Considerations for nursing research after the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20956/icon.v8i1.28265

Keywords:

COVID-19, nursing, research, virtual

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic impacted on nursing in a variety of ways. Many parts of the world experienced long-term lockdowns and what work could be done remotely was undertaken that way. For those nurses engaged in research activities, particularly clinical nursing research, it presented immense challenges. Questionnaire-based research had to be moved exclusively online, while interview-based research was managed using videoconference facilities and making some qualitative research approaches requiring participant observation more difficult. Being able to recruit participants for research was further challenged as researchers were unable to recruit in person and needed to resort to a multitude of online approaches such as using social media platforms. As a result of impacted recruitment, many researchers needed to report their research as being unable to meet quality measures such as sample size calculations or data saturation. This particularly impacted research students with time pressures to complete, and report on, their studies. Similarly, they needed to acknowledge in their study limitations how the pandemic had impacted on their research.

Author Biography

Lisa McKenna, [SCOPUS ID: 56231862800] La Trobe University

Professor and Head

School of Nursing and Midwifery

References

Alanazi, T. N. M., McKenna, L., Buck, M., & Alharbi, R. J. (2022). Reported effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the psychological status of emergency healthcare workers: A scoping review. Australasian Emergency Care, 25(3), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2021.10.002

Efendi, F., Aurizki, G. E., Auwalin, I., & McKenna, L. (2022). The Need for Speed: A Qualitative Study on Nurse Recruitment and Management Amidst the COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 15(August), 1809–1817. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S370758

Hameed, B. Z., Tanidir, Y., Naik, N., Teoh, J. Y. C., Shah, M., Wroclawski, M. L., Kunjibettu, A. B., Castellani, D., Ibrahim, S., da Silva, R. D., Rai, B., de la Rosette, J. J. M. C. H., TP, R., Gauhar, V., & Somani, B. (2021). Will “Hybrid” Meetings Replace Face-To-Face Meetings Post COVID-19 Era? Perceptions and Views From The Urological Community. Urology, 156, 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2021.02.001

Hlatshwako, T. G., Shah, S. J., Kosana, P., Adebayo, E., Hendriks, J., Larsson, E. C., Hensel, D. J., Erausquin, J. T., Marks, M., Michielsen, K., Saltis, H., Francis, J. M., Wouters, E., & Tucker, J. D. (2021). Online health survey research during COVID-19. The Lancet Digital Health, 3(2), e76–e77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00002-9

Ioannidis, J. P. A., Salholz-Hillel, M., Boyack, K. W., & Baas, J. (2021). The rapid, massive growth of COVID-19 authors in the scientific literature. Royal Society Open Science, 8(9). https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210389

Roberts, J. K., Pavlakis, A. E., & Richards, M. P. (2021). It’s More Complicated Than It Seems: Virtual Qualitative Research in the COVID-19 Era. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211002959

Tao, Y., Steckel, D., Klemeš, J. J., & You, F. (2021). Trend towards virtual and hybrid conferences may be an effective climate change mitigation strategy. Nature Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27251-2

Downloads

Published

2023-08-25