Conflict and Compromise, Discourse and Action: Political Ecology in the Complexity of Land Management in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v9i2.40301Keywords:
Political ecology, Ecological contestation, Conservation program, Food estate, Oil palm plantationsAbstract
Peatlands in Mantangai District, Central Kalimantan, have emerged as a site of contention among many stakeholders with differing interests, illustrating the intricacies of natural resource management in Indonesia. This research seeks to examine the contestation process, identify main actors, and comprehend how various forms of knowledge and power influence the results of peatland management. This research employs a case study method with a qualitative approach, incorporating direct observation, in-depth interviews, and document analysis to achieve a thorough knowledge of the dynamics of contestation. The findings indicate three primary viewpoints in peatland management: eco-conservationism exemplified by Mawas Borneo Orangutan Survival Foundation (BOSF), eco-developmentalism illustrated by the government's food estate initiative and oil palm plantation expansion, and eco-populism promoted by Wahana Lingkungan Hidup (WALHI) Central Kalimantan and local communities. This contention leads to multiple underlying conflicts, including tensions between conservation initiatives and resource extraction activities by local communities, discrepancies between governmental development programs and the ecological and social realities, as well as unresolved land disputes and compensation challenges arising from the expansion of oil palm plantations. This study suggests that a more holistic and inclusive approach to peatland management is necessary, taking into account ecological, economic, and socio-cultural factors in a balanced manner. These findings significantly enhance the comprehension of the intricacies of natural resource management and can underpin the formulation of more inclusive and sustainable policies moving forward.
References
Adams, W. M., & Hutton, J. (2007). People, Parks and Poverty: Political Ecology and Biodiversity Conservation. Conservation & Society, 5(2), 147–183. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26392879
Agrawal, A., & Gibson, C. C. (1999). Enchantment and Disenchantment: The Role of Community in Natural Resource Conservation. World Development, 27(4), 629–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(98)00161-2
Arsyad, M., Nuddin, A., Fahmid, I. M., Salman, D., Pulubuhu, D. A. T., Unde, A. A., Djufry, F., & Darwis. (2020). Agricultural development: poverty, conflict and strategic programs in country border. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 575(1), 012091. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/575/1/012091
Bebbington, A. J., Humphreys Bebbington, D., Sauls, L. A., Rogan, J., Agrawal, S., Gamboa, C., ... & Verdum, R. (2018). Resource extraction and infrastructure threaten forest cover and community rights. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(52), 13164-13173. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.18 1250511
Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred Ecology. Routledge.
Bryant, R. L. (2015). The international handbook of political ecology. Edward Elgar Publishing
Bryant, R. L., & Bailey, S. (1997). Third World Political Ecology. Routledge.
Callicott, B. J. (1997). Earth’s insights: A multicultural survey of ecological ethics from the Mediterranean basin to the Australian outback. University of California Press.
Carmenta, R., Zabala, A., Trihadmojo, B., Gaveau, D., Salim, M. A., & Phelps, J. (2021). Evaluating bundles of interventions to prevent peat-fires in Indonesia. Global Environmental Change, 67, 102154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.202 0.102154
Castree, N., & Braun, B. (2001). Social Nature: Theory, Practice, and Politics. Blackwell Publishers.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. SAGE Publications.
Dove, M. R. (2006). Indigenous People and Environmental Politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35(1), 191–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.0 81705.123235
Dove, M. R. (2011). The Banana Tree at the Gate: A History of Marginal Peoples and Global Markets in Borneo by Michael Dove. Yale University Press.
Ece, M., Murombedzi, J., & Ribot, J. (2017). Disempowering Democracy: Local Representation in Community and Carbon Forestry in Africa. Conservation and Society, 15(4), 357. https://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_16_103
Escobar, A. (1998). Whose Knowledge, Whose nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements. Journal of Political Ecology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.2458/v5i1.21397
Escobar, A. (2006). Political Ecology of Globality and Diference. Gestión y Ambiente, 9(3), 29–44.
Escobar, A. (2008). Territories of Difference: Place, Movements, Life, Redes. Duke University Press.
Fairhead, J., & Leach, M. (2003). Science, society and power: Environmental knowledge and policy in West Africa and the Caribbean. Cambridge University Press.
Ferguson, J. (1990). The Anti-Politics Machine “Development”, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge University Press.
Forsyth, T. (2003). Critical Political Ecology: The politics of environmental science. Routledge.
Gallemore, C., Di Gregorio, M., Moeliono, M., Brockhaus, M., & Prasti H., R. D. (2015). Transaction costs, power, and multi-level forest governance in Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 114, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.201 5.03.024
Goldman, M. J., Nadasdy, P., & Turner, M. D. (2011). Knowing Nature: Conversations at the Intersection of Political Ecology and Science Studies. University of Chicago Press.
Goldstein, J. E. (2016). Knowing the subterranean: Land grabbing, oil palm, and divergent expertise in Indonesia’s peat soil. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 48(4), 754–770. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X1559 9787
Guha, R., & Martinez-Alier, J. (2006). Varieties of environmentalism: Essays North and South. Earthscan.
Hall, D., Li, T., & Hirsch, P. (2011). Powers of Exclusion: Land Dilemmas in Southeast Asia. University of Hawaiʻi Press
Harrison, M. E., Ottay, J. B., D’Arcy, L. J., Cheyne, S. M., Anggodo, Belcher, C., ... & van Veen, F. F. (2020). Tropical forest and peatland conservation in Indonesia: Challenges and directions. People and Nature, 2(1), 4-28. https://doi.org/10.1 002/pan3.1006
Harvey, D. (2001). Spaces of Capital: Towards a Critical Geography. Routledge.
Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford University Press.
Homer-Dixon, T. F. (1999). Environment, scarcity, and violence. Princeton University Press.
Hoyt, A. M., Chaussard, E., Seppalainen, S. S., & Harvey, C. F. (2020a). Widespread subsidence and carbon emissions across Southeast Asian peatlands. Nature Geoscience, 13(6), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0575-4
Hoyt, A. M., Chaussard, E., Seppalainen, S. S., & Harvey, C. F. (2020b). Widespread subsidence and carbon emissions across Southeast Asian peatlands. Nature Geoscience, 13(6), 435–440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-020-0575-4
Igoe, J., Brockington, D., & Duffy, R. (2008). Nature Unbound: Conservation, Capitalism and the Future of Protected Areas. Earthscan.
Jax, K., Barton, D. N., Chan, K. M., De Groot, R., Doyle, U., Eser, U., ... & Wichmann, S. (2013). Ecosystem services and ethics. Ecological economics, 93, 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.06.008
Jewitt, S. L., Nasir, D., Page, S. E., Rieley, J. O., & Khanal, K. (2014). Indonesia’s contested domains. Deforestation, rehabilitation and conservation-with-development in Central Kalimantan’s tropical peatlands. International Forestry Review, 16(4), 405–420. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554814813484086
Kopnina, H., Washington, H., Taylor, B., & J Piccolo, J. (2018). Anthropocentrism: More than Just a Misunderstood Problem. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 31(1), 109–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1
Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of Natural Resource Governance Regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33(1), 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.environ.33.020607.095522
Leopold, A. (1945). A Sand County Almanac -- And Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press.
Li, T. M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Duke University Press.
Li, T. M. (2014). Land’s End: Capitalist Relations on an Indigenous Frontier. Duke University Press.
Lund, C. (2016). Rule and Rupture: State Formation through the Production of Property and Citizenship. Development and Change, 47(6), 1199–1228. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/dech.12274
Martin, A., McGuire, S., & Sullivan, S. (2013). Global environmental justice and biodiversity conservation. The Geographical Journal, 179(2), 122–131. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12018
Martinez-Alier, J. (2002). The environmentalism of the poor: A study of ecological conflicts and valuation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Marwanto, S., & Pangestu, F. (2021). Food Estate Program in Central Kalimantan Province as An Integrated and Sustainable Solution for Food Security in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 794(1), 012068. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/794/1/012068
McCarthy, J. F. (2006). The Fourth Circle: A Political Ecology of Sumatra’s Rainforest Frontier. Stanford University Press.
McCarthy, J. F., & Robinson, K. (2016). Land & Development in Indonesia: Searching for the People’s Sovereignty. ISEAS Publishing.
McMichael, P. (2012). The land grab and corporate food regime restructuring. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066 150.2012.661369
Murdiyarso, D., Lilleskov, E., & Kolka, R. (2019). Tropical peatlands under siege: the need for evidence-based policies and strategies. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 24(4), 493–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s1102 7-019-9844-1
Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long‐range ecology movement. A summary∗. Inquiry, 16(1–4), 95–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/002017473086 0168
Neumann, R. P. (2005). Making Political Ecology (A. B. Murphy, Ed.). Routledge.
Nightingale, A. (2015). A Feminist in the Forest: Situated Knowledgesand Mixing Methods in Natural ResourceManagement. ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 2(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14288/ac me.v2i1.709
Nygren, A., & Rikoon, S. (2008). Political Ecology Revisited: Integration of Politics and Ecology Does Matter. Society & Natural Resources, 21(9), 767–782. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920801961057
Page, S. E., Rieley, J. O., & Banks, C. J. (2011). Global and regional importance of the tropical peatland carbon pool. Global Change Biology, 17(2), 798–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02279.
Peet, R., Robbins, P., & Watts, M. J. (2011). Global Political Ecology. Routledge.
Peet, R., & Watts, M. (2004). Liberation Ecologies: Environment, Development and Social Movements (2nd edition). Routledge.
Peluso, N. L., & Lund, C. (2011). New frontiers of land control: Introduction. Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(4), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2011.60 7692
Peluso, N. L., & Vandergeest, P. (2001). Genealogies of the Political Forest and Customary Rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The Journal of Asian Studies, 60(3), 761–812. https://doi.org/10.2307/27001
Peluso, N. L., & Watts, M. (2001). Violent Environments. Cornell University Press.
Proctor, J. D. (1998). The social construction of nature: Relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 88(3), 352–376. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2564234
Purnomo, H., Shantiko, B., Sitorus, S., Gunawan, H., Achdiawan, R., Kartodihardjo, H., & Dewayani, A. A. (2017). Fire economy and actor network of forest and land fires in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 78, 21–31. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.forpol.2017.01.001
Rawlins, A., & Morris, J. (2010). Social and economic aspects of peatland management in Northern Europe, with particular reference to the English case. Geoderma, 154(3–4), 242–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2009.02.022
Reed, M. S., Bonn, A., Evans, C., Glenk, K., & Hansjürgens, B. (2014). Assessing and valuing peatland ecosystem services for sustainable management. Ecosystem Services, 9, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.04.007
Ribot, J. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2003). A Theory of Access. Rural Sociology, 68(2), 153–181. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.2003.tb00133.x
Robbins, P. (2011). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction, 2nd Edition. John Wiley & Sons.
Rodríguez‐Labajos, B., & Martínez‐Alier, J. (2015). Political ecology of water conflicts. WIREs Water, 2(5), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.109
Rolston, H. (1989). Philosophy Gone Wild: Environmental ethics. Prometheus Books.
Runtuboi, Y. Y., B. Permadi, D., Sahide, M. A. K., & Maryudi, A. (2020). Oil Palm Plantations, Forest Conservation and Indigenous Peoples in West Papua Province: What Lies Ahead? Forest and Society, 23–31. https://doi.org/10.2425 9/fs.v5i1.11343
Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
Sikor, T., & Lund, C. (2009). Access and Property: A Question of Power and Authority. Development and Change, 40(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660. 2009.01503.x
Soulé, M. E. (1985). What Is Conservation Biology? BioScience, 35(11), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.2307/1310054
Syam, J., Salman, D., Hasan, S., Ismartoyo, & Sirajuddin, S. N. (2019). Adaptive strategies of livestock waste processing technology to vulnerability availability of animal feed. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 235, 012094. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/235/1/012094
Taylor, P. W. (2011). Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics (25th Anniversary Edition).
Thorburn, C. C., & Kull, C. A. (2015). Peat swamp forest conservation withstands pervasive land conversion to oil palm plantation in North Selangor, Malaysia. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 56(1), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12045
Thornton, S. A., Dudin, Page, S. E., Upton, C., & Harrison, M. E. (2018). Peatland fish of Sebangau, Borneo: Diversity, monitoring and conservation. Mires and Peat, 22. https://doi.org/10.19189/MaP.2017.OMB.313
Tolinggi, W. K., Salman, D., Rahmadanih, & Iswoyo, H. (2023). Farmer regeneration and knowledge co-creation in the sustainability of coconut agribusiness in Gorontalo, Indonesia. Open Agriculture, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0162
Tsing, A. L. (2005). Friction: An Ethnography of Global Connection. Princeton University Press.
Tsing, A. L. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton University Press.
Uda, S. K., Hein, L., & Sumarga, E. (2017). Towards sustainable management of Indonesian tropical peatlands. Wetlands Ecology and Management, 25(6), 683–701. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-017-9544-0
Warren, M., Hergoualc’h, K., Kauffman, J. B., Murdiyarso, D., & Kolka, R. (2017). An appraisal of Indonesia’s immense peat carbon stock using national peatland maps: uncertainties and potential losses from conversion. Carbon Balance and Management, 12(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13021-017-0080-2
Watts, M. (2017). Political Ecology. In A Companion to Economic Geography (pp. 257–274). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405166430.ch16
Wittmer, H., & Birner, R. (2005). Between Conservationism, Eco-Populism and Developmentalism: Discourses in Biodiversity Policy in Thailand and Indonesia. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/505716
Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. The Guilford Press.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
