Specific vs Unspecific Smoke-Free Regulation: Which One is More Effective?

Hesti Retno Budi Arini (1), Rumayya Rumayya (2), Muhammad Syaikh Rohman (3), Nur Annisa Fauziyah (4), Oktavian Denta Eko Antoro (5)
(1) Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia, Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia, and The Habibie Center, Jakarta, Indonesia, Australia,
(2) Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia and Economic Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(3) Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia and Economic Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(4) Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia and The Habibie Center, Jakarta, Indonesia, Indonesia,
(5) Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract

Tobacco kills up to half of its users, and smoking prevalence and tobacco exposure among Indonesian youth are increasing. A comprehensive ban on Tobacco Advertising, Promotion, and Sponsorship (TAPS) is a recommended tobacco control measure. Thus, this study aimed to analyze and compare political economy factors that contribute to the effectiveness of the TAPS ban implementation in Surabaya and Kulon Progo.  In-depth interviews and a focus group discussion were conducted, recorded, transcribed, then analyzed using thematic analysis. We find that the role of local government was pivotal in creating and implementing regulations for tobacco control, while the leaders’ will and capability were also essential. However, the COVID-19 pandemic had limited all tobacco control measures in both studied districts. Furthermore, the lack of political will and low support from the political parties are the several factors hindering tobacco control measures at the district level, including TAPS ban enforcement. We also find that there is a need to strengthen the understanding of local government, society, and other related stakeholders toward the urgency of the TAPS ban. Further studies calculating the impact of the total TAPS ban on local revenue and the potential benefit of a total TAPS ban are urgently needed for advocating total TAPS ban implementation in a broader scope of the country.

Full text article

Generated from XML file

References

Flor LS, Reitsma MB, Gupta V, Ng M, Gakidou E. The Effects of Tobacco Control Policies on Global Smoking Prevalence. Nature Medicine. 2021;27(2):239–243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-01210-8

Health Data. Global Burden of Disease 2019. 2019. https://www.healthdata.org/gbd/2019

WHO. Tobacco. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco

Indonesian Ministry of Health. Indonesia Basic Health Research. Jakarta: Agency of Health Research and Development Indonesian Ministry of Health; 2018.

Freeman B, Watts C, Astuti PAS. Global Tobacco Advertising, Promotion and Sponsorship Regulation: What’s Old, What’s New and Where to Next? Tobacco Control. 2022;31(2):216–221. https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/tobaccocontrol/31/2/216.full.pdf

Amsal A, Ramadhan K, Nurfatimah N, Ramadhan A, Aminuddin A, Hafid F. Counseling Effect on Smoking Cessation Behavior in Junior High School Students. Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia. 2021;17(1):9–16. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/mkmi/article/view/13018/7295

WHO. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2021. Addressing New and Emerging Products. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021. https://www.who.int/teams/health-promotion/tobacco-control/global-tobacco-report-2021

Tselengidis A, Dance S, Adams S, Freeman B, Cranwell J. Tobacco Advertising, Promotion, and Sponsorship Ban Adoption: A Pilot Study of the Reporting Challenges Faced by Low- and Middle - Income Countries. Tobacco Induced Disease. 2023;21:1–14. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/155816

Bardach A, Alcaraz A, Roberti J, Ciapponi A, Augustovski F, Pichon-Riviere A. Optimizing Tobacco Advertising Bans in Seven Latin American Countries: Microsimulation Modeling of Health and Financial Impact to Inform Evidence-Based Policy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2021;18(10):1–13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8151006/pdf/ijerph-18-05078.pdf

Megatsari H, Ridlo IA, Amir V, Kusuma D. Visibility and Hotspots of Outdoor Tobacco Advertisement Around Educational Facilities Without an Advertising Ban: Geospatial Analysis in Surabaya City, Indonesia. Tobacco Prevention and Cessation. 2019;5(October):1–6. https://doi.org/10.18332/tpc/112462

Dewanti M, Purnomo E, Kasiwi A. Upaya Pemerintah Kulon Progo dalam Pengendalian Tembakau. Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan. 2020;5(1):45–59. https://ojs.umrah.ac.id/index.php/kemudi/article/view/2243

Campos PA, Reich MR. Political Analysis for Health Policy Implementation. Health Systems & Reform. 2019;5(3):224–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/23288604.2019.1625251

Byrne D. A Worked Example of Braun and Clarke’s Approach to Reflexive Thematic Analysis. Quality & Quantity. 2022;56(3):1391–1412. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-021-01182-y

Sebayang SK, Dewi DMSK, Lailiyah S, Ahsan A. Mixed-Methods Evaluation of a Ban on Tobacco Advertising and Promotion in Banyuwangi District, Indonesia. Tobacco Control. 2019;28(6):651–656. https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/28/6/651

Astuti PAS, Assunta M, Freeman B. Why is Tobacco Control Progress in Indonesia Stalled? A Qualitative Analysis of Interviews with Tobacco Control Experts. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–12. https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12889-020-08640-6

Stubbs T. Commercial Determinants of Youth Smoking in ASEAN Countries: A Narrative Review of Research Investigating the Influence of Tobacco Advertising, Promotion, and Sponsorship. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 2021;19(July):1–13. https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/139124

Fauzi R, Handari SRT. Analysis of Factors Related to the Use of Non-Smoking Tobacco Products in Junior High School Students in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Public Health. 2019;15(2):135–142. https://journal.unhas.ac.id/index.php/mkmi/article/view/5560/pdf

Astuti PAS, Freeman B. “It is Merely a Paper Tiger.” Battle for Increased Tobacco Advertising Regulation in Indonesia: Content Analysis of News Articles. BMJ Open. 2017;7(9):1-9. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/9/e016975

Septiono W, Kuipers MAG, Ng N, Kunst AE. Self-Reported Exposure of Indonesian Adolescents to Online and Offline Tobacco Advertising, Promotion and Sponsorship (TAPS). Tobacco Control. 2022;31:98–105. https://tobaccocontrol.bmj.com/content/tobaccocontrol/31/1/98.full.pdf

Authors

Hesti Retno Budi Arini
Rumayya Rumayya
rumayya@feb.unair.ac.id (Primary Contact)
Muhammad Syaikh Rohman
Nur Annisa Fauziyah
Oktavian Denta Eko Antoro
Author Biographies

Hesti Retno Budi Arini, Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia, Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia, and The Habibie Center, Jakarta, Indonesia

Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences,
Deakin University, Burwood, Victoria, Australia

Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia

The Habibie Center, Jakarta, Indonesia

Rumayya Rumayya, Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia and Economic Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia

Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia

Economic Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia

Muhammad Syaikh Rohman, Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia and Economic Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia

Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia

Economic Department, Faculty of Economics and Business, Airlangga University, Indonesia

Nur Annisa Fauziyah, Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia and The Habibie Center, Jakarta, Indonesia

Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia

The Habibie Center, Jakarta, Indonesia

Oktavian Denta Eko Antoro, Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia

Research Institute of Socio-Economics Development (RISED), Surabaya, Indonesia

Arini, H. R. B. ., Rumayya, R., Rohman, M. S. ., Fauziyah, N. A., & Antoro, O. D. E. . (2023). Specific vs Unspecific Smoke-Free Regulation: Which One is More Effective?. Media Kesehatan Masyarakat Indonesia, 19(2), 73–84. https://doi.org/10.30597/mkmi.v19i2.25549

Article Details

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.