Government And E-Governance: Local Implementation Of E- Government Policies in Sweden, Doctoral Thesis, Royal Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Department of Urban Planning and Environment, Division of Urban and Regional Studies, SE-100 44 Stockholm, Sweden.
Chwalisz, C. (2017), Citizen Engagement in politics and policymaking: Lessons from the UK, Research paper, Populus
Choi, J. and Xavier, J. (Eds) (2021). Digitalization of Public Service Delivery in Asia, Japan: The Asian Productivity Organization.
Grigorieva, E., Bystrakov, Al., Vukovic, D., (2020)., International Scientific and Practical Conference: Digital Finance 2020, February 7, 2020, in Moscow, Miklukho- Maklaya St., 6, Russia.
Grigalashvili, V. (2023), Digital Government and Digital Governance: Grand Concept, International Journal of Scientific and Management Research, 6(2),1-25., DOI- http://doi.org/10.37502/IJSMR.2023.6201.
Guribye, E. and Iversen, L. (2020), Methods and tools for citizen participation and co- creation, Research paper, NORCE – Norwegian Research Centre AS., December 1, 2020.
Grazian, F., Nahr, H., Tsonev, I. (Eds) (2020). Next Level Participation: Citizen-Driven e- Democracy Tools, European Liberal Forum asbl.
IDSC (2021) Numeric Data of Local Population Distribution is Retrieved from Egypt's Description by information Report, 12th Edition, 2021, Issued by Information Decision Support Center (IDSC), A.R.E.: www.idsc.gov.eg
IPSC (2018) Information and Privacy Commission of New South Wales (2018), Charter for Public Participation – a guide to assist agencies and promote citizen engagement. https://www.ipc.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/file_manager/Charter_for_Public_Participation_a_guide_to_assist_agencies_and_promote_citizen_engagement_June2018.pdf
Ivanova, V.N.; Poltarykhin, A.L.; Szromnik, A.; Anichkina (2019), Economic policy for country’s digitalization: A case study, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(1): 649-661. http://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2019.7.1 (46)
Lowatcharin, G. (Ed.), (2021). A New Look of Public Administration, Thailand: College of Local Administration, Khon Kaen University
Lemke, F., Taveter, K., Erlenheim, R., Pappel, I., Draheim, D., & Janssen, M. (2020). Stage Models for Moving from E-Government to Smart Government. In A. Chugunov, D. Trutnev, I. Khodachek, & Y. Misnikov (Eds.), Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia - 6th International Conference, EGOSE 2019, Proceedings (pp. 152-164). Communications in Computer and Information Science; Vol. 1135 CCIS. SpringerOpen. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-39296-3_12
Nunzio, C., Giulia, F., Stefano, A., and Luca, G. (2021) A systems approach to the Digital Transformation of Public Administration., Prospettive in Organizzazione, 14
Naruo, SS.(2016), Shingi-Kai Council for Policymaking process, National Planning Administration training course in Japan, follow up the seminar, Ministry of Planning, Monitoring, and Administrative Reform (MOPMAR) in cooperation with Japan International Cooperation Agency, 16th of July 2016.
Osborne, D.(1993), Reinventing Government, Public Productivity & Management Review, 16(4), 349-356.
OECD (2015) Policy shaping and policy-making: The governance of inclusive growth, Background report to the Public Governance Ministerial Meeting, 28 October: www.oecd.org/governance/ministerial/the-governance-of- inclusive-growth.pdf
Rodriguez, Fernando S., Komendantova,Nadejda, (2022), Approaches to Participatory Policymaking Processes: Technical Report, United Nation’s Industrial Development Organization (UNIDO), https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/unido-publications/2022- 12/PPM-WEB-final.pdf
Simonova, S. and Amare, M. Y. (2019), Aspects of Digital Documents Archiving by the Organizations in the Czech Republic in Context of the EU e-Government. The 2019 International Conference on Information and Digital Technologies (IDT). DOI: 10.1109/DT.2019.8813756
Stojanovska-Stefanova, A., Aleksoski, O., Sopova, M. M. (2020). E-Government and Digital Public Services: The Macedonian Case of Digitalization, Socio Brains Journal, 7(74). 35-52.
Strokosch, K & Osborne, S.P. (2020), Debate: if citizen participation is so important, why has it not been achieved?', Public Money and Management, 40(1), 8-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2019.1654322
Thuber, L. S., Ingrams A., Dennis, H. (2020). Government Openness and Public Trust: The Mediating Role of Democratic Capacity", Public Administration Review, 81(1), 91–109.
United Nations (2020): UN E-Government Survey Digital Government in The Decade Of Action For Sustainable Development, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York: United Nations
Uzun, M. M. (2021)., Big Questions of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Public Administration and Public Policy, Master Thesis, Hacettepe University Graduate School of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science and Public Administration., Ankara, 2021.
Widyanarko, P. A., (2020). The Placeness of Public Service: Redefining the Meaning of Place in the Digitalization of Public Service Delivery, Master Thesis, the Ragnar Nurkse Department of Innovation and Governance, Tallinn University of Technology., Aug. 2020.
World Health Organization (2022), Implementing Citizen Engagement within evidence- informed policy-making: an overview of purpose and methods. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240061521

Artikel ini berlisensi Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Mohamed Awad Ali Al Araby
