Submissions

Login or Register to make a submission.

Submission Preparation Checklist

As part of the submission process, authors are required to check off their submission's compliance with all of the following items, and submissions may be returned to authors that do not adhere to these guidelines.

Author Guidelines

Guideline for Preparing Manuscript

Types of paper 

  1. Original research papers. Research articles that have not been published previously may be submitted as regular papers/original research papers. The word limit is 8000 words (but not restricted), excluding Tables, Figures, and References.
  2. Review papers. Review papers exist for the expression of opinions and allow authors to submit material that may not be appropriate for original research articles but which contains ideas worthy of publication, which include a letter from the Editor or letter to the Editor
  3. Policy forum. The policy forum format encourages submissions from researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers. Researchers long engaged on a particular issue that has identified emerging trends or critical elements of an issue, practitioners noticing issues overlooked among the research community, or policy-makers that have particular insights into the design, application, and implementation of a policy are encouraged to submit through this format to shape research and policy agendas going forward. Envisioned as a shorter format that focuses on these emerging trends, policy forum submissions should target 1,500 - 3,000 words. Submissions will undergo a peer-review process.

    The suggested outline for submissions should initially focus on a brief introduction about the issue at hand, present the authors' overall reliability or authority on the topic, and present the relevance for contemporary debates on critical issues of environment-society relations going forward in Southeast Asia.
  4. Notes from the field. Research contexts in South-East Asia -- including geographical, linguistic, and cultural dimensions -- can be particularly challenging given the region's breadth and diversity. Notes from the field provide a format for researchers interested in sharing their fieldwork experiences and raising critical questions about data collection complexities. This format aims to exchange different experiences on fieldwork, encourage more rigorous discussions about the researcher's role and various approaches to collecting data, and raise essential discussions about ethical considerations. The suggested format is a 1,500 - 6,000 words reflective narrative in which ethical, methodological, empirical, and other problems and solutions are presented.   

    The suggested outline should begin by providing a brief introduction about the research, followed by a description of the research method(s), and focus on the fieldwork issue raised. 
  5. Methodological engagement. The boundaries between the different scientific disciplines have faded over the years. With the arrival of new technologies, there has been increasing innovation in approaching research in new ways for both communications and research applications. As a format, methodological engagement encourages submissions that provide insight and direction about creative ways of tackling complex research problems. In this format, we envision the cross-pollination of disciplines from social, political, ecological, spatial, economic, and others to trigger new debates and generate research ideas across a fraught research field with complexity. The format is open to creative interpretation, but we suggest guidelines of between 1,500 - 3,000 words. 

    The suggested outline should begin with a brief introduction about the research topic, the interwoven research traditions, methodological challenges, and the potential delivery of research outcomes.
  6. Special Section: Section that invites original research papers and article reviews for specific themes. A special section enables us to publish papers focusing on specific themes, often related to a "hot topic." 

    The Reports section consists of brief factual summaries of research and reports from institutions. Reports and Review Papers should comprise 500-5000 words.
  7. Book Reviews. Book reviews should comprise 800-2000 words on new books, software, and videos relevant to the scope of Forest and Society. 
  8. Conference Reports. Reports on significant conferences of particular interest to Forest and Society, approximately 1000-2000 words.
  9. Forthcoming meetings. Notices of forthcoming meetings for listing in the Calendar section are welcomed. Entries must be received at least three months before publication.

Guideline for Online Submission

An author should first register as Author and/or is offered as Reviewer through the following address: https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/fs/user/register?source=  

The Author should fulfill the form as detail as possible where the star marked form must be entered. After all form textbox was filled, the Author clicks on the “Register” button to proceed with the registration. Therefore, Author is brought to the online author submission interface where Author should click on “New Submission”. In the Start, a New Submission section, click on “Click Here’: to go to step one of the five-step submission processes.” The following are five steps in the online submission process:

  1. Step 1 - Starting the Submission: Select the appropriate journal section, i.e., Original Research Articles or Review Articles. Thus, Author must check-mark on the submission checklists.
  2. Step 2 – Uploading the Submission: To upload a manuscript to this journal, click Browse on the Upload submission file item and choose the manuscript document file to be submitted, then click the Upload button. 
  3. Step 3 – Entering Submission’s Metadata: In this step, detailed authors' metadata should be entered, including the marked corresponding author. After that, the manuscript title and abstract must be uploaded by copying the text and paste it into the textbox, including keywords.
  4. Step 4 – Uploading Supplementary Files: Supplementary files could be uploaded, including Covering/Submission Letter, additional data (if needed). Therefore, click on the Browse button, choose the files, and then click on the Upload button.
  5. Step 5 – Confirming the Submission: The author should make a final check of the uploaded manuscript documents in this step. To submit the manuscript to Forest and Society, click the Finish Submission button after the documents are correct. The corresponding Author or the principal contact will receive an acknowledgment by email and will be able to view the submission’s progress through the editorial process by logging in to the journal web address site. 

By submitting your article to Forest and Society, you and all co-authors of your submission agree to the terms of this license. You do not need to fill out a copyright form for confirmation. Please see the Copyright Notice.

After this submission, the Authors who submit the manuscript will get a confirmation email about the submission. Therefore, Authors can track their submission status at any time by logging in to the online submission interface. Submission tracking includes the status of the manuscript review and editorial process.

Please note that the Editor will determine the category of each article submission

Formatting requirements 

The manuscript should be typed using word processors (preferably Microsoft Word) software. Please keep the word accounts as short as possible. Keep the layout of the text as simple as possible as well.

There are no strict formatting requirements, but all manuscripts must contain the essential elements needed to convey your manuscript, for example, Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Conclusions, Artwork and Tables with Captions.

If your article includes any Videos and/or other Supplementary material, this should be included in your initial submission for peer review purposes.

Title: This is your opportunity to attract the reader’s attention. Remember that readers are the potential authors who will cite your article. Identify the central issue of the paper. Begin with the subject of the paper. The title should be accurate, unambiguous, specific, and complete. Do not contain infrequently-used abbreviations.

 

Article structure

Divide your article into clearly defined and numbered sections. Subsections should be numbered 1.1 (then 1.1.1, 1.1.2, ...), 1.2, etc. (the abstract is not included in section numbering). Use this numbering also for internal cross-referencing: do not just refer to 'the text.' Any subsection may be given a brief heading. Each heading should appear on its separate line. 

Authors Name and Affiliations
Write Author(s) names without title and professional positions such as Prof, Dr, Production Manager, etc. Do not abbreviate your last/family name. Always give your First and Last names. If you have a one-word name such as Isehu, write Isehu Isehu. Write a clear affiliation of all Authors. Affiliation includes department/unit, (faculty), name of university, address, country. Please indicate Corresponding Author (include email address) behind the name.

Author addresses are superscripted by numerals and centered over both columns of manuscripts.

Abstract 
The abstract should be clear, concise, and descriptive. This abstract should provide a brief introduction to the paper's problem, followed by a statement regarding the methodology and a summary of results. The abstract should end with a comment on the significance of the results or a brief conclusion. Abstracts are preferably not more than 300 words.

Keywords
A maximum of 8 keywords separated by a semicolon (;), crucial to the papers' appropriate indexing, are to be given. e.g: policy; ecology conservation; economics; interest.

Introduction 
The introduction part (recommended length: 500-1000 words) gives the reader an enticing glimpse of what is to come. It must grab the reader’s attention by stimulating attention, interest, desire, and action. In other words, the introduction must effectively “sell” the manuscript.

The introduction generally consists of: a broad statement about the theme or topic of the study; summary of available works of literature and cites the most important studies that are relevant to the current research; a statement about controversies, gaps, inconsistencies in the literature that the current study will address; a statement about problems/questions to be addressed in the study or objectives of the study. You can also state at the end of the introduction outline of the rest of the article's structure.

Materials and Methods
The materials and methods section describes materials used in research and steps followed in the study's execution. A brief justification for the method used is also stated so the readers can evaluate the appropriateness of the method, reliability, and validity of the results.

Results
Results should be clear and concise. The results should summarize (scientific) findings rather than provide data in great detail. Please highlight differences between your results or findings and the previous publications by other researchers.

The discussion should explore the significance of the results of the work, not repeat them. Separation or combination of the Results and Discussion section is accepted. Avoid extensive citations and discussion of published literature.

Discussion
The discussion section is the most crucial section of your article. Here you get the chance to sell your data. Make the discussion corresponding to the results, but do not reiterate the results. Often should begin with a summary of the leading scientific findings (not experimental results). The following components should be covered in the discussion: How do your results relate to the original question or objectives outlined in the Introduction section (what)? Do you provide an interpretation scientifically for each of your results or findings presented (why)? Are your results consistent with what other investigators have reported (what else)? Or are there any differences? 

Tables and Figures
All figures and tables should be cited in the main text as Figure 1, Table 1, etc.

Tables are sequentially numbered with the table title and number above the table. Tables should be centered in the column OR on the page. Tables should be followed by a line space. Elements of a table should be single-spaced; however, double spacing can show groupings of data or separate parts within the table. Tables are referred to in the text by the table number. e.g., Table 1. Do not show a vertical line in the table. There is only a horizontal line that should be shown within the table.

Figures are sequentially numbered, commencing at 1 with the figure title and number below the figure, as shown in Figure 1. Detailed recommendations for figures are as follows:

Ensure that figures are clear and legible with typed letterings.

Black & white or colored figures are allowed.

Hard copy illustrations should, preferably, be scanned and included in the electronic version of the submission in an appropriate format. 

Equations
Equations should be numbered serially within parentheses, as shown in Equation (1). The Equation should be prepared using MS Equation Editor (not in image format). The equation number is to be placed at the extreme right side.            

Units, Abbreviations, and Symbols
Metric units are preferred. Define abbreviations and symbols for the first time as they are introduced in the text.

Conclusions 
Conclusions should answer the objectives of the research. Tells how your work advances the field from the present state of knowledge. Without clear Conclusions, reviewers and readers will find it difficult to judge the work and whether or not it merits publication in the journal. Do not repeat the Abstract or just list experimental results. Provide a clear scientific justification for your work, and indicate possible applications and extensions. You should also suggest future works and/or policy implications.

Author Contributions: For research articles with several authors, a short paragraph specifying their individual contributions could be provided. The following statements should be used “X.X. and Y.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; X.X. performed the experiments; X.X. and Y.Y. analyzed the data; W.W. contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools; Y.Y. wrote the paper.” Authorship must be limited to those who have contributed substantially to work reported.

Conflicts of Interest: Declare conflicts of interest or state “The authors declare no conflict of interest." Authors must identify and declare any personal circumstances or interests that may be perceived as inappropriately influencing the representation or interpretation of reported research results. Any role of the funding sponsors in the study's design; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results must be declared in this section. If there is no role, please state, “The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results.”

Acknowledgment: Recognize those who helped in the research, especially funding supporters of your research. Include individuals who have assisted you in your study: Advisors, Financial supporters, or may other supporters, i.e., Proofreaders, Typists, and Suppliers who may have given materials. 

Footnotes
Footnotes should be used sparingly. Number them consecutively throughout the article. Many word processors can build footnotes into the text, and this feature may be used. Do not include footnotes in the Reference list.

Appendix 
The appendix is an optional section that can contain details and data supplemental to the main text. For example, explanations of experimental details that would disrupt the flow of the main text, but nonetheless remain crucial to understanding and reproducing the research shown; figures of replicates for experiments of which representative data is shown in the main text can be added here if brief, or as Supplementary data. Mathematical proofs of results not central to the paper can be added as an appendix.

All appendix sections must be cited in the main text. In the appendixes, Figures, Tables, etc., should be labeled starting with ‘A’, e.g., Figure A1, Figure A2, etc.

References
There are no strict requirements on reference formatting at submission, but we encourage using APA citation output. References can be in any style or format as long as the style is consistent. Where applicable, author(s) name(s), journal title/book title, chapter title/article title, year of publication, volume number/book chapter, and the pagination must be present.

This weblink https://bowvalleycollege.libguides.com/apa-style/article-nodoi or https://apastyle.apa.org/style-grammar-guidelines/references/examples, that explaining APA citation could be useful. Use of DOI is highly encouraged. The journal's reference style will be applied to the accepted article by the Editor at the proof stage. Note that missing data will be highlighted at the proof stage for the Author to correct. Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Unpublished results and personal communications are not recommended in the reference list but may be mentioned in the text. Please use Reference Manager Applications like EndNote, Mendeley, Zotero, etc. Use other published articles in the same journal as models. All publications cited in the text should be included as a list of references. References are listed alphabetically. Please ensure that every reference cited in the text is also present in the reference list (and vice versa). Please see the example below for commonly used references.

  • Journal Article
    Lastname, Firstname. (Published year). The Title of Article: Capitalizes Every First Word. Journal Name: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style, Volume(Issue), first page-last page. https://doi.org/10.xxx/yyyyyy
  • Book
    Lastname, Firstname. (Published year). The Title of Book: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style. Publisher.
  • Book chapter
    Lastname, Firstname. (Published year). The Title of Book Chapter: Capitalizes Every First Word. In A. Editor & B. Editor (Eds.), The Title of Book: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style (first page-last page of the chapter). Publisher.
  • Dissertation/Thesis
    • Published
      Lastname, Firstname. (Published year). The Title of Dissertation/Thesis: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style. (Publication ID/number) [Doctoral dissertation/Master thesis, University Name]. Publisher.
    • Unpublished
      Lastname, Firstname. (Published year). The Title of Dissertation/Thesis: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation/Master Thesis]. University Name.
  • Conference Proceeding
    Lastname, Firstname. (Published year). The Title of Article: Capitalizes Every First Word. Conference Proceeding Name: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style, Volume(Issue), first page-last page. https://doi.org/10.xxx/yyyyyy
  • Working Paper
    Lastname, Firstname. (Published year). The Title of Paper: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style. Paper Name, No. XX. Publisher. Available at http://website.com/full
  • Government Agency or Organization Report
    Name of Agency or Organization. (Published year). The Title of Report: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style. Publisher/Name of Agency or Organization. Retrieved from http://website.com/full
  • Website/Webpage
    Lastname, Firstname. (Published date). The Title of Paper: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style. Webpage Name. http://website.com/full
  • News Webpage
    Lastname, Firstname. (Published date). The Title of Paper: Capitalizes Every First Word and Using Italic Style. News Name. http://newsname.com/full

To simply follow our journal's guidelines, please download this TEMPLATE, and replace the content with your own material. 

Forest and Society have a policy of screening for plagiarism. We use Anti-Plagiarism Software Turnitin to check the authenticity of the article

Regular Research Articles

Regular research articles which have not been published previously, except in a preliminary form, may be submitted as regular papers/original research papers. The word limit is 8000 words (but not restricted), excluding Tables, Figures and Reference.

Review Articles

Review papers exists for the expression of opinions, and allows authors to submit material which may not be appropriate for original research articles but which contains ideas worthy of publication.

Policy forum

The policy forum format encourages submissions from researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers. Researchers long engaged on a particular issue that have identified emerging trends or key elements of an issue, practitioners noticing issues overlooked among the research community, or policymakers that have particular insights into the design, application, and implementation of a policy, are encouraged to submit through this format to shape research and policy agendas going forward. Envisioned as a shorter format that focuses on these emerging trends, policy forum submissions should target 1,500 - 3,000 words. Submissions will undergo a peer review process. 

The suggested outline for submissions should initially focus on a brief introduction about the issue at hand, present the overall reliability of the authors knowledge or authority on the topic, and present the relevance for contemporary debates on key issues of  environment-society relations going forward in Southeast Asia.

 

Notes from the Field

Research contexts in South-East Asia -- including geographical, linguistic and cultural dimensions -- can be particularly challenging given the breadth and diversity across the region. Notes from the field provides a format for researchers that are interested in sharing their field work experiences and raising key questions about the complexities of data collection. The goal of this format is to exchange different experiences on field work, to encourage more rigorous discussions about the role of the researcher and various approaches to collecting data, as well as raising important discussions about ethical considerations. The suggested format is a 1,500 - 3,000 words reflective narrative in which ethical, methodological, empirical and other problems and solutions are presented. 

The suggested outline should begin by providing a brief introduction about the research, followed by a description of the research method(s), and focuses the content about the fieldwork issue that is being raised.

Methodological Engagement

The boundaries between the different scientific disciplines have faded over the years. With the arrival of new technologies, for both communications and research applications, there have been increasing innovation on approaching research in new ways. Methodological engagement, as a format, encourages submissions that provide insight and direction about creative ways to tackling complex research problems. In this format we envision the cross-pollination of disciplines from social, political, ecological, spatial, economic, and others to trigger new debates and generate research ideas across a research field that is fraught with complexity. The format is open to creative interpretation but we suggest guidelines of between 1,500 - 3,000 words. 

The suggested outline should begin with a brief introduction about the research topic, the research traditions that are interwoven, and focuses on the methodological challenges, and the potential delivery of research outcomes.

Reports

The Reports section consists of brief factual summaries of research and reports from institutions. Reports and Review Papers should comprise 500-5000 words.  

Book Review

Book reviews should comprise 800-2000 words on new books, software and videos relevant to the scope of Forest and Society

Conference Reports

Reports on major conferences of particular interest to Forest and Society, approximately 1000-2000 words

Forthcoming Meetings

Notices of forthcoming meetings for listing in the Calendar section are welcomed. Entries must be received at least three months before publication.

Special Section: Evaluating the Impacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services in Vietnam

Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) was first piloted in Vietnam in 2008 and nationally scaled out in 2010. PFES contributes to an astounding 22% of annual investments in the forestry sector in Vietnam, and is also considered by government as one of the main breakthrough policies in the sector during the past decade. Nevertheless, although PFES has gained significant achievements since it was first rolled out in 2008, the lack of rigorous and research-based approaches to assessing the effectiveness of PFES impacts, particularly in its relations to environment and livelihoods, makes it difficult to confirm the current status of its implementation.

Special Section on Land, livelihoods, and change amidst the COVID-19 pandemic in Southeast Asia

This special section of Forest and Society seeks out papers that examine in greater depth how livelihoods and the environment are changing, and might continue to reshape the future of Southeast Asia. 

The Future of Tanah Papua

Forest and Society is seeking submissions on the multiple layers of adat, conservation, and development issues in Tanah Papua. What questions do we need to ask for science and policy? What decisions, policies, and programs should be promoted to achieve appropriate balance between economic development, conservation, and sustainability? How can these decisions be shaped by the right actors, premised on the best available information, and developed through appropriate forums that encourage broad participation and transparency?

Types of contributions:

We are especially eager to receive contributions that explore the notion of futures, how we assess alternative trajectories, and the role of the next generation of land, development, and conservation in Tanah Papua. We anticipate the main contributions to be full length papers between 6,000 – 9,000 words. However, to encourage more diverse perspectives on these issues,  and accommodate the increasing trend toward research co-production, we are expanding submissions to incorporate shorter pieces (1,000 – 3,000 words) under targeted headings, including Policy Forum, Field Notes, and Methodological Engagement.

 

  • Policy Forum pieces should be short and to the point, addressing a particular aspect about contemporary regulatory, administrative, and other aspects of public policy specific to Tanah Papua.
  • Field Notes are intended to provide field insights into development, adat, and conservation as experienced among and by communities. This could include ethnobiological reflections, participatory mapping initiatives, local institutional practices and perspectives, and a range of other possibilities.
  • Methodological Engagement are submissions designed at identifying some of the unique challenges and realities of conducting research on these timely topics in Tanah Papua. Such methodological perspectives can bridge both the academic and the practical, and is geared towards supporting various stakeholders in evaluating the many elements and dynamics, as well as innovations for conducting meaningful research in Tanah Papua.

Applications of remote sensing technology for forest management and conservation

Opportunities to use remote sensing data for forest management and monitoring have greatly expanded in recent years. Rapid increases in satellite data availability and computing power have made large-scale, near-real time monitoring of land use change possible and affordable. The use of portable technologies, such as drone-mounted sensors, has also expanded, allowing researchers and practitioners to quickly capture detailed information about forest landscapes, often at relatively low costs compared to traditional survey methods.

To fully understand the impact these technological advances are having on forest management and conservation, research examining how remote sensing tools are used on the ground is needed. Forest and Society is initiating a call to papers aimed at investigating the use of remote sensing technologies and products in the management and conservation of forests in Southeast Asia. We are seeking studies that investigate how remote sensing data informs forest policy, land use planning, law enforcement, and conservation at national, sub-national, and local scales. These could range from analyses of national forest monitoring systems to local case studies exploring how conservation practitioners utilize remote sensing data in their work. We also invite remote sensing scientists to submit papers discussing the products and tools they are developing and their potential applications. Papers discussing current gaps or challenges related to the adoption of remote sensing technologies are also welcome.

We hope to include work from a diverse range of authors, including researchers and students from various academic fields as well as policy makers, forestry and conservation practitioners, citizen scientists, and others. In additional to original research articles, Forest and Society also seeks short articles (1,500-3,000 words) for our other submission categories: Policy Forum, Notes from the Field, and Methodological Engagement. For Policy Forum pieces, we invite authors, including researchers, practitioners, and policy-makers, to discuss issues at the intersection of remote sensing and policy. Articles discussing how remote sensing data could be used to inform policy agendas and/or facilitate enforcement of existing policies could be appropriate for this submission type. Notes from the Field aims to collect submissions from researchers and practitioners interested in sharing their fieldwork experiences. We invite submissions discussing how authors use remote sensing data in the field, as well as challenges in adopting remote sensing technologies or gaps in the types of tools currently available. The Methodological Engagement format provides authors the opportunity to discuss new and creative research approaches. This could include articles discussing new advances in remote sensing technology, opportunities for mixed methods research that integrates remote sensing with other research techniques, or articles discussing the limitations of remote sensing as a research tool.

Special Section on community-based conservation in the Wallacea region

We seek entries on a broad set of topics connected to the theme of community-based conservation in the Wallacea region. We invite research engagement on the following question: What are the practices, opportunities, and challenges for community‐based conservation in Wallacea? This line of inquiry also opens up the opportunities for entries from a broad range of backgrounds and traditions, including conservationists, social and natural scientists, policy-makers, indigenous people and activists, resource management professionals, and other practitioners. On a level of praxis, we are especially eager to provide greater insight into the notion that on the one hand community‐based conservation has experienced increasing outside investment, but on the other, there is greater concern that community‐based conservation is not working. Is, as Berkes (2004) has noted, the emphasis on community and participation diluting the conservation agenda, and if so in what ways? Can conservation be a concept that can be separated from people, lives, and livelihoods? How do we continue to the think about people and conservation as a broad set of policies and objectives?

In this light, we are especially eager to invite a greater number of non-traditional researchers into this research effort. We have therefore expanded the volume to include opportunities to submit short insight pieces to accommodate the increasing attention on the notion of science co-production (Beier et al., 2017). The broad categories for such submissions include: Policy Forum, Field Notes, and Methodological Engagement. We envision, for example: i) Policy-makers could present papers on the latest developments on current policies enabling community-based conservation; ii) Activists and local communities could submit oral histories and other innovative approaches on, for example, emphasizing local species naming systems that highlight conservation practices; iii) NGOs and other practitioners could submit innovations on community participation and multi-stakeholder approaches; iv) Natural scientists could submit a list of species and other data accounting systems with local partnerships. These are just a few among numerous possibilities for contributions.

 

Special Section: The economies, ecologies and politics of social forestry in Indonesia

Forest and Society is initiating the first of its series on emerging trends of social forestry across Southeast Asia by examining dynamics taking place in Indonesia. The primary aim is to take stock of evidence on the rapid implementation of social forestry permits across Indonesia and to promote knowledge on the realities, achievements, challenges and pathways to sustainable strategies for the future. We invite authors from academics, researchers, students, concerned citizens, policy makers and forestry practitioners to contribute original research, on a range of methods (quantitative, qualitative, and mixed), to improve our collective understanding of social forestry in Indonesia. We invite paper submissions on politics, ecology, economy and culture. We also welcome research approaches at various scales, including review articles that take on a macro perspective or rich contextual studies of site-specific experiences, as well as comparative approaches across sites.

Flood Governance in the Asia-Pacific: Risk, Politics, and Resilience

We aim to engage theoretically and empirically on crucial issues that contribute to a greater understanding of flooding and its relationship to vulnerability and resilience in the Asia-Pacific region. This includes a critical examination of existing FRM models and practices, as well as the various dynamics and discourses reflecting the complexity of flood dynamics and corresponding governance systems.

Special Section: Agrarian transformation in Thailand - commodities, landscapes, and livelihoods

      Over the last two decades, there have been extensive discussions about the priorities and processes of agrarian and rural transformation in Thailand. The production and value systems surrounding agricultural transformation involves the overall restructuring of a subsistence-oriented economy to a market-oriented one. Agricultural households are increasingly prioritizing and becoming more dependent on intensive and specialized production of cash crops. Rural livelihoods are also relying more on off-farm income generated by local urban centers or remittances sent back from migrant workers. Although outmigration and the remittance economy has supported rural households, there are also other consequences, most evident in the scarcity and changing labor practices in agricultural sectors. This transformation is affecting rural society in perplexing ways, such as the decline in poverty rates, the increasing levels of economic differentiation, improving access to education, and the perceived withering of community solidarity. These trends of agrarian transformation reflexively interact with broader developments in Thai society, related to an increasing population, processes of urbanization, public policy interventions, natural resources limitations, and changing societal values.

      This special section attempts to provide a picture of the processes of transformation over time and examine the current conjunctures taking place across rural communities in Thailand. Our entry point is through the lens of agricultural commodities. We believe that explaining the multiple sources and effects of certain commodities in particular locations in Thailand provides distinct explanatory potential. For example, rubber, a crop originally grown in the South of Thailand has been widely introduced in the northeast region for the past 30 years, affecting local community dynamics, creating new projects, changing cultivation practices, and initiating new ways of interacting with the state and international markets. Another example is rice, an important staple crop for rural households, grown widespread across the country. Rice farmers have been directly affected by agricultural policies from various government policies in the last two decades. Currently, vast stretches of paddy fields are being converted to other cash crops. Farmers are facing new choices to choose a staple, plant cash crops, and migrate seasonally to find work in other business sectors. Other examples include agricultural commodities geared to supporting a vision of tourism, illicit agricultural production of poppies in upland and border areas, and a multitude of others. Agrarian transformation provides perplexing, contradictory, and paradoxical effects, which can at once empower and dispossess. We are open to any papers that examine agrarian transformation through the lens of longstanding or newly introduced (or lack thereof) commodities that allows for a better understanding of change taking place across Thai rural society. 

Corrigendum

 

 

Erratum

 

 

Retraction notice

 

 

Privacy Statement

The names and email addresses entered in this journal site will be used exclusively for the stated purposes of this journal and will not be made available for any other purpose or to any other party.