Analysis of Monitoring and Evaluation System Development of Smoke-Free Area in Indonesia

Arief Hargono (1) , Santi Martini (2) , Kurnia Dwi Artanti (3) , Muhammad Aziz Rahman (4) , Rizma Dwi Nastiti (5)
(1) Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(2) Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(3) Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(4) Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC 3806, Australia & Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia , Australia,
(5) Research Group Tobacco Control, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia , Indonesia

Abstract

The World Health Organization Bulletin data show that Indonesia's compliance score for non-smokers' protection efforts was 0.1 in 2016. This research aims to analyze the need for data, information, and indicators to support the implementation, monitoring and evaluation of Smoke Free Area (SFA) in Indonesia through system analysis. This is an operational research study using the Focus Group Discussion (FGD) and document methods. The research series at early stage in the development of an evaluation and monitoring system, utilizing a system develop-ment cycle approach. Data is collected by the SFA task force and the community based on system components. The results of this study show that the entity responsible for conducting the monitoring and evaluation of SFA is the Task Force and community. The new potential data and information that has not been existed in the previous system are community as the potential data source of monitoring SFA, strategic data for SFA including the existence of self-service machines for selling cigarettes, and socialization of SFA regulation, monitoring and evaluation as a strategic activity to improve the result of SFA regulation, institution status of SFA and changes in smoking behavior. The information generated by the monitoring and evaluation system includes the SFA status of the institutions which is used for decision making to support the SFA program and the tobacco control program. Continuous monitoring and evaluation are important to ensure policy effectiveness, identify components for improvement or expansion of policies, and increase stakeholder and public support to strengthen or develop SFA policies.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

1. The Tobacco Atlas. State of Global Tobacco. 2023. https://tobaccoatlas.org/

2. WHO. WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Use 2000-2025 Fourth Edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/348537/9789240039322-eng.pdf?sequence=1

3. WHO. Pernyataan: Hari Tanpa Tebakau Sedunia 2020. World Health Organization; 2020. https://www.who.int/indonesia/news/detail/30-05-2020-pernyataan-hari-tanpa-tembakau-sedunia-2020

4. Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia. Indonesian Health Survey 2023. Jakarta: Ministry of Health; 2024. https://www.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/hasil-ski-2023/5

5. National Institute of Health Research and Development Ministry of Health of the Republic Indonesia. National Report on Basic Health Research 2018. Jakarta: 2019; Ministry of Health of the Republic of Indonesia; 2019. https://repository.badankebijakan.kemkes.go.id/id/eprint/3514/1/Laporan%20Riskesdas%202018%20Nasional.pdf

6. Abubakar H. Tobacco Use is the Leading Preventable Cause of Death Worldwide. Annals of Biological Sciences. 2022;10(4):1–2. https://www.imedpub.com/articles/tobacco-use-is-the-leading-preventable-cause-of-death-worldwide.pdf

7. Flor LS, Reitsma MB, Gupta V, Ng M, Gakidou E. The Effects of Tobacco Control Policies on Global Smoking Prevalence. Nature Medicine. 2021;27(2):239–243. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01210-8

8. Septiono W, Kuipers MAG, Ng N, Kunst AE. Progress of Smoke-Free Policy Adoption at District Level in Indonesia: A Policy Diffusion Study. International Journal of Drug Policy. 2019;71:93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2019.06.015

9. Martini S, Artanti KD, Hargono A, Widati S, Ahsan A. Association Between Percentage of Smokers and Prevalence of Smoking Attributable Morbidity in Indonesia: One Decade After Implementation of Smoke Free Area Regulation. BMC Public Health. 2022;1–8.

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-14435-8

10. Septiono W, Kuipers MAG, Ng N, Kunst AE. The Impact of Local Smoke-Free Policies on Smoking Behaviour Among Adults in Indonesia: A Quasi-Experimental National Study. Addiction. 2020;115(12):2382-2392. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15110

11. Fahmi MA. Correlation Between Smoke-Free Areas and Smoking Behaviour in Indonesia. Jurnal Berkala Epidemiologi. 2020;8(2):117-124. https://doi.org/10.20473/jbe.V8I22020.117-124

12. Tuangratananon T, Wangmo S, Widanapathirana N, Pongutta S, Viriyathorn S, Patcharanarumol W, et al. Implementation of National Action Plans on Noncommunicable Diseases, Bhutan, Cambodia, Indonesia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Vietnam. Bulletin of World Health Organization. 2018;97(2):129–141. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.18.220483

13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Introduction to Process Evaluation in Tobacco Use Prevention and Control. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health; 2008. https://stacks.cdc.gov/view/cdc/177224

14. Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok. Surabaya; 2019. https://jdih.surabaya.go.id/uploads/peraturan/3540_perda_02-2019.pdf

15. Pemerintah Kabupaten Klungkung. Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Klungkung Nomor 7 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok. Semarapura, Klungkung; 2014. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/24491/perda-kab-klungkung-no-1-tahun-2014

16. Pemerintah Kota Depok. Peraturan Daerah Kota Depok Nomor 3 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok. Depok; 2014. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/162852/perda-kota-depok-no-3-tahun-2014

17. Pemerintah Kota Depok. Peraturan Daerah Kota Depok Nomor 2 Tahun 2020 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Daerah Nomor 3 Tahun 2014 Tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok. Depok; 2020. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/135175/perda-kota-depok-no-2-tahun-2020

18. Pemerintah Kota Surabaya. Peraturan Walikota Surabaya Nomor 110 Tahun 2021 Tentang Pedoman Pelaksanaan Peraturan Daerah Kota Surabaya Nomor 2 Tahun 2019 Tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok. Surabaya; 2021. https://jdih.surabaya.go.id/peraturan/4006

19. Pemerintah Kota Bogor. Peraturan Daerah Kota Bogor Nomor 10 Tahun 2018 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Daerah Nomor 12 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kawasan Tanpa Rokok. Bogor; 2018. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/172046/perda-kota-bogor-no-10-tahun-2018

20. Zablocki RW, Edland SD, Myers MG, Strong DR, Hofstetter CR, Al-Delaimy WK. Smoking Ban Policies and Their Influence on Smoking Behaviours Among Current California Smokers: A Population-Based Study. Preventive Medicine. 2014;59:73–78. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743513004520

21. Bafunno D, Catino A, Lamorgese V, Bene G Del, Longo V, Pesola F, et al. Impact of Tobacco Control Interventions on Smoking Initiation, Cessation, and Prevalence: A Systematic Review. Journal of Thoracic Disease. 2020;12(7):3844–3856. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7399441/

22. García-Altés A, Pinilla J, Marí-Dell’Olmo M, Fernández E, López MJ. Economic Impact of Smoke-Free Legislation: Did the Spanish

Tobacco Control Law Affect the Economic Activity of Bars and Restaurants?. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 2015;17(11):1397–1400. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu346

23. WHO FCTC. WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. Geneva: WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control; 2003. https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/42811/9241591013.pdf?sequence=1

24. Presiden Republik Indonesia. Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan. Kemen-terian Hukum dan HAM Republik Indonesia; 2009. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/38778/uu-no-36-tahun-2009

25. Empower Enabling Change. Tobacco Free Fingal - A Toolkit for a Tobacco-Free Community. 2019. https://www.empower.ie/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/Empower_Tobacco_ToolkitFEB25-1.pdf

26. TCSC IAKMI. Fakta Tembakau dan Permasalahannya di Indonesia. Jakarta: Tobacco Control Support Center – Ikatan Ahli Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, Kemenkes RI; 2014. https://www.tcsc-indonesia.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Buku-Fakta-Tembakau-2014__Web-Version.pdf

27. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Smoking & Tobacco Use: Smokefree Policies Improve Health. CDC; 2019. https://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/secondhand_smoke/protection/reduce_smoking/index.htm#print

28. Levy DT, Tam J, Kuo C, Fong GT, Chaloupka F. The Impact of Implementing Tobacco Control Policies: The 2017 Tobacco Control Policy Scorecard. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2018;24(5):448–457. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000780

29. Levy DT, Huang A tsun, Havumaki JS, Arbor A, Meza R, Arbor A. The Role of Public Policies in Reducing Smoking Prevalence: Results from the Michigan SimSmoke Tobacco Policy Simulation Model. Cancer Causes Control. 2016;27(5):615–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-016-0735-4

30. Sharbaugh MS, Id ADA, Thoma FW, Lee JS, Figueredo M, Mulukutla SR. Impact of Cigarette Taxes on Smoking Prevalence from 2001-2015: A Report Using the Behavioural and Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS). Plos One. 2018;1–10. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204416

31. Leung R, Mallya G, Dean LT, Rizvi A, Dignam L, Schwarz DF. Instituting A Smoke-Free Policy for City Recreation Centers and Playgrounds, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 2010. Preventing Chronic Disease. 2013;10 (7):1–10. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd10.120294

32. Majed A, Hiddi S, Dossari N, Melaifi W, Khattab T, Najjar I, et al. A Comparative Study on the Effect of Designated Indoor Smoking Areas on the Behaviour and Attitude of Adults Attending Coffee Shops in Bahrain Toward Smoking. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health. 2020;9 (2):156-162. https://www.bibliomed.org/mnsfulltext/67/67-1566231901.pdf?1752654844

33. Vardavas CI, Agaku I, Patelarou E, Anagnostopoulos N, Nakou C, Dramba V, et al. Ashtrays and Signage as Determinants of a Smoke-Free Legislation’s Success. PLoS One. 2013;8(9):e72945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072945

34. Suarjana K, Astuti PAS, Artawan Eka Putra IWG, et al. Implementation of Smoke-Free Law in Denpasar Bali: Between Compliance and Social Norms of Smoking. Journal of Public Health Research. 2020;9(3):246-254. https://doi.org/10.4081/jphr.2020.1747

35. Wynne O, Guillaumier A, Twyman L, Id SM, Denham AMJ, Paul C, et al. Signs, Fines and Compliance Officers: A Systematic Review of Strategies for Enforcing Smoke-Free Policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2018;15(7):1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071386

36. Platter HN, Pokorny SB. Smoke-Free Signage in Public Parks: Impacts on Smoking Behaviour. Tobacco Control. 2017;27(4):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2016-053624

37. Record RA, Helme D, Savage MW, Harrington NG. Let’s Clear the Air: A Campaign That Effectively Increased Compliance with A University’s Tobacco-Free Policy. Journal of Applied Communication Research. 2017;45(1):79–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2016.1248471

38. Menzies D, Nair A, Williamson PA, Schembri S, Al-Khairalla MZH, Barnes M, et al. Respiratory Symptoms, Pulmonary Function, and Markers of Inflammation Among Bar Workers Before and After A Legislative Ban on Smoking in Public Places. JAMA. 2006;296(14):1742–1748. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.14.1742

39. Callinan JE, Clarke A, Doherty K, Kelleher C. Legislative Smoking Bans for Reducing Secondhand Smoke Exposure, Smoking Prevalence and Tobacco Consumption. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010;(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005992.pub2

40. Mackay D, Haw S, Ayres JG, Fischbacher C, Pell JP. Smoke-Free Legislation and Hospitalizations for Childhood Asthma. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2010;363(12):1139–1145. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1002861

41. IARC. Tobacco Control, Vol. 13: Evaluating the Effectiveness of Smoke-Free Policies. Lyon, France: IARC Handbooks of Cancer Prevention Tobacco Control; 2009. https://www.iarc.who.int/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/handbook13.pdf

42. Semple S, Dobson R, O’Donnell R, Zainal Abidin E, Tigova O, Okello G, et al. Smoke-Free Spaces: A Decade of Progress, A Need for More?. Tobacco Control. 2022;31(2): 250–256. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056556

43. WHO. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2017: Monitoring Tobacco Use and Prevention Policies. World Health Organization; 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512824

Authors

Arief Hargono
arief.hargono@fkm.unair.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Santi Martini
Kurnia Dwi Artanti
Muhammad Aziz Rahman
Rizma Dwi Nastiti
Author Biographies

Arief Hargono, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Santi Martini, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Kurnia Dwi Artanti, Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Muhammad Aziz Rahman, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC 3806, Australia & Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Institute of Health and Wellbeing, Federation University Australia, Berwick, VIC 3806, Australia & Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, Population Studies and Health Promotion, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Rizma Dwi Nastiti, Research Group Tobacco Control, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia

Research Group Tobacco Control, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia 

Hargono, A., Martini, S., Artanti, K. D., Rahman, M. A., & Nastiti, R. D. (2025). Analysis of Monitoring and Evaluation System Development of Smoke-Free Area in Indonesia. Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, 21(1), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.30597/mkmi.v21i1.35112

Article Details

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.