Farmer Modernity: Levels of Modernity and Structural and Cultural Barriers in Rice Agribusiness
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to determine the level of modernity of rice farmers, identify agricultural modernization processes that encourage the modernity of rice farmers, and identify obstacles (structural and cultural) that hinder the modernity of rice farmers. This research was conducted in Timusu Village, Liliriaja District, Soppeng Regency, South Sulawesi. This research approach is a quantitative approach using survey methods through direct interviews with rice farmers and filling out questionnaires. The measurement of modernity uses the Likert scale and the data analysis used is descriptive statistical analysis. Based on the results of the Likert scale analysis on the level of modernity of rice farmers measured through fourteen indicators, an average total score of 147 and an average index of 69.95% were obtained, meaning that the level of modernity of rice farmers is in the high category. Agricultural modernization occurs when rice farming communities see farmers in other regions using modern agricultural technology. The presence of the use of modern agricultural technology can facilitate and speed up the completion of work. This encourages the modernity of rice farmers who are always interested in trying new things, as well as accepting change. The social relations and way of life of farmers began to change and adapt to today's connections and way of life. The barriers to modernity of rice farmers are divided into two parts: structural barriers and cultural barriers. Structural obstacles are caused by the narrow area of arable land and the institutional role of farmer groups is lacking in the management of alsintan use. Meanwhile, cultural barriers are caused by low farmer education and aging of farmers.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
This works is under Creative Commons Attribution LicenseReferences
Aldillah, R. (2016). Kinerja Pemanfaatan Mekanisasi Pertanian dan Implikasinya dalam Upaya Percepatan Produksi Pangan di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 34(2), 163. https://doi.org/10.21082/fae.v34n2.2016.163-171
Arta, I. K. G., Suda, I. K., & Dharmika, I. B. (2020). Modernisasi Pertanian: Perubahan Sosial, Budaya, dan Agama (I Putu San). UNHI Press.
Bahrun, S., Alifah, S., & Mulyono, S. (2017). Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Survey Pemasaran dan Penjualan Berbasis Web. 2(2), 81–88.
Bappenas. (2020). Laporan Perkembangan Ekonomi Indonesia dan Dunia Triwulan IV 2019.Https://Www.Bappenas.Go.Id/Files/2715/8529/3891/Laporan_Perkembangan_Ekonomi_Indonesia_dan_Dunia_Triwulan_IV_2019.Pdf.Pdf, 4(4).
BPS. (2020). Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan dalam Angka 2020. BPS Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan.
BPS. (2021). Kecamatan Liliriaja dalam Angka Liliriaja Subdistricts in Figures 2021. BPS Kabupaten Soppeng. https://soppengkab.bps.go.id
Darmadi, H. (2011). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Cv. Alfabet.
Fattahaya. (2017). Modernisasi Pertanian Pada Petani Padi Di Kecamatan Bandar Baru Kabupaten Pidie Jaya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FISIP Unsyiah, 2, 865–906.
Habtiah, M., Fahriansah, & Hisan, K. (2021). Dampak Penggunaan Teknologi Pertanian Terhadap Perubahan Sosial Ekonomi Masyarakat Buruh Tani Padi di Gampong Paya Seungat Aceh Timur. JIM (Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa), 3(April), 58–71.
Herlangga, J. (2020). Sarana Pelatihan dan Pengembangan Pertanian Padi Di Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta.
Husein, U. (2011). Metode Penelitian untuk Skripsi dan Tesis Bisnis. Cetakan ke 11. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Moroki, S., Masinambow, V. A. ., & Kalangi, J. B. (2018). Analisis Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Pendapatan Petani Di Kecamatan Amurang Timur. Jurnal Berkala Ilmiah Efisiensi, 18(5), 132–142.
Rosana, E. (2015). Modernisasi dalam Perspektif perubahan Sosial. 67–82.
Saputra, P. A., & Nugroho, A. (2017). Perancangan dan Implementasi Survei Kepuasan Pengunjung Berbasis Web Di Perpustakaan Daerah Kota Salatiga. JUTI: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Informasi, 15, 63–71.
Saropah, S. (2020). Modernisasi Teknologi Pertanian dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Ekonomi Petani Di Kecamatan Patebon Kabupaten Kendal Tahun 1979-2013. Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Sholikhah, A. (2016). Statistik Deskriptif Dalam Penelitian Kualitatif. Komunika, 10(2), 342–362.
Sriyana. (2020). Perubahan Sosial Budaya. Malang: Literasi Nusantara.
Sugiyono, P. D. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. ALFABETA, CV.
Suryawati, C. (2005). Memahami kemiskinan secara multidimensional. JMPK, 08(03), 121–129.
Susilowati, S. H., & Maulana, M. (2012). Luas Lahan Usahatani dan Kesejahteraan Petani : Eksistensi Petani Gurem dan Urgensi Kebijakan Reforma Agraria Farm Business Land Size a nd Farmers ’ Welfare : Smallholders ’ Existence and Agrarian Reform Urgency Lahan pertanian dewasa ini menghadapi tanta. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 10(1), 28.
Tahir, R., Rosanna, & Djunais, I. (2019). Dampak Modernisasi Pertanian Terhadap Petani Kecil Dan Perempuan Di Sulawesi Selatan. Agrokompleks, Volume 19, Nomor 2, Juni 2019, 19(2), 35–44.
Utama, M. S. (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Kuantitatif. Edisi Kelima. Diktat Kuliah Pada Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Udayana.
Wardhiani, W. F. (2019). Peran Politik Pertanian Dalam Pembangunan Pertanian Menghadapi Era Revormasi Industri 4.0 Di Sektor Pertanian. JURNAL Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 3(2), 83–94.
Yunita, E. D. (2016). Hubungan antara hambatan partisipasi masyarakat dengan efektivitas pengelolaan kawasan wisata gunung bromo, jawa timur eka desi yulia. IPB.