State-led Forest Development and Social Protest in East Nusa Tenggara Province
Additional Files
This research examines models of social resistances in response to top-down forest governance in the provincial government of East Nusa Tenggara Province, Indonesia. The researcher demonstrates the models of (1) forest management and (2) people’s resistance against the regional government.The author found three fundamental problems through the perspectives of the right to the governing authority of the state and social resistance. First, the provincial government monopolise forest management since 1982 for cattle breeding. Instead of offering prosperity to the people, this forest management model excludes the people from the forest and cattle resources. Second, when the signed contract ended, the local residents refused to extend forest management concessions to the provincial government. Third, the refusal by the residents was carried out through various forms of social movements and cultural politics. However, the provincial government mobilised the police, the civil service police, and the armed forces to intimidate the resistant communities.
Álvarez, M. D. (2003). Forests in the time of violence: conservation implications of the Colombian war. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 16(3-4), 47-68. https://doi.org/10.1300/J091v16n03_03
Ardhana, I. K. (2005). Penataan Nusa Tenggara Timur Pada Masa Kolonial 1915-1950. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Arendt, H. (1951). The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
Ataupah, H. (1992). Ekologi, Persebaran Penduduk, Dan Pengelompokan Orang Meto Di Timor Barat. Universitas Indonesia.
Biro Perekonomian Setda Provinsi Nusa Tenggara. (2012). Permasalahan Lokasi Penggemukan Sapi Di Besi Pa’e Kabupaten Timor Tengah Selatan Tahun 2012. Kupang.
Borras Jr, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2011). Towards a better understanding of global land grabbing: an editorial introduction. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(2), 209-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.559005
Borras Jr, S. M., Kay, C., Gómez, S., & Wilkinson, J. (2012). Land grabbing and global capitalist accumulation: key features in Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 33(4), 402-416. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2012.745394
Butsic, V., Baumann, M., Shortland, A., Walker, S., & Kuemmerle, T. (2015). Conservation and conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo: The impacts of warfare, mining, and protected areas on deforestation. Biological conservation, 191, 266-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.06.037
Corbetta, P. (2003). Social Research: Theory, Methods and Techniques. London: SAGE Publications.
Dako, F. X., Purwanto, R. H., Faida, L. R. W., & Sumardi, S. (2018). Firewood and Carpentry Wood Contribution to the Communities of Mutis Timau Protected Forest, Timor Island. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 24(3), 166-166. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.24.3.166
Erb, M. (2016). Mining and the Conflict over Values in Nusa Tenggara Timur Province, Eastern Indonesia. Extractive Industries and Society 3(2):370–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2016.03.003
Expontt.com. (2020). DPRD NTT Mendesak Pelaku Proses Hukum. Retrieved July 14, 2020 (http://www.expontt.com/dprd-ntt-mendesak-pelaku-proses-hukum/).
Fromm, E. (1941). Escape from Freedom. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hoffer, E. (1951). The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements. New York: Harper & Row.
Jati, W. R. (2014). Tinjauan Perspektif Intelegensia Muslim terhadap Genealogi Kelas Menengah Muslim di Indonesia. Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 9(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2014.9.1.1-29
Jati, W. R. (2015). Less cash society: Menakar mode konsumerisme baru kelas menengah Indonesia. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 14(2), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2015.14.2.1
Jenkins, J. C. (1995). The politics of social protest: Comparative perspectives on states and social movements. U of Minnesota Press.
K Alex. (2020). Pidanakan Ibu-Ibu Bertelanjang Dada Di Besipae, Biro Hukum Setda Dinilai Kurang Kerjaan. Retrieved July 14, 2020. https://www.tajukflores.com/artikel/20200/Pidanakan-Ibu-ibu-Bertelanjang-Dada-di-Besipae-Biro-Hukum-Setda-NTT-Dinilai-Kurang-Kerjaan-/
Van Klinken, G. (2015). The Making of Middle Indonesia: Kelas Menengah di Kota Kupang 1930an-1980an. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Landholm, D. M., Pradhan, P., & Kropp, J. P. (2019). Diverging forest land use dynamics induced by armed conflict across the tropics. Global Environmental Change, 56, 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.03.006
Langman, L. (2013). Occupy: A new new social movement. Current Sociology, 61(4), 510-524. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392113479749
Lewokeda, A. (2016). Masyarakat Minta Hak Kelola Hutan Adat Dikembalikan. Retrieved May 12, 2020. https://kupang.antaranews.com/berita/1122/masyarakat-minta-hak-kelola-hutan-adat-dikembalikan
Lilja, M., & Vinthagen, S. (2014). Sovereign power, disciplinary power and biopower: resisting what power with what resistance?. Journal of Political Power, 7(1), 107-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2014.889403
Neonbasu, G, ed. (2013). Kebudayaan: Sebuah Agenda Dalam Bingkai Pulau Timor Dan Sekitarnya. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Neonbasu, G. (2016). Citra Manusia Berbudaya: Sebuah Monografi Tentang Timor Dalam Perspektif Melanesia. Jakarta: Antara Publishing.
Ormeling, F. (1957). The Timor Problem: A Geographical Interpretation of an Underdeveloped Island. The Hague-Holland: J.B Wolters, Groningen and Martinus Nijhoff.
Parimartha, I. G. (2002). Perdagangan dan Politik di Nusa Tenggara 1815-1915. Jakarta: Perwakilan KITLV dan Penerbit Djambatan.
Peluso, N. L. (1991). The history of state forest management in colonial Java. Forest & Conservation History, 35(2), 65-75. https://doi.org/10.2307/3983940
della Porta D, Andretta M, Mosca L, Reiter H. (2006). Globalisation From Below: Transnational Activists and Protest Networks. London: University of Minnesota Press.
Pujiono, E., Sadono, R., & Imron, M. A. (2019a). Assessment of causes and future deforestation in the mountainous tropical forest of Timor Island, Indonesia. Journal of Mountain Science, 16(10), 2215-2231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5480-1
Pujiono, E., Sadono, R., Hartono, H., & Imron, M. A. (2019b). A three decades assessment of forest cover changes in the mountainous tropical forest of Timor Island, Indonesia. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 25(1), 51-51. https://doi.org/10.7226/jtfm. 5.1.51
Rachman, N. F. (2017). Petani Dan Penguasa: Dinamika Perjalanan Politik Agraria Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Insist Press.
Raharjo, S.A.S., Awang S. A., Pramusinto, A., & Purwanto, R. H. (2013). Sejarah Dominasi Negara Dalam Pengelolaan Cendana Di Nusa Tenggara Timur (History of State Domination on Cendana Management in Nusa Tenggara Timur). Journal of People and Environment, 20(1), 1-10.
Rosary, E. (2020a). Konflik Tanah Di Hutan Pubabu. Kenapa Masyarakat Adat Menolak Klaim Pemerintah?. Retrieved July 14, 2020. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2020/03/12/konflik-tanah-di-hutan-pubabu-kenapa-masyarakat-adat-menolak-klaim-pemerintah
Rosary, E. (2020b). Masyarakat Adat Pubabu Tolak Klaim Pemprov NTT. Kenapa?. Retrieved July 12, 2020. https://www.mongabay.co.id/2020/05/21/masyarakat-adat-pubabu-tolak-klaim-lahan-pemprov-ntt-kenapa/
Salmon, T. (2020). Aksi Telanjang Pemprov NTT Bakal Polisikan Warga Besipa’e TTS. Retrieved August 8, 2020. https://voxntt.com/2020/05/13/aksi-telanjang-pemprov-ntt-bakal-polisikan-warga-besipae-tts/62864/
Schlesinger, A. M. (1949). The Vital Center: The Politics of Freedom. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Sembiring, J. (2016). Hak menguasai negara atas sumber daya agraria. BHUMI: Jurnal Agraria dan Pertanahan, 2(2), 119-132. https://doi.org/10.31292/jb.v2i2.65
Soemardjan, S. (1984). Land Reform Di Indonesia. in Dua Abad Penguasaan Tanah: Pola Penguasaan Tanah Pertanian di Jawa dari Masa ke Masa, edited by Sediono M.P. Tjondronegoro dan Gunawan Wiradi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia-Gramedia.
Suni, E. K. (2020). Dianggap Melawan, Anak Korban Penggusuran Di Pubabu NTT Dikeluarkan Dari Sekolah. Retrieved August 24, 2020. https://regional.inews.id/berita/dianggap-melawan-anak-korban-penggusuran-di-pubabu-ntt-dikeluarkan-dari-sekolah
Tilly, C. (2004). Social Movement 1768-2004. London: Paradigm Publishers.
Tilly, C. (2006). Regimes and Repertoires. New York: The University of Chicago Press.
Tilly, C. (2008). Contentious performances. Cambridge University Press.
Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. G. (2015). Contentious Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Usbobo, Y. V. L. (2019). BUNUK: PENGETAHUAN DAN PRAKTEK ATONI-METO DALAM TATA KELOLA HUTAN. Lumen Veritatis: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi, 10(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.30822/lumenveritatis.v10i1.209
Asriyani, H., & Verheijen, B. (2020). Protecting the Mbau Komodo in Riung, Flores: Local Adat, National Conservation and Ecotourism Developments. Forest and Society, 4(1), 20-34. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i1.7465
WALHI. (2020). Kronologi Konflik Masyarakat Pubabu Dengan Pemerintah Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur. Kupang.
Yasmi, Y., Kelley, L. C., & Enters, T. (2013). Community–outsider conflicts over forests: Perspectives from Southeast Asia. Forest Policy and Economics, 33, 21-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2012.05.001
Zirakzadeh, C. E. (2006). Social Movement in Politics: A Comparative Study Expanded Edition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Copyright (c) 2021 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
