The Imperative of Upholding Academic Integrity in the Face of Artificial Intelligence Challenges

Authors

Keywords:

scientific writing, artificial intellegence , ChatGPT

Abstract

Effective scholarly communication, whether oral or written, is inherently challenging. Scientific discourse relies on objective facts rather than subjective opinions. Hence, it necessitates grounding in evidence derived from research, ensuring the arguments presented are objective and supported by factual findings. Generating scholarly information, even in a single sentence, is a laborious process, demanding considerable time, financial resources, and substantial energy. In some instances, continuous or multi-year research is imperative.

Nevertheless, technological advancements have revolutionized this landscape. Writing can now be expedited through the use of available artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, ranging from free versions to premium services. For example, Jenni AI functions akin to a "magical assistant," generating text on requested topics. ELICIT AI excels in grid synthesis, ResearchPal automates literature reviews, and others provide various functionalities. This poses a temptation to researchers, making AI a double-edged sword in the realm of publication integrity.

References

Hosseini, M., Resnik, D. B., & Holmes, K. (2023). The ethics of disclosing the use of artificial intelligence tools in writing scholarly manuscripts. Research Ethics, 19(4). 449-465. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470161231180449

İmre, O. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Article Writing. European Journal of Therapeutics, 29(4), 988-989. https://doi.org/10.58600/eurjther1706

Salvagno, M., Taccone, F. S., & Gerli, A. G. (2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care, 27(1). 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2

Downloads

Published

2024-02-28 — Updated on 2024-02-27

Versions