This is an outdated version published on 2019-04-25. Read the most recent version.

Examining forest economies: A case study of silk value chain analysis in Wajo District

Authors

  • Andi Gunawan Pratama Hasanuddin University
  • Supratman Supratman Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin
  • Makkarennu Makkarennu Forestry Faculty, Universitas Hasanuddin

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.4912

Keywords:

silk, value chain, marketing margin, profit margin, Sulawesi, Indonesia, Social Forestry, livelihoods

Abstract

Value chain analysis is a strategic analytical tool for understanding activities that represent the value of a product (or service), meanwhile providing opportunities for identifying competitive advantage. In this value chain analysis, the research aims to 1) map the actors of silk commodity business ventures, 2) determine the activities of these business actors, and 3) calculate and analyze financial ratios. This study was conducted in the Wajo District as a site historically well known for silk production, and which is undergoing efforts at revival. The method used in this study is observation, interview, and modeling. Data analysis was conducted as a classical value chain analysis, emphasizing the calculations of financial ratios. The results show that the main actors and activities in commodities trading are farmers, local traders, weavers, and silk clothing stores. The largest marketing margin is approximately IDR. 300,000, which is found in silk clothing stores. On the other hand, the smallest marketing margins amounted to about IDR. 100,000, which were identified among local traders. Finally, the largest profit margins were identified among farmers valued at IDR. 196,000, while the smallest profit margins were among local traders amounting to IDR. 68,000. Overall, this case study highlights that forest enterprises, in this case of the silk industry in Wajo, can improve household incomes for forest farmers, while maintaining their overall bargaining position against the market.

Author Biographies

References

ACIAR. (2012). Membuat Rantai Nilai Lebih Berpihak Pada Kaum Miskin. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (hal. 100). Australian: Australian Goverment.

Hafid, I. (2016). The Effect of Margin Profit and Total Assets Towards Sustainable Growth Rate of the Distributor and trade Company. International Journal of Business Management 10 (4): 423-428.

Harbi, J., Nurrochmat, D. R., & Kusharto, C. M. (2015). Analisis Kelayakan Usaha Persuteraan Alam, Diversifikasi dan Inovasi Produk di Kabupaten Wajo, Sulawesi Selatan. Bogor: Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Hakim I., Setiasih, I., Murniatih, Asmanah W., Rachman E., dan Sri R. (2010). Social Forestry. Menuju Restorai Pembangunan Kehutanan Berkelanjutan. Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Perubahan Iklim dan Kebijakan.

Nuraeni, S. (2017). Gaps in the thread: Disease, production, and opportunity in the failing silk industry of South Sulawesi. Forest and Society, 1(2), 110-120. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.1861

Popoko, S. (2013). Pengaruh Biaya Pemasaran Terhadap Tingkat Pendapatan Petani Kopra di Kecamatan Tobelo Selatan Kabupaten Halmahera Utara. Jurnal UNIERA, 2.

Porter, M. E. (1983). Competitive Advantage. New York: Free Press

SIFSIA. (2011). Price and Market-Structure Analysis for Some Agricultural Commodities: Marketing Costs and Margins. Agricultural Economics Directorate of the Ministry of Agriculture, Sudan. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/sifsia/docs/Marketing%20Cost%20Margin%20Final%20May%202011%20(2).pdf

Sihar, N. F. (2008). Kriya Tekstil Tenunan Sutera Tradisional Gedongan Sulawesi Selatan, Studi Kasus: Kabupaten Wajo, Sulawesi Selatan. Bandung: Institut Teknologi Bandung.

Widarsono, A. (2005). Analisis Stratejik Rantai Nilai: Suatu Pendekatan Manajemen Biaya. Bandung: BHMN

Published

2019-04-25

Versions

Issue

Section

Special Section: The economies, ecologies and politics of social forestry in Indonesia

How to Cite

Examining forest economies: A case study of silk value chain analysis in Wajo District. (2019). Forest and Society, 3(1), 22-33. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v3i1.4912

Similar Articles

1-10 of 216

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)