The politics, economies, and ecologies of Indonesia’s third generation of social forestry: An introduction to the special section

Micah R. Fisher, Ahmad Dhiaulhaq, Muhammad Alif K. Sahide

Abstract


Although Indonesia is experiencing one of the most complex transformations of social forestry policy in the world, there is a need to step back and more closely examine the politics, ecologies, and economies that provide context for its implementation. This introduction offers a synthesis of the collection of special section submissions in Forest and Society. We begin by navigating the current social forestry moment by presenting a heuristic for identifying the discourses underpinning the rapid expansion in support of social forestry schemes. These perspectives are fragmented across four continuously contested discourses: community-first, legal-first, conservation-first, and development-first. We then contextualize the historical developments that brought social forestry into its current form by laying out a genealogy of its antecedents across three distinct generations. These three generations of social forestry are roughly aligned with the overall political changes that have taken place in Indonesia, each of which engaged in their own mechanisms for defining and administering social forestry. The first generation roughly follows the period of New Order rule; a second generation began as the regime unraveled, resulting in a period of reform and restructuring of the political system. At this time,  new legal frameworks were introduced, followed by the development of new implementation mechanisms. We argue that social forestry has entered a third distinct period that is characterized by the expanding interests of numerous stakeholders to formalize permitting schemes. This third generation presents new possibilities for redefining land management on Indonesia’s vast national forests.  The contributions to this special issue shed new light on the overall implications of these changes. We divide the findings across submissions, covering broad topical engagement on the economies, ecologies, and politics at different governing scales. From these findings we suggest a course for future research, and identify key policy challenges for the future of social forestry and for Indonesia.


Keywords


community forestry; CBNRM; Indonesia; genealogy of social forestry; political forest

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and disenchantment: the role of community in natural resource conservation. World development, 27(4), 629-649.

Anderson, J., Mehta, S., Epelu, E., & Cohen, B. (2015). Managing leftovers: Does community forestry increase secure and equitable access to valuable resources for the rural poor?. Forest Policy and Economics, 58, 47-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.004

Barr, C. M., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Dermawan, A., McCarthy, J., Moeliono, M., & Setiono, B. (Eds.). (2006). Decentralization of Forest Administration in Indonesia: Implications for Forest Sustainability, Economic Development, and Community Livelihoods. CIFOR.

Bernstein, Henry, Harriet Friedmann, Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, Teodor Shanin, and Ben White. (2018). “Fifty Years of Debate on Peasantries, 1966–2016.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 45, no. 4: 689–714.

Bong, I., Moeliono, M., Wong, G., & Brockhaus, M. (2019). What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1), 1-21. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5184

Beier, Paul, Lara J Hansen, Lynn Helbrecht, and David Behar. (2017). A How‐to Guide for Coproduction of Actionable Science. Conservation Letters, 10 (3), 288–96.

Bong, I. W., Moeliono, M., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2019). What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1), 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5184

Cámara-Leret, R., Schuiteman, A., Utteridge, T., Bramley, G., Deverell, R., Fisher, L., McLeod, J., Hannah, L., Roehrdanz, P., Laman, T., Scholes, E., de Fretes, Y., and Heatubun, C. (2019). The Manokwari Declaration: Challenges ahead in conserving 70% of Tanah Papua’s forests. Forest and Society, 3(1), 148-151. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6067

Colfer, CJP & Resosudarmo, IAP (eds) (2002). Which Way Forward: ‘People, Forests, and Policymaking in Indonesia’, Routledge, Washington, D.C.

Dressler, W., Büscher, B., Schoon, M., Brockington, D.A.N., Hayes, T., Kull, C.A., McCarthy, J. and Shrestha, K. (2010). From hope to crisis and back again? A critical history of the global CBNRM narrative. Environmental conservation, 37(1), 5-15.doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000044

Fatem, S. (2019). Connecting social forestry to conservation policies in Tanah Papua. Forest and Society, 3(1), 141-147. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5865

Fisher, Micah R. (2019).“Beyond Recognition: Indigenous Land Rights and Changing Landscapes in Indonesia.” University of Hawaii at Manoa,

Fisher, M. R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Judda, J., and Sahide, M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia: recognition, livelihood and conservation?. International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346-361.https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014

Fisher, R.J. (1995). Collaborative management of forests for conservation and development. IUCN Gland, Switzerland.

Galudra, G. (2019). Focusing on facilitation: Issues and challenges of capacity development in Indonesia’s social forestry reforms. Forest and Society, 3(1), 133-136. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5995

Gilmour, DA (2016), Forty years of community-based forestry: a review of its extent and effectiveness, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.

Kamoto, J., Clarkson, G., Dorward, P. and Shepherd, D. (2013). Doing more harm than good? Community based natural resource management and the neglect of local institutions in policy development. Land Use Policy, 35, 293-301.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.06.002

Lawrence, A. (2007). Beyond the second generation: towards adaptiveness in participatory forest management. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2(28): 1−15.doi: https://doi.org/10.1079/PAVSNNR20072028

Lindayati, R. “Ideas and Institutions in Social Forestry Policy. Chapter 2 in Colfer, Carol J. Pierce, and Ida Ayu Resosudarmo (Eds.).(2002).” Which Way Forward? People, Forests, and Policymaking in Indonesia, 2002.

Lucas, A. and Warren, C. (2003). The State, the People, and Their Mediators: The Struggle over Agrarian Law Reform in Post-New Order Indonesia.” Indonesia, 2003, 87–126.

Lund, C. (2016). Rule and rupture: state formation through the production of property and citizenship. Development and Change, 47(6), 1199-1228.https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12274

Massiri, S., Nugroho, B., Kartodihardjo, H., & Soekmadi, R. (2019). Institutional Sustainability of a Community Conservation Agreement in Lore Lindu National Park. Forest and Society, 3(1), 64-76. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5204

Maryudi, A. (2011). The contesting aspirations in the forests: Actors, interests and power in community forestry in Java, Indonesia. Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Maryudi, A., Devkota, R. R., Schusser, C., Yufanyi, C., Salla, M., Aurenhammer, H., … Krott, M. (2012). Back to basics: Considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry. Forest Policy and Economics, 14(1), 1–5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2011.07.017

McCarthy, J. (2000). The changing regime: Forest property and reformasi in Indonesia. Development and Change, 31(1), 91-129. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00148

McDermott, MH, and Kate Schreckenberg. (2009). “Equity in Community Forestry: Insights from North and South.” International Forestry Review, 11(2). 157–70.doi: https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.11.2.157

Moeliono, M., Thuy, P., Waty Bong, I., Wong, G., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social Forestry - why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 78-97. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484

Myers, Rodd, Dian Intarini, Martua Thomas Sirait, and Ahmad Maryudi. (2017). Claiming the Forest: Inclusions and Exclusions under Indonesia’s ‘New’Forest Policies on Customary Forests. Land Use Policy, 66: 205–13. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.04.039

Nuddin, A., Arsyad, M., Putera, M., Nuringsih, N., & Teshome, T. (2019). Making the case for institutional support on designing agroforestry technology models for rehabilitating critical lands. Forest and Society, 3(1), 49-63. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5975

Pratama, A., Supratman, S., & Makkarennu, M. (2019). Examining forest economies: A case study of silk value chain analysis in Wajo District. Forest and Society, 3(1), 22-33. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.4912

RECOFTC (2011). RECOFTC's work is guided by the principles of clear and strong rights, good governance, and fair benefits for millions of forest-dependent people. https://archive.recoftc.org/basic-page/guiding-principles. Access on 16 April 2018

Ribot, J. C., Lund, J. F., & Treue, T. (2010). Democratic decentralization in sub-Saharan Africa: its contribution to forest management, livelihoods, and enfranchisement. Environmental Conservation, 37(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000329

Safitri, M. (2015). Dividing the Land: Legal Gaps in the Recognition of Customary Land in Indonesian Forest Areas. Kasarinlan: Philippine Journal of Third World Studies, 16(30), 2.31-48

Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Maryudi, A., Dhiaulhaq, A., Wulandari, C., Kim, Y. S., & Giessen, L. (2018a). Deadlock opportunism in contesting conservation areas in Indonesia. Land use policy, 77, 412-424.doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.020

Sahide, M.A.K, Jusuf, Y., Alam, S., Supratman., Millang, S., Mahbub, A.S., Bachtiar, B., Sabar, A., Nasri., Nursaputra, A., Ahmad, M.F., Yahya, N.H. (2018b). Kajian Dampak Perhutanan Sosial di Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Fakultas Kehutanan Universitas Hasanuddin dan Balai Perhutanan Sosial dan Kemitraan Lingkungan Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Makassar, Indonesia.

Sahide, M. A. K., Supratman, S., Maryudi, A., Kim, Y. S., & Giessen, L. (2016). Decentralisation policy as recentralisation strategy: forest management units and community forestry in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 18(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816818206168

Salampessy, M., Febryano, I., & Zulfiani, D. (2017). Bound by debt: Nutmeg trees and changing relations between farmers and agents in a Moluccan agroforestry systems. Forest and Society, 1(2), 137-143. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.1718

Suharjito, D., & Wulandari, C. (2019). A reflection of Social Forestry in 2019: Towards inclusive and collaborative government approaches. Forest and Society, 3(1), 137-140. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6099

Suhel, S., Bashir, A., & Yuliana, S. (2019). Identifying the determining factors of recreation demand in Kongar Lake of South Sumatera: An individual travel cost approach. Forest and Society, 3(1), 34-48. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5982

Supriyanto, B., Karyana, A., Tjiptono, B.H., Dwiyati, N., ….et al., (2018). Dampak Perhutanan Sosial Perspektif Ekonomo, Sosial, dan Lingkungan. Direktorat Jenderal Perhutanan Soial Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan, Jakarta

Sikor, Thomas. (2006) “Analyzing Community-Based Forestry: Local, Political and Agrarian Perspectives.” Forest Policy and Economics 8, no. 4: 339–49.

Sikor, T & Lund, C. (2009). ‘Access and Property: A Question of Power and Authority’, Development and Change, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 1–22.

Sikor, T., He, J., & Lestrelin, G. (2017). Property Rights Regimes and Natural Resources: A Conceptual Analysis Revisited. World Development, 93, 337–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.032

Tajuddin, T., Supratman, S., Salman, D., & Yusran, Y. (2019). Bridging social forestry and forest management units: Juxtaposing policy imaginaries with implementation practices in a case from Sulawesi. Forest and Society, 3(1), 97-113. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6049

Taylor, P. L. (2000). Producing more with less? Community forestry in Durango, Mexico in an era of trade liberalization. Rural Sociology, 65(2), 253-274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549- 0831.2000.tb00028.x.

Tongkaemkaew, U., Sukkul, J., Sumkhan, N., Panklang, P., Brauman, A., & Ismail, R. (2018). Litterfall, litter decomposition, soil macrofauna, and nutrient contents in rubber monoculture and rubber-based agroforestry plantations. Forest and Society, 2(2), 138-149. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v2i2.4431

Vandergeest, P & Peluso, N.L. (2015). ‘Political forests’, in R Bryant (ed.), The International Handbook of Political Ecology, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham ; Northampton, MA, viewed 31 July 2017, http://www.elgaronline.com/view/9780857936165.xml

Wiersum, K. (2004). Social and community forestry, In: Encyclopedia of forest sciences. Elsevier, pp. 1136-1143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-12-145160-7/00118-6.

Wiersum, K. F. (1997). Indigenous exploitation and management of tropical forest resources: an evolutionary continuum in forest-people interactions. Agriculture, ecosystems & environment, 63(1), 1-16.doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(96)01124-3.

Wulandari, C., & Kurniasih, H. (2019). Community preferences for social forestry facilitation programming in Lampung, Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1), 114-132. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6026

Zerner, C., (2000). People, Plants, and Justice: The Politics of Nature Conservation. Columbia University Press.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6348

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Forest and Society is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

View My Stats

INDEX ON : 

                 

View full indexing services