For Church or People: The History of Land Dispute in Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara Province from the Perspective of Tana' Ai Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v9i1.41906Keywords:
Political ecology, Land dispute, Tana' Ai community, Religious institution, Capital acumulationAbstract
This study employs a political ecology approach to analyze the dynamics of land ownership in Indonesia, focusing on the Tana' Ai community in Sikka Regency, East Nusa Tenggara province. We argue that agrarian change is driven by external actors, including private companies that religious institutions and government agencies own. The latter often impose their will on indigenous populations, which can result in land conflicts, marginalization, and uneven capital accumulation. In particular, the church's status as a land use permit holder from the colonial era complicates the Tana' Ai ethnic community's ability to assert its ancestral land rights. To understand this further, this study examines the interactions between the church, local communities, and the state in land management and their impact on the dynamics of power and resistance of ethnic Tana' Ai communities to social and policy change. We ask, is land managed by the community or the church? The research contributes to the growing body of literature. It fills a significant gap on land disputes in Indonesia, which also appear to be conducted by religious institutions, and the long-term impacts of such conflicts on indigenous societies. We used qualitative methods, including interviews, participant observation, and archival analysis, across 3 villages in Sikka Regency. This understanding is crucial for addressing the socio-political and cultural challenges the Tana' Ai community faces in reclaiming their land rights and ensuring their sustainable livelihoods.
References
Afiff, S. (2022). Antropologi dan Persoalan Perubahan Iklim: Perspektif Kritis Ekologi Politik. Jurnal Antropologi: Isu-Isu Sosial Budaya, 24(1), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.25077/jantro.v24.n1.p109-118.2022
Alava, H., & Shroff, C. (2019). Unravelling Church Land: Transformations in the Relations between Church, State, and Community in Uganda. Development and Change, 50(5), 1288–1309. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12503
Basyir, M. M. H. (2006). Masyarakat Adat Tana Ai Flores Timur. In Hutan untuk Masa Depan: Pengelolaan Hutan Adat di Tengah Arus Perubahan Dunia (pp. 226–264). AMAN & DTE.
Borras, S. M., & Franco, J. C. (2011). Global Land Grabbing and Trajectories of Agrarian Change: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(1), 34–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0366.2011.00339.x
Borras, S. M., Franco, J. C., & Suárez, S. M. (2018). Land and food sovereignty. In Holt-Gimenez, E., Alonso-Fradejas, A., Holmes, T., and Robbins, M. J. (Eds.), Food Sovereignty: Convergence and Contradictions, Condition and Challenges (pp. 170-187). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315227580-10
Blaikie, P. (1999). A Review of Political Ecology: Issues, Epistemology and Analytical Narratives. Zeitschrift fur Wirstschaftsgeofraphie, 43(1), 131-147. https://doi.org /10.1515/zfw.1999.0009
Bryant, R. L. (2021). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction (3rd Edition). Wiley.
Bryant, R. L., & Bailey, S. (1997). Third World Political Ecology. Routledge.
Budiman, A. (1990). Sistem Perekonomian Pancasila dan Ideologi Ilmu Sosial. Penerbit Gramedia Pustaka.
Budiman, I., & Pujiono, E. (2022). Customary Forest Development in Indonesia: Opportunity and Challenge (A Literature Review). The Japanese Forest Society Congress 133rd Annual JFS Meeting. The Japanese Forest Society. https://doi.org/10.11519/jfsc.133.0_1
Chigumira, E. (2018). Political Ecology of Agrarian Transformation: The Nexus of Mining and Agriculture in Sanyati District, Zimbabwe. Journal of Rural Studies, 61, 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.11.003
Dove, M. R. (2020). The Dialectical Forest: A Political Ecology of Climate Change and Forest Communities. Harvard University Press.
Forth, G. (2019). The Tiger and the Pangolin: Nature, Culture, and Conservation in Indonesia. University of Hawaii Press.
Franco, J., Borras, S., Fradejas, A. A., Buxton, N., Herre, R., Kay, S., & Fedoroff, T. (2013). The Global Land Grab: A Primer. The Transnational Institute (TNI)
Havlíček, T. (2018). Demarginalization and Church property: The case of Czechia. In Pelc, S., & Koderman, M. (Eds.), Nature, Tourism and Ethnicity as Drivers of (De) Marginalization: Insights to Marginality from Perspective of Sustainability and Development (pp. 235-242). Springer.
Hidayah, N. P., & Al-Fatih, S. (2019). Recognition and Strengthening the Customary Land Ownership in Central Borneo Province. Jurnal Hukum Novelty, 10(01), 11–22.
Howitt, R. (2009). Land Rights. In Kitchin, R., & Thrift, N. (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (pp. 118–123). Elsevier. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00964-0
Jon, H., Aswin, D., & Abdullah. (2022). Penyelesaian Konflik Tanah Eks Hak Guna Usaha. Jurnal Genesis Indonesia, 2(01), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.56741/jgi.v2i01.220
Kami, P. (2023). Karakteristik Nama Diri Masyarakat Tana Ai Kabupaten Sikka Berdasarkan Perspektif Linguistik Kebudayaan. Jurnal Ide Bahasa, 5(1), 91–102.
Kian, D. A., Rayawulan, R. M., Mberu, Y., & Lily, B. B. (2018). Makna Ruang Dalam Budaya Masyarakat Sikka. Jurnal Arsitektur KOMPOSISI, 12(2), 105–116.
Kuipers, J., & Fox, J. (1997). Origins, Ancestry, and Alliance: Explorations in Austronesian Ethnography. The Journal of Asian Studies, 56(4), 1163–1165. https://doi.org/10.2307/2658372
Lewis, E. (1998). The Tyranny of the Text Oral Tradition and the Power of Writing in. KITLV, 154(3), 457–477.
Lewis, E. D. (1989a). Origin Structures and Precedence in the Social Orders of Tana ’Ai and Sikka. In Fox, J. J., & Sather, C. (Eds.), Origins, Ancestry, and Alliance: Explorations in Austronesian Ethnography (pp. 157–177). ANU Press.
Lewis, E. D. (1989b). Word and Act in The Curing Rituals of The Ata Tana Ai of Flores. KITLV, 145(4), 490–501.
Li, T. M. (2001). Masyarakat Adat, Difference, and the Limits of Recognition in Indonesia’s Forest Zone. Modern Asian Studies, 35(3), 645–676. https://doi.org/ 10.1017/S0026749X01003067
Li, T. M. (2007). The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Duke University Press.
Maria, S. K. (2018). Wacana Tradisi Lisan Wawi Wotik di Kabupaten Sikka. Jurnal At-Tadbir STAI Darul Kamal NW Kembang Kerang, II(2), 24–38.
Northcott, H. A. (2012). Realization of the Right of Indigenous Peoples to Natural Resources Under International Law Through the Emerging Right to Autonomy. International Journal of Human Rights, 16(1), 73–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13642987.2011.611335
Olivia, M., Lering, M. E. D., Rimasi, & Naro, A. M. K. (2022). Analisis Perbedaan Verba Dialek Sikka Natar Dan Dialek Tana Ai Dalam Bahasa Sikka. Journal Scientific of Mandalika (JSM), 3(10), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.36312/10.36312/vol3iss10 pp19-22
Peluso, N. L. (2018). Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. University of California Press.
Peluso, N. L., & Watt, M. (Eds.) (2001). Violent Environments. Cornell Univeristy Press.
Prior, J. M. (2013). The church and land disputes: sobering thoughts from Flores. Chandratiya Research Center for the Study of Religion and Culture.
Reidy, P. E. (2024). Churching NIMBYs: Creating Affordable Housing on Church Property. The Yale Law Journal, 133(4), 1254–1334.
Robbins, P. (2012). Political Ecology: A Critical Introduction. Wiley-Blackwell.
Sitorus. (1998). Penelitian Kualitatif: Suatu Perkenalan. IPB.
Tolo, E. Y. S. (2016). Akumulasi Melalui Perampasan dan Kemiskinan di Flores. MASYARAKAT: Jurnal Sosiologi, 21(2), 173–204.
Wuryandari, G. (2014). Pengembangan Wilayah Nusa Tenggara Timur dari Perspektif Sosial: Permasalah dan Kebijakan. LIPI Press.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
