Making the case for institutional support on designing agroforestry technology models for rehabilitating critical lands

Andi Nuddin, Muhammad Arsyad, Muhammad Ikbal Putera, Nuringsih Nuringsih, Temesgen Tilahun Teshome


Land and forest management practices in developing countries have resulted in millions of hectares of degraded lands. This is caused by policy implementation unable to synergize between conservation-ecological goals, and the economic needs of farmer households. This study aims to showcase a model for bringing together economic and ecological interests more closely in line with one another. Furthermore, the study also presents an institutional structure of a program that could help to establish agroforestry-based land rehabilitation policies. The research employed includes a combination of Farming Income Analysis and Interpretative Structural Modeling Analysis. The results show that farming income, when employing agroforestry technology is higher than non-agroforestry approaches. Furthermore, agroforestry technology supports critical land rehabilitation and provides conditions for longer term sustainability. Therefore, a programmatic institutional approach is needed to support these dual goals. We identify that a programmatic approach would include: (1) applying conditions of an agroforestry system as a holistic structured unit, (2) improvement of farmer knowledge and skills, (3) increasing the role and capacity of relevant institutions, (4) improving coordination between sectors, (5) developing conservation agriculture systems, (6) improving bureaucratic support systems, and (7) strengthening control and supervision functions. These elements imply that implementation of agroforestry technology requires institutional support in designing policy for critical land rehabilitation, of which would have significant economic and ecological outcomes on critical lands.


Agroforestry; governance institutions; Interpretative Structural Modeling; monoculture; critical lands

Full Text:



Alao, J.S., & R.B. Shuaibu. (2013). Agroforestry Practices and Concepts in Sustainable Land Use Systems in Nigeria. Journal of Horticulture and Forestry. 5(10): 156-159. doi:

Asase, A., & D.A. Tetteh. (2010). The Role of Complex Agroforestry systems in the Conservation of Forest Tree Diversity and Structure in Southeastern Ghana. Agroforestry Systems. 79(3): 355-368. doi:

Camilli, F., A. Pisanelli., G. Seddaiu., A. Franca., V. Bondesan., A. Rosati., G.M. Moreno., A. Pantera., J.E. Hermansen, & P.J. Burgess. (2018). How local Stakeholders Perceive Agroforestry Systems: an Italian Perspective, 92(4): 849–862. doi:

Cordeiro, A.A.C., S.D. Coelho., N.C. Ramos. & J.A.A.M, Neto. (2018). Agroforestry Systems Reduce Invasive Species Richness and Diversity in the Surroundings of Protected Areas. Agroforestry Systems 92(6): 1495-1505. doi:

Didu, M.S., (2001). Analisis Posisi dan Peran Lembaga serta Kebijakan dalam Proses Pembentukan Lahan Kritis. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan. 2(1): 93-105.doi:

Duangta, K., Borisutdhi, Y., & Simaraks, S. (2018). Knowledge management of pomelo production system in Northeast Thailand: A case study of the pomelo farmer group in Ban Thaen district. Forest and Society, 2(2), 162-172. doi:

Gedgaew, C., Simaraks, S., & Rambo, A. (2018). Factors influencing long term tomato seed production under contract farming. Forest and Society, 2(2), 150-161. doi:

Moreno, G., S, Aviron., S, Berg., J.C. Duran., A. Franca., S. G, de Jalón., T. Hartel., J. Mirck., A. Pantera., J. H. N. Palma., J. A. Paulo., G. A. Re., F. Sanna., C. Thenail., A. Varga., V. Viaud., P. J. Burgess. (2018). Agroforestry Systems of High Nature and Cultural Value in Europe: Provision of Commercial Goods and Other Ecosystem Services. Agroforestry Systems 92(6): 877–891.

Hakim, L., N.R. Pamungkas., K.P. Wicaksono. & Soemarno. (2018). Conservation Osingnese Traditional Home Garden Agroforestry in Banyuwangi, East Java, Indonesia. AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science. 40(3):506-514. doi: v40i3.1605.

Hoang, L.T., J.M. Roshetko., T.P. Huu., T. Pagella. & P.N. Mai. (2017). Agroforestry - The Most Resilient Farming System for the Hilly Northwest of Vietnam. International Journal of Agriculture System (5)1: 1-23. doi:

Jalon, S.G., A. Graves.,J.H.N. Palma., A. Williams., M. Upson.P.J. Burgess. (2018). Modelling and Valuing the Environmental Impacts of Arable, Forestry and Agroforestry Systems: A Case Study. Agroforestry Systems 92(2): 1059–1073.doi:

Knapp, K.C. & P.A, Sadorsky. (2010). Economics of Agroforestry Production in Irrigated Agriculture. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 25(1): 286-306.

Mercer, D.E., G.E. Frey. & F.W. Cubbage. (2014). Economics of Agroforestry. In: Kant S, and J.R.R. Alavalapati (eds.). Hanbook of Forest Economics. Earthcan from Routledge. New York. 188-209.

Murthy, I. K., Dutta, S., Varghese. V., Joshi. P.P., & Kumar, P. (2016). Impact of Agroforestry Systems on Ecological and Socio-Economic Systems: A Review. Glob J Sci Front Res: H Environ Earth Sci, 16(5), 15-27.

Nuddin, A., Sinukaban, N., Murtilaksono, K., Alikodra, H.S. (2007). Analysis of institution system on planning and strategy of critical land on Bila Watershed management. IPB (Bogor Agricultural University).

Nuddin, A., Reskiana., Arman., S. Yusuf., Nuringsih., M. Arsyad., A. Bustan. & A. Laapo. (2018), Designing New Strategy for Enhancing Robusta Coffee Production: An Application of Interpretative Structural Modeling. International Journal Agriculture System. 6(2): 156-163.

Nuddin, A., S. Yusuf. & N.M.V. Sulianderi. (2015). An Alternative Model of Cocoa Production Institution: A Solution in Facing Asean Economic Community. International Journal Agriculture System. 3(2): 143-156.

Rahu, A. A., K. Hidayat., M. Ariyadi. & L. Hakim. (2013). Ethnoecology of Kaleka: Dayak’s agroforestry in Kapuas, Central Kalimantan Indonesia. Research Journal of Agricultureand Forestry Sciences, 1(8): 5–12.

Saxena, J.J.P. (1999). Hierarchy and Classification of Program Plan Elements Using Interpretative Structural Modeling. 5(6): 651–670.doi:

Tongkaemkaew, U., Sukkul, J., Sumkhan, N., Panklang, P., Brauman, A., & Ismail, R. (2018). Litterfall, litter decomposition, soil macrofauna, and nutrient contents in rubber monoculture and rubber-based agroforestry plantations. Forest and Society, 2(2), 138-149. doi:

Villamor, G. B., Le, Q. B., Djanibekov, U., van Noordwijk, M., & Vlek, P. L. (2014). Biodiversity in rubber agroforests, carbon emissions, and rural livelihoods: An agent-based model of land-use dynamics in lowland Sumatra. Environmental Modelling & Software, 61, 151-165.doi:



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Forest and Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

Forest and Society has been indexed/registered/mentioned in : 


View full indexing services