POTRET ABUSIVE JUDICIAL REVIEWDI MASA PEMERINTAHAN PRESIDEN JOKO WIDODO
Keywords:
democracy, judiciary, Abusive Judicial ReviewAbstract
In recent developments, Indonesia, as a democratic nation, emphasizes the government by the people, for the people, and of the people. The core of this democracy is reflected in the electoral process conducted every five years, ensuring the cyclical nature of government based on the people's mandate. However, the manipulation of the judicial system by the ruling government through the Supreme Court and Constitutional Court has raised concerns. This study investigates the phenomenon known as Abusive Judicial Review, where the judiciary, initially intended to oversee the hierarchy of laws and the constitution, is influenced by those in power. Utilizing normative legal research, this paper explores the extent to which judicial decisions can be swayed by political interests, thereby undermining democracy. The findings reveal that the judiciary's independence is compromised, resulting in decisions that serve the interests of the ruling regime rather than upholding democratic principles. This study offers a critical analysis of significant cases and proposes measures to protect judicial integrity. The novelty of this research lies in its comprehensive examination of the systemic issues within Indonesia's judiciary and its implications for democracy. The conclusion underscores the urgent need for reforms to safeguard the judicial process from political interference.
Keywords: Abusive Judicial Review; democracy; judiciary; Indonesia
References
Jurnal:
Benjamin Garcia Holgado and Raúl Sánchez Urribarri, "Court-packing and democratic decay: A necessary relationship?," Global Constitutionalism 12, no. 2 (2023): 365.
David Landau and Rosalind Dixon, “Abusive Judicial Review: Courts against Democracy,” Abusive Judicial Review: Courts against Democracy 53, no. 3 (2020): 1313–88, https://heinonline.org/HOL/License.
Holgado, Benjamin Garcia. “Court-Packing and Democratic Decay : A Necessary Relationship ?,” 2023, 350–77. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381723000011.
Ihza, Ivan, Shobari Hasibuan, and Sunny Ummul Firdaus. “Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Presidential Threshold ( Studi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tahun 2017-2022 )” 6, no. 3 (2022): 363–73.
José o.Liveros Ruiz, “Report on Abusive Judicial Review of Electoral Matters,” Mexican Law Review 16, no. 1 (2023): 43–76, https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24485306e.2023.1.18457.
Kent Roach, "Polycentricity and Queue Jumping in Public Law Remedies: A Two-Track Response," University of Toronto Law Journal 66 (2016): 3.
Mark Tushnet, "Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law," Indian Journal of Constitutional Law (2009): 190-21
Maria Popova, Persaingan Politik sebagai Hambatan terhadap Independensi Peradilan : Bukti dari Rusia dan Ukraina, 43 COMP. POL. BELAJAR. 1202, 1205 (2010).
Ministry of Interior v. Nat’l Rescue Party, Verdict No. 340, November 16, 2017, hal. 50 (S. Ct. Cambodia, Plenary of Trial Chamber).
Oiveros Ruiz, J. (2023). Report on abusive judicial review of electoral matters. Mexican law review, 16(1), 43-76.
Pratama, Syaugi, and Denny Indra Sukmawan. “On the Presidential Threshold Tinjauan Kritis Mengenai Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tentang Ambang Batas Pencalonan Presiden.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 4 (2023): 557–75.
Rosalind Dixon, “National Law School of India Review In Defense of Responsive Judicial Review In Defense Of Responsive Judicial Review,” National Law School Of India Review 34, no. 2 (2023): 105–15.
Sandy Kurnia Christmas and Evi Purwanti, “Perkembangan Sistem Pemerintahan Dan Konsep Kedaulatan Pasca Revolusi Perancis Terhadap Hukum Internasional” 2 (2020): 222–35.
Stefanus Hendrianto, “Early Warning Signs of Abusive Constitutionalism in Indonesia: Pandemic as Pretext,” Int’l J. Const. L. http://www.iconnectblog.com/2020/06/early-warning-signs-of-abusive-constitutionalism-in-indonesia-pandemic-as-pretext/
Sinnott-Armstrong, Walter. “Weak and Strong Judicial Review.” Springer Nature 22, no. 3 (2024): 381–92.
Wojciecih, Sadurski. Poland Constitutional. Oxford University Press, 2019.
Yance Arizona, “Legal Policy of President Joko Widodo and the Independence of Constitutional Court,” Jurnal Konstitusi 21, no. 1 (2024): 35–61, https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2113
Buku:
I Ketut Suardita, “Demokrasi Dan Pemilu Di Indonesia,” Konstitusi Pers, 2013
Ginsburg, Tom. Rule By Law The Politics Of Courts In Authoritarian Regimes. 3rd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.
Nurul Qamar and Farah Syah Rezah, Metode Penelitian Hukum, ed. Kahar Muzakkir and Faisal Rahman, 1st ed. (Makassar: CV Social Politic Genius, 2020).
Muhaimin, Metode Penelitian Hukum, 1st ed. (Mataram: Mataram University Press, 2020).
Perundang-Undangan:
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemilihan Umum
Artikel Internet:
Ady Thea, “Prof Susi Dwi Harijanti: Putusan MK Usia Capres-Cawapres Strong Abusive Judicial Review,” Hukum Online, 2023, https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/prof-susi-dwi-harijanti--putusan-mk-usia-capres-cawapres-strong-abusive-judicial-review-lt653f0cc82ae10/.
Cambodia Top Court Dissolves Main Opposition CNRP Party, BBC NEWS https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-42006828 [https://perma.cc/P6Z8- CC93].
Detik News, "MK: Pembentuk UU Ciptaker Tak Beri Ruang Partisipasi Publik Secara Maksimal," https://news.detik.com/berita/d-5827692/mk-pembentuk-uu-ciptaker-tak-beri-ruang-partisipasi-publik-secara-maksimal.
Hannah Beech, "Cambodia Re-elects its Leader, a Result Predetermined by One," New York Times, 29 Juli 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/29/world/asia/cambodia-election-hun-sen.html [https://perma.cc/H55R-HXLX
Julia Wallace, "'Fireflies' and 'Ghosts' in Cambodia Prop up Facade of Real Election," New York Times, 11 Juli 2018, https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/11/world/asia/cambodia-election-hun-sen.html [https://perma.cc/N9BM-76VX
Ega Adriansyah, “Setelah MA Mengubah Batas Usia Calon Kepala Daerah,” DetikNews, 2024, https://news.detik.com/kolom/d-7391127/setelah-ma-mengubah-batas-usia-calon-gubernur.
Perludem, “Putusan MK Nomor 90/PUU-XXI/2023 Tentang Ketentuan Tambahan Pengalaman Menjabat Dari Keterpilihan Pemilu Dalam Syarat Usia Minimal Capres/Cawapres,” 2023, https://perludem.org/2023/10/17/putusan-mk-nomor-90-puu-xxi-2023-tentang-ketentuan-tambahan-pengalaman-menjabat-dari-keterpilihan-pemilu-dalam-syarat-usia-minimal-capres-cawapres/.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
We affirm our commitment to promoting open access to scientific research through this journal so that everyone can read, download, and use the published articles freely and without charge.
