Managing Forest Conflicts: Perspectives of Indonesia's Forest Management Unit Directors
Versions
- 2017-04-27 (3)
- 2017-04-27 (2)
- 2017-04-27 (1)
Recent expansion of the forestry and plantation sectors in Indonesia has intensified agrarian and natural resource conflicts, and created increased awareness of the social, economic and environmental impacts of these disputes. Addressing these disputes is a critical issue in advancing Indonesia's commitment to sustainable forest management. The Forest Management Units (Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan, or KPH), have become the pivotal structural element for managing all state forests at the local level, with responsibility for conventional forest management and policy implementation (establishing management boundaries, conducting forest inventory, and developing forest management plans), as well as the legal mandate to communicate and work with indigenous people and local communities. This paper presents the results of a national survey of all currently functioning KPH units, the first of its kind ever conducted with KPH leadership, to obtain a system-wide perspective of the KPHs? role, mandate, and capacity for serving as effective intermediaries in managing forest conflicts in Indonesia. The survey results show that the KPHs are still in a very initial stage of development, and are struggling with a complex and rapidly evolving policy and institutional framework. The most common conflicts noted by respondents included forest encroachment, tenure disputes, boundary conflicts, and illegal logging and land clearing. KPH leadership views conflict resolution as among their primary duties and functions, and underscored the importance of more proactive and collaborative approaches for addressing conflict, many seeing themselves as capable facilitators and mediators. Overall, these results juxtapose a generally constructive view by KPH leadership over their role and responsibility in addressing forest management conflicts, with an extremely challenging social, institutional, and political setting. The KPHs can certainly play an important role as local intermediaries, and in some cases, as facilitative mediators in resolving local conflicts, but only with a more concerted effort from central and provincial government authorities to provide greater consistency in policies and regulations, improved policy communication, and a sustained commitment to strengthening the capacity of individual KPHs.
Adnan, H., H. Berliani, G. Hardiyanto, Suwito, and D. K. Sakti. (2015). Pemberdayaan Masyarakat melalui Kemitraan Kehutanan. The Partnership for Governance Reform, Jakarta.
Ayling, R.D., and K. Kelly. (1997). Dealing with conflict: natural resources and dispute resolution. Commonwealth Forest Review, 76 (3): 182?185.
Bae, J.S., Y.S. Kim, L.A. Fisher, M. Moeliono, and J. DeShazo. (2014). Promises and Perils of Decentralized Forest Governance: The Case of Indonesia's Forest Management Units in Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+). Society and Natural Resources, 27:1346?1354
Bannon, I., and P. Collier. (2003). Natural Resources and Violent Conflict. World Bank, Washington DC.
Brockhaus, M., K. Obidzinski, A. Dermawan, Y. Laumonier, and C. Luttrell. (2012). An overview of forest and land allocation policies in Indonesia: Is the current framework sufficient to meet the needs of REDD+?. Forest Policy and Economics, 18:30-37.
Castro, A.P., and E. Nielsen. (2001). Indigenous people and co-management: implications for conflict management. Environmental Science and Policy, 4: 229?239.
Colchester, M. (2010). Free, Prior and Informed Consent: Making FPIC work for forests and peoples. The Forest Dialogue Research Paper No. 11, Yale University, New Haven.
Collier, P., and A. Hoeffler. (2002). Greed and Grievance in Civil War. Oxford economic papers, 56(4): 563-595.
Contreras-Hermosilla, A., and C. Fay. (2005). Strengthening Forest Management in Indonesia Through Land Tenure Reform: Issues and Framework for Action. World Agroforestry Center, Bogor, Indonesia.
Davis, R., and D. M. Franks. (2014). Costs of Company-Community Conflict in the Extractive Sector. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Report No. 66. Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.
De Koning, R., D. Capistrano, Y. Yasmi, and P. Cerutti. (2008). Forest-Related Conflict: Impacts, Links and Measures to Mitigate. Rights and Resources Initiative, Washington, D.C., USA.
Deloges, C., and M. Gauthier. (1997). Community forestry and forest resource conflicts: an overview. Paper prepared for the XI World Forestry Congress, Antalya, Turkey.
Dhiaulhaq, A., D. Gritten, T. De Bruyn, Y. Yasmi, A. Zazali, and M. Silalahi. (2014). Transforming conflict in plantations through mediation: Lessons and experiences from Sumatera, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 41 (0):22-30.
Dhiaulhaq, A., T. De Bruyn, and D. Gritten. (2015). The use and effectiveness of mediation in forest and land conflict transformation in Southeast Asia: Case studies from Cambodia, Indonesia and Thailand. Environmental Science and Policy, 45 (0):132-145.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). (2000). Conflict and Natural Resource Management. FAO, Rome.
Forest Watch Indonesia. (2011). Keadaan Hutan Indonesia. Forest Watch Indonesia, Bogor Indonesia.
Gritten, D., and B. Mola-Yudego. (2011). Exploration of the relevance of geographical, environmental and socio-economic indicators regarding forest conflict types. International Forestry Review, 13 (1): 46 ? 55.
Hansen, M. C., P. V. Potapov, R. Moore, M. Hancher, S. A. Turubanova, A. Tyukavina, D. Thau, S. V. Stehman, S. J. Goetz, T. R. Loveland, A. Kommareddy, A. Egorov, L. Chini, C. O. Justice, and J. R. G. Townshend. (2013). High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change. Science 342 (6160), 850-853
Harwell, E. (2011). Forests in Fragile and Conflict-Affected States. World Bank, Washington, D.C.
Hernowo, B., and S. Ekawati (eds.). (2014). Operasionalisasi Kesatuan Pengelolaan Hutan (KPH): Langkah Awal Menuju Kemandirian. Kanisius, Jakarta.
Hellstrom, E. (2001). Conflict cultures: Qualitative comparative analysis of environmental conflicts in forestry. Silva Fennica Monographs 2.
Institute for the Policy Analysis of Conflict (IPAC). (2014). Indigenous Rights vs. Agrarian Reform in Indonesia: A Case Study from Jambi. IPAC, Jakarta. Retrieved from http://file.understandingconflict.org/file/2014/04/IPAC_Report_9_Case_Study_from_Jambi_web.pdf in February 10 2016
Jang, S.K., and J.S. Bae. (2014). New Forest Governance in Indonesia: A Forest Partnership between Forest Management Units and Local Communities. Southeast Asia Study 24 (4): 95-144
Kartodihardjo, H., Nugroho, B., Putro, H.R. (2011). Forest Management Unit Development (FMU): Concept, Legislation and Implementation. Ministry of Forestry, FORCLIME Forest and Climate Change Programme, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Kim, Y.S., J.S. Bae, L. A. Fisher, S. Latifah, M. Afifi, S.M. Lee, and I.A. Kim. (2015). Indonesia's Forest Management Units: Effective intermediaries in REDD+ implementation?. Forest Policy and Economics, 62:69-77.
Krott, K., A. Bader, C. Schusser, R. Devkota, A. Maryudi, L. Giessen, H. Aurenhammer. (2014). Actor-centered power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49: 34?42
Lee, K. (1997). Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Island Press, Covelo, California.
Maryudi, A., Citraningtyas, E. R., Purwanto, R. H., Sadono, R., Suryanto, P., Riyanto, S., & Siswoko, B. D. (2016). The emerging power of peasant farmers in the tenurial conflicts over the uses of state forestland in Central Java, Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 67, 70-75.
Ministry of Forestry (MoF). (2014). Executive Summary About Forest Management Units (February 2014). Ministry of Forestry, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Moore, C. W. (1986). The Mediation Process: Practical Strategies for Resolving Conflict. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
Ota, M. (2015). Can Forest Management Units improve the management of state forests in Indonesia's outer islands? Institutional analysis and case studies from Lampung province of Sumatra. International Forestry Review, 17(1), 76-85.
Persch-Orth, M., and E. Mwangi. (2016). Company?community conflict in Indonesia?s industrial plantation sector, CIFOR info brief, No. 143, May 2016
Republic of Indonesia (ROI). (2007). Government Regulation No. 6/2007 Forest Arrangement and Establishment of Forest Management Plan as well as Forest Exploitation (in Bahasa Indonesia). Republic of Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Sahide, M.A.K., and L. Giessen. (2015). The fragmented land use administration in Indonesia: Analysing bureaucratic responsibilities influencing tropical rainforest transformation systems. Land Use Policy, 43: 96?110.
Sahide, M. A. K., Maryudi, A., Supratman, S., & Giessen, L. (2016a). Is Indonesia utilising its international partners? The driving forces behind Forest Management Units. Forest Policy and Economics, 69, 11-20.
Sahide, M.A.K., S. Supratman, A. Maryudi, Y.S. Kim, and L. Giessen. (2016b). Decentralisation policy as recentralisation strategy: forest management units and community forestry in Indonesia, International Forestry Review, 18 (1): 78 - 95
World Bank. (2014). Towards Indonesian Land Reforms: Challenges and Opportunities. A Review of the Land Sector (Forest and Non-forest) in Indonesia, World Bank, Jakarta.
Wulan, Y.C., Y. Yasmi, C. Purba, and E. Wollenberg. (2004). Analisa Konflik Sektor Kehutanan di Indonesia 1997 ? 2003. Center for International Forestry Research, Bogor.
Yasmi, Y. (2003). Understanding conflict in the co-management of forests: The case of Bulungan Research Forest. International Forestry Review, 5(1): 38-44.
Yasmi, Y., H. Schanz, and A. Salim. (2006). Manifestation of conflict escalation in natural resource management. Environmental Science and Policy, 9: 538 ? 546.
Yasmi, Y., L. Kelley, D. Murdiyarso, and T. Patel. (2012). The struggle over Asia's forests: an overview of forest conflict and potential implications for REDD+, International Forestry Review, 14(1): 2012
Copyright (c) 2019 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
