Will Indigenous Ecological Knowledge Vanish? Assessing Persistence of the Celako kemali in Farming Practices among the Serawainese in Bengkulu, Indonesia
Additional Files
Deprecated: json_decode(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($json) of type string is deprecated in /home/journal33/public_html/plugins/generic/citations/CitationsPlugin.inc.php on line 49
Indonesia is home to many indigenous peoples who can preserve the environment through their traditions amid the increasing of external values and lifestyles’ penetration. The following presents the indigenous ecological knowledge of the Serawai people in the form of the celako kemali. Based on insights from the Indigenous research methods, this study aims first to assess the persistence of the celako kemali as a method for farming practices. Second, to identify transmission patterns of the celako kemali among generations in the Serawai community. This study found that there were 19 types of celako kemali. The current analysis demonstrates that, out of the 19 celako kemali, three types have been completely abandoned, five are still in use but with minor modifications, and eleven are still valid by established standards. The first generation acquires knowledge from their parents through the internalization process within the family. This first generation still preserves and maintains the 19 celako kemali daily farming activities. The second generation acquires knowledge through internalization within the family and horizontally by sharing experiences with other farmers, but horizontal channels are more dominant. This generation knows the 19 types of the celako kemali, although they dare to modify five types without losing the essence of their body of knowledge. The third generation acquires knowledge through vertical and oblique transmission, in which the oblique channel is predominant. This third generation learns a lot from village elders unrelated to the family, teachers, and mass media. However, this generation has abandoned completely three types of the celako kemali.
Alcantara, C., Lalonde, D., & Wilson, G. N. (2017). Indigenous research and academic freedom: A view from political scientists. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.3
Aswani, S., Lemahieu, A., & Sauer, W. H. H. (2018). Global trends of local ecological knowledge and future implications. PLoS ONE, 13(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0195440
Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of Traditional Ecological Knowledge as Adaptive Management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
Berkes, F., & Folke, C. (2010). Indigenous Knowledge for biodiversity Conservation. Policy, 22(2), 151–156. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4314060
Cardinale, B. J., Duffy, J. E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D. U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., Narwani, A., MacE, G. M., Tilman, D., Wardle, D. A., Kinzig, A. P., Daily, G. C., Loreau, M., Grace, J. B., Larigauderie, A., Srivastava, D. S., & Naeem, S. (2012). Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature, 486(7401), 59–67. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nature11148
Carson, S. L., Kentatchime, F., Nana, E. D., Njabo, K. Y., Cole, B. L., & Godwin, H. A. (2018). Indigenous Peoples’ concerns about loss of forest knowledge: Implications for forest management. Conservation & Society, 16(4), 431–440. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26500657
Castleden, H. E., Martin, D., Cunsolo, A., Harper, S., & Hart, C. (2017). Implementing indigenous and western knowledge systems (Part 2): “You have to take a backseat” and abandon the arrogance of expertise. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.4.8
Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., & Fieldman, M. . (1981). Cultural transmission and Evaolution: A Quantitative Approach. Princeton University Press.
Cook, G., & Offit, T. (2008). Pluralism and transculturation in indigenous Maya religion. Ethnology, 47(1), 45–59.
Cox, P. A. (2000). Will tribal knowledge survive the millennium? Science, 287(5450), 44–45. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.287.5450.44
Drawson, A. S., Toombs, E., & Mushquash, C. J. (2017). Indigenous research methods: A systematic review. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 8(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18584/iipj.2017.8.2.5
Ens, E. J., Pert, P., Clarke, P. A., Budden, M., Clubb, L., Doran, B., & Wason, S. (2015). Indigenous biocultural knowledge in ecosystem science and management: Review and insight from Australia. Biology Conservation, 15(181), 133–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.008
Gallois, S., Lubbers, M. J., Hewlett, B., & Reyes-García, V. (2018). Social Networks and Knowledge Transmission Strategies among Baka Children, Southeastern Cameroon. Human Nature, 29(4), 442–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110- 018- 9328-0
Gidden, A. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press.
Gidden, Anthony. (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. University of California Press.
Gómez-Baggethun, E. (2021). Is there a future for indigenous and local knowledge? Journal of Peasant Studies, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150. 2021.1926994
Gómez-Baggethun, E., Mingorría, S., Reyes-García, V., Calvet, L., & Montes, C. (2010). Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: Empirical study in the Doñana natural areas. Conservation Biology, 24(3), 721–729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.x
Hanazaki, N., Herbst, D. F., Marques, M. S., & Vandebroek, I. (2013). Evidence of the shifting baseline syndrome in ethnobotanical research. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-9-75
Hernández-Morcillo, M., Hoberg, J., Oteros-Rozas, E., Plieninger, T., Gómez-Baggethun, E., & Reyes-García, V. (2014). Traditional ecological knowledge in Europe: Status Quo and insights for the environmental policy agenda. Environment, 56(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00139157.2014.861673
Koster, R., Baccar, K., & Lemelin, R. H. (2012). Moving from research ON, to research with and for Indigenous communities: A critical reflection on community-based participatory research. Canadian Geographer, 56(2), 195–210. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1541-0064.2012.00428.x
Kovach, M. (2010). Conversational Method in Indigenous Research. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 14(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069060ar
Kovach, M. (2019). Indigenous Evaluation Frameworks: Can the Convention for the Safeguarding of the Intangible Cultural Heritage be a guide for recognizing Indigenous scholarship within tenure and promotion standards? AlterNative, 15(4), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180119887185
Kovach, M. (2020). Conversation Method in Indigenous Research. Fisrt Peoples Child & Family Review, 5(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.7202/1069060ar
Lee, S. M., Nichols, J. D., Lloyd, D., Sagari, S., Sagulu, F., Siregar, I. Z., Hartoyo, A. P. P., Henry, R., & Nurainas. (2021). The indigenous uses of plants from siberut, mentawai, indonesia. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 22(18), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.32859/ERA.22.18.1-33
Njau, A., Hakim, A., Lekson, A. S., & Setyowati, E. (2019). Local wisdom practices of Dayak Indigenous People in the management of tana’ulen in the Kayan Mentarang National Park of Malinau regency, North Kalimantan province, Indonesia. Russian Journal of Agricultural and Socio-Economics Sciences, 91(7), 156–167.
Noordwijk, M. van, Mulyoutami, E., Sakuntaladewi, N., & Agus, F. (2008). Swiddens in transition: Shifted perceptions on shifting cultivators in Indonesia. the World Agroforestry Centre, ICRAF Southeast Asia Regional Office.
Nopembereni, E. ., Sugiyanto, Sukesi, K., & Yuliati, Y. (2019). Local Wisdom in Shifting Cultivation Management of Dayak Ngaju Community, Central Kalimantan. Journal of Socioeconomics and Development, 2(1), 38–44. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.31328/jsed.v2i1.939
Okui, K., Sawada, Y., & Yoshida, T. (2021). “Wisdom of the Elders” or “Loss of Experience” as a Mechanism to Explain the Decline in Traditional Ecological Knowledge: A Case Study on Awaji Island, Japan. Human Ecology, 49(3), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-021-00237-w
Onyekwelu, J. C. (2021). Can the Fear of the Gods Sustain Biodiversity Conservation in Sacred Groves? ACADEMIA Letters Article 635. https://doi.org/10.20935/AL635
Onyekwelu, J. C., & Olusola, J. A. (2014). Role of sacred grove in in-situ biodiversity conservation in rainforest zone of south-western Nigeria. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 26(1), 5–15. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23617008
Parthasarathy, N., & Babu, K. . (2019). Sacred Groves: Potential for Biodiversity and Bioresource Management. In W. L. et al. Filho (Ed.), Life on Land, Encyclopedia of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (p. 15 pp). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-71065-5_10-1
Phungpracha, E., Kansuntisukmongko, K., & Panya, O. (2016). Traditional ecological knowledge in Thailand: Mechanisms and contributions to food security. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 37(2), 82–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.kjss.2015.07.001
Redvers, N. (2018). The Value of Global Indigenous Knowledge in Planetary Health. Challenges, 9(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe9020030
Redvers, N., Celidwen, Y., Schultz, C., Horn, O., Githaiga, C., Vera, M., Perdrisat, M., Mad Plume, L., Kobei, D., Kain, M. C., Poelina, A., Rojas, J. N., & Blondin, B. (2022). The determinants of planetary health: an Indigenous consensus perspective. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(2), 156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(21)00354-5
Rist, L., Shankeer, U. R., Milner-Gulland, E., & Gazhoul, J. (2010). The use of traditional ecological knowledge in forest management: An example from India. Ecology and Society, 15(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-03290-150103
Saini, M. (2013). Systematic Review of Western and Aboriginal Research Designs: Assessing Cross-Validation to explore compatibility and convergence. National Collaborating Centre for Aboriginal Health.
Schlüter, M., Haider, L. J., Lade, S. J., Lindkvist, E., Martin, R., Orach, K., Wijermans, N., & Folke, C. (2019). Capturing emergent phenomena in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 24(3), 1–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-13030-270131
Schmidt, M. V. C., Ikpeng, Y. U., Kayabi, T., Sanches, R. A., Ono, K. Y., & Adams, C. (2021). Indigenous Knowledge and Forest Succession Management in the Brazilian Amazon: Contributions to Reforestation of Degraded Areas. Frontiers in Forests and Global Change, 4(April), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2021.605925
Schroeder, H., & González, N. C. (2019). Bridging Knowledge Divides: The Case of Indigenous Ontologies of Territoriality and REDD+. Forest Policy and Economics, 100(March 2018), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.12.010
Snow, K. C., Hays, D. G., Caliwagan, G., Ford, D. J., Mariotti, D., Mwendwa, J. M., & Scott, W. E. (2016). Guiding principles for indigenous research practices. Action Research, 14(4), 357–375. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750315622542
Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participation observation. Holt, Rinehart, and Wilson.
Stocker, L., Collard, L., & Rooney, A. (2016). Aboriginal world views and colonisation: implications for coastal sustainability†. Local Environment, 21(7), 844–865. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2015.1036414
Su, K., Ren, J., Qin, Y., Hou, Y., & Wen, Y. (2020). Efforts of Indigenous Knowledge in Forest and Wildlife Conservation: A Case Study on Bulang People in Mangba Village in Yunnan Province, China. Forests, 11(1178), 1–16. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/f11111178
Tang, R., & Gavin, M. C. (2016). A classification of threats to traditional ecological knowledge and conservation responses. Conservation and Society, 14(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-4923.182799
Toombs, E., Drawson, A. S., Chambers, L., Bobinski, T. L. R., Dixon, J., & Mushquash, C. J. (2019). Moving towards an indigenous research process: A reflexive approach to empirical work with first nations communities in Canada. International Indigenous Policy Journal, 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.18584/IIPJ.2019. 10.1.6
Torres-Vitolas, C. A., Harvey, C. A., Cruz-Garcia, G. S., Vanegas-Cubillos, M., & Schreckenberg, K. (2019). The Socio-Ecological Dynamics of Food Insecurity among Subsistence-Oriented Indigenous Communities in Amazonia: a Qualitative Examination of Coping Strategies among Riverine Communities along the Caquetá River, Colombia. Human Ecology, 47(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-019-0074-7
Uchida, K., & Kamura, K. (2020). Traditional Ecological Knowledge Maintains Useful Plant Diversity in Semi-natural Grasslands in the Kiso Region, Japan. Environmental Management, 65(4), 478–489. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-020-01255-y
Wang, Z., Liu, J., Xu, N., Fan, C., Fan, Y., He, S., Jiao, L., & Ma, N. (2019). The role of indigenous knowledge in integrating scientific and indigenous knowledge for community-based disaster risk reduction: A case of Haikou Village in Ningxia, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 41, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101309
Wongvarn, M., & Amnuay-ngerntra, S. (2018). Karen indigenous knowledge of sustainable resource management. Prajñā Vihāra: Journal of Philosophy and Religion, 19(2), 1-1.
Copyright (c) 2023 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
