A Pilot Model of Community-based Forest Management in Xuan Nha Nature Reserve, Son La Province, Vietnam
Additional Files
This study evaluated the implementation of a pilot model for promoting community-based conservation through a contracting program in Xuan Nha Nature Reserve, located in Son La province, northern Vietnam, from 2014 to 2022. To assess the effectiveness of the program, in-depth interviews were conducted with 26 officials and 100 individuals residing in three villages. The findings revealed that the program successfully facilitated community-based conservation by involving local communities in participatory land use planning and forest protection at the village level. The study identified four main factors that contributed to the successful implementation of the program: (1) clearly defined objectives, (2) the establishment of a stable rule system, (3) garnering support from local people, and (4) promoting associated activities. Given these positive outcomes, this model can be applied and scaled-up throughout Vietnam, particularly in areas where local communities coexist within protected areas.
Acheson, J. M. (2006). Institutional failure in resource management. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 117-134. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35. 081705.123238
Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, M. A. (2013). Robustness of social‐ecological systems: implications for public policy. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 513-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12027
Andrade, G. S., & Rhodes, J. R. (2012). Protected areas and local communities: an inevitable partnership toward successful conservation strategies? Ecology and Society, 17(4), 1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-05216-170414
Bartlett, A. (2018). Factors affecting the success of collaborative forestry research in Papua New Guinea. Australian Forestry, 81(2), 116-128. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00049158.2018.1462546
Baynes, J., Herbohn, J., Smith, C., Fisher, R., & Bray, D. (2015). Key factors which influence the success of community forestry in developing countries. Global Environmental Change, 35, 226-238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha. 2015.09.011
Boissière, M., Sheil, D., Basuki, I., Wan, M., & Le, H. (2009). Can engaging local people’s interests reduce forest degradation in Central Vietnam? Biodiversity and conservation, 18, 2743-2757. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-009-9627-1
Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Healey, J. R., Jones, J. P., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2012). Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1890/110040
Brockington, D., Duffy, R., & Igoe, J. (2008). Nature unbound: conservation, capitalism and the future of protected areas: Earthscan.
Duguma, L. A., Atela, J., Ayana, A. N., Alemagi, D., Mpanda, M., Nyago, M., . . . Ntamag-Ndjebet, C. N. (2018). Community forestry frameworks in sub-Saharan Africa and the impact on sustainable development. Ecology and society, 23(4), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-10514-230421
Fedreheim, G. E., & Blanco, E. (2017). Co-management of protected areas to alleviate conservation conflicts: Experiences in Norway. International Journal of the Commons, 11(2), 754-773. https://doi.org/10.18352/ijc.749
Griffin, C., & Meshack, D. (2002). Displacement and Forced Settlement: Gypsies in Tamilnadu. In D. Chatty & M. Colchester (Eds.), Conservation and Mobile Indigenous Peoples: Displacement, Forced Settlement and Sustainable Development (pp. 261–276). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j. ctt1btbx2j.21
Guignier, A., & Rieu-Clarke, A. (2012). Country report Vietnam: Payment for environmental services. IUCN-Academy of Environmental Law e-Journal, 1, 251-259.
Kartodihardjo, H., Nagara, G., & Situmorang, A. W. (2015). Transaction cost of forest utilization licenses: institutional issues. Jurnal Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 21(3), 184-191. http://dx.doi.org/10.7226/jtfm.21.3.184
MacKinnon, K. (2001). ICDPs: Imperfect solutions for imperiled forests in South-east Asia. Parks, 11, 50-59. https://doi.org/10.3759/tropics.17.147
Massiri, S. D., Nugroho, B., Kartodihardjo, H., & Soekmadi, R. (2019). Institutional sustainability of a community conservation agreement in Lore Lindu National Park. Forest and Society, 3(1), 64-76. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.5204
McElwee, P. (2002). Lost Worlds and Local People: Protected Areas Development in Viet Nam. In D. Chatty & M. Colchester (Eds.), Conservation and Mobile Indigenous Peoples: Displacement, Forced Settlement and Sustainable Development (pp. 296–312). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1btbx2j.23
McElwee, P. D. (2003). ‘Lost worlds’ or ‘lost causes’? Biodiversity conservation, forest management, and rural life in Vietnam: Yale University.
McLean, J., & Straede, S. (2003). Conservation, relocation, and the paradigms of park and people management--A case study of Padampur villages and the Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Society &Natural Resources, 16(6), 509-526. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309146
Nepal, S. K. (2002). Involving indigenous peoples in protected area management: Comparative perspectives from Nepal, Thailand, and China. Environmental Management, 30, 0748-0763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2710-y
Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action: Cambridge university press.
Ostrom, E., & Cox, M. (2010). Moving beyond panaceas: a multi-tiered diagnostic approach for social-ecological analysis. Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 451-463. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892910000834
Pagdee, A., Kim, Y.-s., & Daugherty, P. J. (2006). What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources, 19(1), 33-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 08941920500323260
Pham, T. T., Wong, G., Le, D. N., & Brockhaus, M. (2016). The distribution of payment for forest environmental services (PFES) in Vietnam: Research evidence to inform payment guidelines: Center fo International Forestry Research (CIFOR). https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/006297
Salafsky, N., & Wollenberg, E. (2000). Linking livelihoods and conservation: a conceptual framework and scale for assessing the integration of human needs and biodiversity. World Development, 28(8), 1421-1438. https://doi.org/10. 1016/S0305-750X(00)00031-0
Sato, J., Chatty, D., & Colchester, M. (2002). Karen and the Land in Between: Public and Private Enclosure of Forests in Thailand. In D. Chatty & M. Colchester (Eds.), Conservation and Mobile Indigenous Peoples: Displacement, Forced Settlement and Sustainable Development (pp. 277–295). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1btbx2j.22
Schaik, C. v., & Rijksen, H. D. (2002). Integrated conservation and development projects: problems and potential. Terborgh, J., Schaik, C. von., Davenport, L., and Madhu, R. (Eds.), Making parks work: Strategies for preserving tropical nature (pp. 15-29). Island Press.
Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: a conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 249-262. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 3146375
Schmidt–Soltau, K. (2003). Conservation–related resettlement in Central Africa: environmental and social risks. Development and Change, 34(3), 525-551. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00317
Sinabutar, P., Nugroho, B., Kartodihardjo, H., & Darusman, D. (2014). Analysis of rules in use the formation of committee boundary (PTB) state forest area in Indonesia. Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, 3(4), 299-306.
Singh, V. S., Pandey, D. N., & Prakash, N. P. (2011). What determines the success of joint forest management? Science-based lessons on sustainable governance of forests in India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 56(1), 126-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.015
Stoll-Kleemann, S., & Welp, M. (2008). Participatory and integrated management of biosphere reserves: Lessons from case studies and a global survey. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 17(1), 161-168. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.17.S1.14
Sundberg, J. (1998). NGO landscapes in the Maya biosphere reserve, Guatemala. Geographical Review, 88(3), 388-412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1931-0846.1998.tb00114.x
Tallis, H., Kareiva, P., Marvier, M., & Chang, A. (2008). An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(28), 9457-9464. https://doi.org/ 10.1073/pnas.0705797105
Thai, T. H. (2012). Diversity of plant resources in the Xuan Nha Nature Reserve, Son La province. Academia Journal of Biology, 34(1), 88-93. https://doi.org/10.15625/ 0866-7160/v34n1.674
To, P. X., Dressler, W. H., Mahanty, S., Pham, T. T., & Zingerli, C. (2012). The prospects for payment for ecosystem services (PES) in Vietnam: a look at three payment schemes. Human Ecology, 40, 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-012-9480-9
Tole, L. (2010). Reforms from the ground up: a review of community-based forest management in tropical developing countries. Environmental management, 45(6), 1312-1331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9489-z
Usongo, L., & Nkanje, B. T. (2004). Participatory approaches towards forest conservation: the case of Lobéké National Park, south east Cameroon. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 11(2), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500409469816
Van Sang, N., Dang, N. X., & Truong, N. Q. (2010). Diversity of the herpotofauna of in Xuan Nha nature reserve, Son La province, northern Vietnam. Academia Journal of Biology, 32(4), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.15625/0866-7160/v32n4.721
Yusran, Y., Sahide, M. A. K., Supratman, S., Sabar, A., Krott, M., & Giessen, L. (2017). The empirical visibility of land use conflicts: From latent to manifest conflict through law enforcement in a national park in Indonesia. Land Use Policy, 62, 302-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.12.033
Znajda, S. K. (2014). What is ‘successful development’ in conservation and development projects? Insights from two Nicaraguan case studies. Conservation and society, 12(3), 318-328. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.145157
Copyright (c) 2024 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
