Peer Review Process
Submitted articles will be selected and reviewed by editorial boards. The submission should be in soft copy format in Ms. Word file format, single-spaced, with letter size paper. The length of the article should not exceed 8000 words. Please also attach the abstract with a maximum of 250 words length in English and five keywords. The author should write their institution postal address and also the phone contact in the first part of the article.
The article should meet the following structures: introduction, Method, Result and Discussion, Conclusion, and reference. All references in the articles should be neatly put in a proper format. Footnotes should be written on the bottom part of every page, do not put them at the end of the article. The bibliography should follow the APA (American Psychological Association) Style.
ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia will publish the only paper strictly following ETNOSIA guidelines and manuscript preparation. All submitted manuscripts are going through a single-blind peer-review process. Those papers are read by editorial members (upon the field of specialization) and will be screened by Managing Editor to meet the necessary criteria of ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia publication. Manuscripts will be sent to two reviewers minimum based on their historical experience in reviewing manuscript or based on their field of specialization. ETNOSIA: Jurnal Etnografi Indonesia has reviewing forms in order to keep the same items reviewed by two reviewers minimum. Then the editorial board will make a decision upon the reviewer's comments or advice. Reviewers will give their assessment on originality, clarity of presentation, contribution to the field/science, ETNOSIA has four kinds of decisions:
- Accepted, as it is
- Accepted by Minor Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
- Accepted by Major Revisions (let authors revised with stipulated time)
- Rejected (generally, on grounds of the outside of scope and aim, major technical description problems, lack of clarity of presentation)