Global biodiversity-related conventions on facilitating biodiversity conservation in Vietnam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i2.14473Keywords:
Aichi Target, Biodiversity convention, Protected areas, Special-use forests, Viet NamAbstract
Global biodiversity-related conventions have positively influenced nature conservation in Vietnam. Adherence to international policies and strategies is one of the critical motivations for reducing biodiversity loss. As highlighted in Aichi Target 11, protected areas are central for this effort and Vietnam is not an exception. In this study we reflect on and suggest how this Target can be most effectively pursued in Vietnam. Of which, besides remaining the status of special-use forests, uplifting protection forests, especially focusing on forest areas which are in rich biodiversity condition, to special-use forests category should be a priority.
References
Büscher, B., Fletcher, R., Brockington, D., Sandbrook, C., Adams, W. M., Campbell, L., . . . Shanker, K. (2017). Half-Earth or Whole Earth? Radical ideas for conservation, and their implications. Oryx, 51(3), 407-410. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605316001228
Butchart, S. H. M., Walpole, M., Collen, B., van Strien, A., Scharlemann, J. P. W., Almond, R. E. A., . . . Watson, R. (2010). Global Biodiversity: Indicators of Recent Declines. Science, 328(5982), 1164. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1187512
CBD. (2004). Protected Areas. CoP 7 Decision VII/28. Convention on Biological Diversity, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Retrieved from
COP 10. (2010). Decision adopted by the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity at its Tenth Meeting X/2. The Strategic Plan for Biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Paper presented at the Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties. Retrieved from https://www.cbd.int/decision/cop/?id=12268
Vietnam Forestry Administration. (2020). National assessment report on special-use and protection forest management in 2020 and preparation for 2021. Vietnam Forestry Administration.
Dudley, N., Shadie, P., & Stolton, S. (2013). Guidelines for Applying Protected Area Management Categories including Best Practice Guidance on Recognising Protected Areas and Assigning Management Categories and Governance Types (Vol. 21). IUCN.
GIZ. (2020). Báo cáo rà soát, đánh giá và đề xuất chính sách đầu từ phát triển rừng đặc đụng và phòng hộ ở Việt Nam. (Assessing and proposing investment and development policy for special-use and protection forest in Vietnam). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ)
Hoekstra, J. M., Boucher, T. M., Ricketts, T. H., & Roberts, C. (2005). Confronting a biome crisis: Global disparities of habitat loss and protection. Ecology Letters, 8(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2004.00686.x
IUCN. (1999). The Vietnam Biodiversity Action Plan: Three-Year Review Workshop - A Summary Report. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
IUCN. (2003). The Durban Action Plan, Vth IUCN World Parks Congress, Durban, South Africa 8-17 September 2003. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)
Khuc, Q. V., Tran, B. Q., Meyfroidt, P., & Paschke, M. W. (2018). Drivers of deforestation and forest degradation in Vietnam: An exploratory analysis at the national level. Forest Policy and Economics, 90, 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.02.004
Kok, M. T. J., Tyler, S., Prins, A. G., Pintér, L., Baumüller, H., Bernstein, J., . . . Grosshans, R. (2010). Prospects for mainstreaming ecosystem goods and services in international policies. Biodiversity, 11(1-2), 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2010.9712647
Locke, H. (2013). Nature needs half: A necessary and hopeful new agenda for protected areas. PARKS, 19(2), 13-22. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2013.PARKS-19-2.
Lopoukhine, N., & Dias, B. (2012). Editorial: What does target 11 really mean? PARKS, 18(1), 5-8.
MONRE. (2010). Chiến lược quốc gia về đa dạng sinh học đến năm 2020, tầm nhìn đến năm 2030. Ministry of Natural Resources And Environment.
MONRE. (2011). Vietnam’s National Biodiversity Report. Ministry of Natural Resources And Environment.
MONRE. (2019). The sixth National Report to the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity. Ministry of Natural Resources And Environment.
NGO concerns over the proposed 30% target for protected areas and absence of safeguards for Indigenous Peoples and local communities (In a letter to the CBD Secretariat) (2020).
NGOs and experts. (2020). NGO concerns over the proposed 30% target for protected areas and absence of safeguards for Indigenous Peoples and local communities. In Letter to the CBD Secretariat.
Phạm TT., Hoàng TL., Đào TLC., & Nguyễn ĐT. (2020). Tổng quan hệ thống chính sách và hướng dẫn phân loại rừng quốc tế. CIFOR.
Schleicher, J., Zaehringer, J. G., Fastré, C., Vira, B., Visconti, P., & Sandbrook, C. (2019). Protecting half of the planet could directly affect over one billion people. Nature Sustainability, 2(12), 1094-1096. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-019-0423-y
Sterling, E. J., & Hurley, M. M. (2008). Vietnam: a natural history. Yale University Press.
UNBiodiversity Lab. (2018). Key Biodiversity Area Protection, Vietnam. Retrieved from http://www.nbsapforum.net/sites/default/files/KeyBiodiversityAreaProtection_VNM.png.
UNEP-WCMC, IUCN, & NGS. (2018). Protected Planet Report 2018. UNEP-WCMC, IUCN and NGS
WDPA. (2018). Terrestrial protected areas (% of total land area) - Country Ranking. Retrieved from https://www.indexmundi.com/facts/indicators/ER.LND.PTLD.ZS/rankings
WDPA. (2020). Protected Areas. Retrieved from https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/thematic-areas/wdpa?tab=WDPA.
Whitehorn, P. R., Navarro, L. M., Schroter, M., Fernandez, M., Rotllan-Puig, X., & Marques, A. (2019). Mainstreaming biodiversity: A review of national strategies. Biol Conserv, 235, 157-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.04.016
Wilson, E. O. (2016). Half-Earth. WW Norton & Company.
Woodley, S., Bertzky, B., Crawhall, N., Dudley, N., Londoño, J. M., MacKinnon, K., ... & Sandwith, T. (2012). Meeting Aichi Target 11: what does success look like for protected area systems. PARKS, 18(1), 23-36.
World Conservation Monitoring Centre. (1992). Development of a National Biodiversity Index.
Zafra-Calvo, N., Pascual, U., Brockington, D., Coolsaet, B., Cortes-Vazquez, J. A., Gross-Camp, N., . . . Burgess, N. D. (2017). Towards an indicator system to assess equitable management in protected areas. Biological Conservation, 211, 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.05.014
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
