Customary Forests in West Papua: Contestation of Desires or Needs?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.13350

Keywords:

customary forest, stakeholder, West Papua, social forestry

Abstract

The challenge of integrating ecological, economic and social aspects of forest management is still a critical issue among stakeholders who agree on community-based forestry and the rights of indigenous peoples. In West Papua, the contrast of abundant natural resources with serious social inequalities and structured poverty is a continuing challenge for implementing a social forestry program. The process of establishing customary territories in West Papua is an important milestone in recognising its community entities. Is this scheme definitively able to answer the interests of access and management of indigenous peoples? This can help in achieving the sacred goal of protecting 70% of the forest area. This paper examines the dynamics of forest management in West Papua by the parties in customary forests. The low area designated for customary territories in West Papua, which has only reached 2,554.2 hectares, and the absence of a decree on the existence of customary forests is a form of injustice to the interests of local communities. The social forestry acceleration program intended to end the uncertainty surrounding customary forests is still in process. The roles of both on-site and off-site parties have not been optimal in realising customary forests in West Papua due to the complex and incomplete translation process at the site level. The results of the review show that interest is still focused on achieving an indicative-annual figure, which is still dominated by the village forest scheme. Hopefully, this year's acceleration of customary forests will become a milestone in West Papua, based on mutual need and desire.

References

Arts, B. J. M., Appelstrand, M., Kleinschmit, D., Pülzl, H., Visseren-Hamakers, I. J., Atyi, R. E. A., ... & Yasmi, Y. (2010). Discourses, actors and instruments in international forest governance. In Embracing complexity: Meeting the challenges of international forest governance. A global assessment report. Prepared by the Global Forest Expert Panel on the International Forest Regime (No. 28, pp. 57-74). International Union of Forest Research Organizations (IUFRO).

Arts, B., van Bommel, S., Ros-Tonen, M., & Verschoor, G. (Eds.). (2012). Forest People Interfaces: Understanding Community Forestry and Biocultural diversity. Springer Science & Business Media.https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-749-3

Awang, S. A. (2009). Deforestasi dan Konstruksi Pengetahuan Pembangunan Hutan Berbasis Masyarakat. Institut Hukum Sumber Daya Alam.

Brearley, F. Q., Adinugroho, W. C., Cámara-Leret, R., Krisnawati, H., Ledo, A., Qie, L., ... & Webb, C. O. (2019). Opportunities and challenges for an Indonesian forest monitoring network. Annals of forest science, 76(2), 1-12.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13595-019-0840-0

Bong, I. W., Moeliono, M., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2019). What is success? Gaps and trade-offs in assessing the performance of traditional social forestry systems in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 3(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5184

Boo, H.L., dan Wiersum, K.F., 2011. Manajemen Adaptif Sumberdaya Hutan. Penerjemah Dwiko B. Permadi. Datamedia. Yogyakarta

BPS. (2018). STATISTIK INDONESIA 2018.

Cámara-Leret, Rodrigo, Frodin DG, Adema F, Anderson C, Appelhans MS, Argent G, Guerrero SA, Ashton P, Baker WJ, Barfod AS, Barrington D, Borosova R, Bramley GLC, Briggs M, Buerki S, Cahen B, Callmander MW, Cheek M, Cheng-Wei C, Conn BJ, Coode MJE, Darbyshire I, Dawson S, Dransfield J, Drinkell C, Duyfjes B, Ebihara A, Ezedin Z, Long-Fei F, Gideon O, Girmansyah D, Govaerts R, Fortune-Hopkins H, Hassemer G, Hay A, Heatubun CD, Hind DJN, Hoch P, Homot P, Hovenkamp P, Hughes M, Jebb M, Jennings L, Jimbo T, Kessler M, Kiew R, Knapp S, Lamei P, Lehnert M, Lewis GP, Linder HP, Lindsay S, Low TW, Lucas E, Mancera JP, Monro AK, Moore A, Middleton DJ, Nagamasu H, Newman MF, Lughadha EN, Melo PHA, Ohlsen DJ, Pannell CM, Parris B, Pearce L, Penneys DS, Perrie LR, Petoe P, Poulsen AD, Prance GT, Quakenbush JP, Raes N, Rodda M, Rogers ZS, Schuiteman A, Schwartsburd P, P Scotland RW, Simmons MP, Simpson DA, Stevens P, Sundue M, Testo W, Trias-Blasi A, Turner I, Utteridge T, Walsingham L, Webber BL, Wei R, Weiblen GD, Weigend M, Weston P, de Wilde W, Wilkie P, Wilmot-Dear CM, Wilson HP, Wood JRI, Li-Bing Z, van Welzen PC. (2020). New Guinea has the world’s richest island. Nature 1-5.

Cámara-Leret, R., Schuiteman, A., Utteridge, T., Bramley, G., Deverell, R., Fisher, L. A., McLeod, J., Hannah, L., Roehrdanz, P., Laman, T. G., Scholes, E., de Fretes, Y., &Heatubun, C. (2019). The Manokwari declaration: Challenges ahead in conserving 70% of Tanah Papua’s forests. Forest and Society, 3(1), 148–151. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.6067

CIFOR, (2017a). Perhutanan Sosial dan Tata Cara Permohonannya. https://www.cifor.org/library/6589/perhutanan-sosial-dan-tata-cara-permohonannya diakses pada tanggal 31 Mei 2021.

CIFOR, (2017b). Bagan Alir Permohonan Hutan Adat Kepada Menteri LHK. diunduh pada https://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/posters/GCS-Tenure/7_HA-Menteri.pdf.

Fatem, S. M., Awang, S. A., Pudyatmoko, S., Sahide, M. A. K., Pratama, A. A., & Maryudi, A. (2018). Camouflaging economic development agendas with forest conservation narratives: A strategy of lower governments for gaining authority in the re-centralising Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 78(July), 699–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.07.018

Fatem, S. M. (2019). Connecting social forestry to conservation policies in Tanah Papua. Forest and Society, 3(1), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5865

Harrison, M. E., Ottay, J. B., D’Arcy, L. J., Cheyne, S. M., Anggodo, Belcher, C., Cole, L., Dohong, A., Ermiasi, Y., Feldpausch, T., Gallego‐Sala, A., Gunawan, A., Höing, A., Husson, S. J., Kulu, I. P., Soebagio, S. M., Mang, S., Mercado, L., Morrogh‐Bernard, H. C., … Veen, F. J. F. (2020). Tropical forest and peatland conservation in Indonesia: Challenges and directions. People and Nature, 2(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10060

Kementerian Lingkungan Hidup dan Kehutanan. (2019). Laporan Kinerja 2019.

Maini, J.S. (2003). International dialogue on forests: impact on national policies and practices. In: Teeter L, Cashore B, Zhang D (eds) Forest policy for private forestry – global and regional challenges. CAB International, Wallingford, pp 9–15. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851995991.0009

Marshall, A.J., Beehler, B.M., Kartikasar, S.N., (2007). Ekologi Papua, Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia dan Conservation International.

Maryudi, A., (2015). Rejim Politik Kehutanan International, Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Matthews, N., & Missingham, B. (2009). Social accountability and community forest management: The failure of collaborative governance in the wombat forest. Development in Practice, 19(8), 1052–1063. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520903220800

O’brien, K., Eriksen, S., Nygaard, L. P., & Schjolden, A. (2007). Why different interpretations of vulnerability matter in climate change discourses. Climate Policy, 7(1), 73-88.https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2007.9685639

Pitoyo, A. J., Listyaningsih, U., & Alfana, M. A. F. (2019). The Livelihood of Non-Resident Households in the Oil and Gas Mining Areas in Papua. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 256(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/256/1/012033

Purnomo, H., (2012). Pemodelan dan simulasi untuk pengelolaan adaptif sumberdaya alam dan lingkungan., Bogor: IPB Press

Ragandhi, A., Hadna, A. H., Setiadi, S., & Maryudi, A. (2021). Why do greater forest tenure rights not enthuse local communities? An early observation on the new community forestry scheme in state forests in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(1), 159–166. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.11723

Rickenbach, M., Zeuli, K., & Sturgess-Cleek, E. (2005). Despite failure: The emergence of “new” forest owners in private forest policy in Wisconsin, USA. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 20(6), 503–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580500434806

Runtuboi, Y. Y., B. Permadi, D., Sahide, M. A. K., & Maryudi, A. (2021). Oil Palm Plantations, Forest Conservation and Indigenous Peoples in West Papua Province: What Lies Ahead? Forest and Society, 5(April), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.11343

Siscawati, M., Banjade, M. R., Liswanti, N., Herawati, T., Mwangi, E., Wulandari, C., Tjoa, M., & Silaya, T. (2017). Overview of forest tenure reforms in Indonesia. In Overview of forest tenure reforms in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006402

Toman, M. A., & Ashton, P. M. S. (1996). Sustainable forest ecosystems and management: A review article. Forest Science, 42(3), 366–377. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/42.3.366

Ungirwalu A, Awang S.A, Maryudi A, Priyono S., 2019. Konstruksi Hutan-Budaya: Skenario pengelolaan sumberdaya alam adaptif hasil hutan bukan kayu (HHBK) Berbasis Masyarakat Adat Di Papua Barat. Disertasi UGM

Wibowo, A., Muhajir, M., & Nadya, D. (2019). Opini Hukum Peraturan Menteri Nomor P.21/Menlhk-Setjen/Kum.1/4/2019 tentang Hutan Adat dan Hutan Hak.

Additional Files

Published

2021-07-18

How to Cite

Customary Forests in West Papua: Contestation of Desires or Needs? (2021). Forest and Society, 5(2), 365-375. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.13350

Similar Articles

1-10 of 208

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)