Nongovernmental Organizations in the Design and Implementation of Social Forestry Programs in Indonesia: Interests, Power and Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v9i2.43995Keywords:
Community forestry, Tenure reform, NGO, Interest group, Actors’ interest, IndonesiaAbstract
Many social forestry projects have failed to produce expected outcomes. In many cases, they do not suit specific local contexts, problems, and needs because they only articulate the interests of powerful actors outside local communities. In this study, we examine how nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) affect social forestry implementation. In many cases, NGOs are characterized as benevolent actors, often claiming to represent voiceless groups, including poor local communities, in the social forestry context. We are specifically interested in analyzing the ways by which the studied NGOs have shaped the implementation of social forestry models in the forests managed by the state company of Perhutani. We focus on how the NGOs operate and their motivation and strategies nuanced around their power relations vis-à-vis the state company, how they have been shaped and readjusted. We found that due to competition for funding some of the analyzed NGOs were ably persuaded to alter their initial idealistic motivation of serving the best interests of local communities, while the others were simply motivated by financial self-gains from the resource-full state company. Even when the central government pushed the company to implement an innovative scheme, with greater rights and access granted to local communities, NGOs continued to favor the company’s interest by successfully persuading locals to continue with the old social forestry scheme. The study findings enhance the growing literature on the diverse roles of NGOs as interest groups in forest/environmental policies beyond the old characterization.
References
Adi, N. J., Arganata, F., Chehafudin, M., Fuad, F. H., Nugraheni, S. C. A., Sanyoto, R., Soriaga, R., & Walpole, P. (2004). Communities Transforming Forestlands: Java Indonesia. Asia Forest Network.
Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World development, 29(10), 1649-1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0 305-750X(01)00063-8
Anderson, J., Mehta, S., Epelu, E., & Cohen, B. (2015). Managing leftovers: Does community forestry increase secure and equitable access to valuable resources for the rural poor?. Forest Policy and Economics, 58, 47-55. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.004
Andriyana, W., & Hogl, K. (2019). Decentralization drivers beyond legal provisions: The case of collaborative forest management in Java Island. Forests, 10(8), 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/f10080685
Banks, N., Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (2015). NGOs, states, and donors revisited: Still too close for comfort?. World development, 66, 707-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. worlddev.2014.09.028
Bakker, L., Moniaga, S. (2010). The Space Between: Land Claims and the Law in Indonesia. Asian Journal of Social Science, 38 (2), 187-203. https://doi.org/ 10.1163/156853110X490890
Barnes, C., & Van Laerhoven, F. (2015). Making it last? Analysing the role of NGO interventions in the development of institutions for durable collective action in Indian community forestry. Environmental Science & Policy, 53, 192-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.06.008
Barr, C. M., Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Dermawan, A., McCarthy, J., Moeliono, M., & Setiono, B. (Eds.). (2006). Decentralization of forest administration in Indonesia: Implications for forest sustainability, economic development, and community livelihoods. CIFOR.
Barsimantov, J. A. (2010). Vicious and virtuous cycles and the role of external non-government actors in community forestry in Oaxaca and Michoacán, Mexico. Human Ecology, 38(1), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-009-9289-3
Bastakoti, R. R., & Davidsen, C. (2014). REDD+ and forest tenure security: concerns in Nepal’s community forestry. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 21(2), 168-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2013.8 79542
Bikkina, N., & Sarin, A. (2013). Sajjata Sangh: A Network of NGOs. Indian Institute of Management. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473994119
Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1997). World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American sociological review, 171-190. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315260143-12
Bowler, D. E., Buyung-Ali, L. M., Healey, J. R., Jones, J. P., Knight, T. M., & Pullin, A. S. (2012). Does community forest management provide global environmental benefits and improve local welfare?. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(1), 29-36. https://doi.org/10.1890/110040
Bryant, R. L. (2002). False prophets? Mutant NGOs and Philippine environmentalism. Society & Natural Resources, 15(7), 629-639. https://doi. org/10.1080/08941920290069236
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th Edition). Oxford University Press.
Cook, N. J., Wright, G. D., & Andersson, K. P. (2017). Local politics of forest governance: Why NGO support can reduce local government responsiveness. World Development, 92, 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2016.12.005
Denzin, N. (1970). Strategies of multiple triangulation. The research act in sociology: A theoretical introduction to sociological method, 297(1970), 313.
Diantoro, T. D., Purwanto, A. B., Ferdaus, R. M., Suprapto, E. (2014). Kaburnya Kemitraan PHBM dan Harapan Kejelasan ke Depan oleh Permenhut P.39/Menhut-II/2013 tentang Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Setempat Melalui Kemitraan Kehutanan. Policy Paper No. 14. ARuPA.
Dupuy, K. E., Ron, J., & Prakash, A. (2015). Who survived? Ethiopia's regulatory crackdown on foreign-funded NGOs. Review of International Political Economy, 22(2), 419-456. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2014.903854
Duthy, S., & Bolo-Duthy, B. (2003). Empowering people’s organizations in community based forest management in the Philippines: The community organizing role of NGOs. Annals of Tropical Research, 25(2), 13-27.
Essougong, U.P.K., Foundjem-Tita, D., Minang, P.A., 2019. Addressing equity in community forestry: Lessons from 20 years of implementation in cameroon. Ecol. Soc. 24. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10656-240109
Eversole, R. (2016). Here to Help: NGOs Combating Poverty in Latin America: NGOs Combating Poverty in Latin America. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/978 1315703732
Fisher, M. R., Moeliono, M., Mulyana, A., Yuliani, E. L., Adriadi, A., Judda, J., & Sahide, M. A. K. (2018). Assessing the new social forestry project in Indonesia: recognition, livelihood and conservation?. International Forestry Review, 20(3), 346-361. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818824063014
Gilmour, D. (2016). Forty years of community-based forestry: A review of its extent and effectiveness. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).
Gooding, K. (2017). The role of NGOs’ service delivery experience in developing relevant research agendas: experience and challenges among NGOs in Malawi. Health research policy and systems, 15(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-017-0199-3
Gupta, D., & Koontz, T. M. (2019). Working together? Synergies in government and NGO roles for community forestry in the Indian Himalayas. World Development, 114, 326-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.016
Harada, K., Habib, M., Sakata, Y., & Maryudi, A. (2022). The role of NGOs in recognition and sustainable maintenance of customary forests within indigenous communities: The case of Kerinci, Indonesia. Land use policy, 113, 105865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105865
Hasnaoui, A., & Krott, M. (2019). Forest governance and the Arab spring: A case study of state forests in Tunisia. Forest policy and economics, 105, 99-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.04.016
Hasyim, Z., Laraswati, D., Purwanto, R. H., Pratama, A. A., & Maryudi, A. (2020). Challenges facing independent monitoring networks in the Indonesian timber legality assurance system. Forest Policy and Economics, 111, 102025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102025
Ismariana, E., Kusuma, A.F., Permadi, D.B., Kartodihardjo, H., Santoso, W.B., Maryudi, A., Corruption in Social Forestry in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 8(2), 443-463. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v8i2.34782
Kazi, S., & Analoui, F. (2019). Parameters of managerial effectiveness and development of third sector managers: An empirical study of HIV/AIDS NGO managers in India. Working Paper No. 02. Bradford.
Khieng, S., & Dahles, H. (2015). Resource dependence and effects of funding diversification strategies among NGOs in Cambodia. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 26(4), 1412-1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9485-7
Krott, M. (2005). Forest Policy Analysis, Forest Policy Analysis. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3485-7
Krott, M., Bader, A., Schusser, C., Devkota, R., Maryudi, A., Giessen, L., & Aurenhammer, H. (2014). Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest policy and economics, 49, 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.012
Kurniasih, H., Ford, R. M., Keenan, R. J., & King, B. (2021). The evolution of community forestry through the growth of interlinked community institutions in Java, Indonesia. World development, 139, 105319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worldd ev.2020.105319
Kusuma, A. F., Sahide, M. A. K., Purwanto, R. H., Ismariana, E., Santoso, W. B., Wulandari, E., & Maryudi, A. (2023). Emergent institutional issues from new tenure reforms and social-forestry initiatives in Indonesia: notes from the field. Forest and Society, 7(2), 450-466. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v7i2. 28319
Laraswati, D., Krott, M., Soraya, E., Rahayu, S., Fisher, M. R., Giessen, L., & Maryudi, A. (2022). Nongovernmental organizations as interest groups and their roles in policy processes: Insights from Indonesian forest and environmental governance. Forest and Society, 6(2), 570-589. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6 i2.19125
Laraswati, D., Rahayu, S., Sahide, M. A., Soraya, E., Pratama, A. A., Fisher, M., & Maryudi, A. (2020). The anachronistic category of non-government organisations: moving from normative to empirical-based definitions for identifying organized interest groups in forest policymaking. Forest Policy and Economics, 112, 102106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102106
LSM Lesehan. (2003). Langkah Baru Petani Hutan Bringin. LSM Lesehan.
Lukas, M. C., & Peluso, N. L. (2020). Transforming the classic political forest: Contentious territories in Java. Antipode, 52(4), 971-995. https://doi.org/10.11 11/anti.12563
Martens, K. (2002). Mission impossible? Defining nongovernmental organizations. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 13(3), 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020341526691
Maryudi, A., & Fisher, M. R. (2020). The power in the interview: A practical guide for identifying the critical role of actor interests in environment research. Forest and Society, 4(1), 142-150. http://dx.doi.org/10.24259/fs.v4i1.9132
Maryudi, A., Sahide, M. A. K., Daulay, M. H., Yuniati, D., Syafitri, W., Sadiyo, S., & Fisher, M. R. (2022). Holding social forestry hostage in Indonesia: Contested bureaucracy mandates and potential escape pathways. Environmental Science & Policy, 128, 142-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.11.013
Mcdermott, M. H., & Schreckenberg, K. (2009). Equity in community forestry: insights from North and South. International Forestry Review, 11(2), 157-170. https://doi.org/10.1505/ifor.11.2.157
McDougall, C., Jiggins, J., Pandit, B. H., Thapa Magar Rana, S. K., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). Does adaptive collaborative forest governance affect poverty? Participatory action research in Nepal's community forests. Society & Natural Resources, 26(11), 1235-1251. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2013. 779344
Meijaard, E., Santika, T., Wilson, K. A., Budiharta, S., Kusworo, A., Law, E. A., ... & Struebig, M. J. (2021). Toward improved impact evaluation of community forest management in Indonesia. Conservation Science and Practice, 3(1), e189. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.189
Mitlin, D., Hickey, S., & Bebbington, A. (2007). Reclaiming development? NGOs and the challenge of alternatives. World development, 35(10), 1699-1720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.11.005
Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Bong, I. W., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social Forestry-why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2. 2484
Okamoto, S. (2001). The movement and activities of environmental NGOs in Indonesia. Policy Trend Report, 2001, 13-23.
Ostrom, E. (2010). Analyzing collective action. Agricultural economics, 41, 155-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x
Ota, M. (2019). From joint forest management to more smallholder-based community forestry: prospects and challenges in Java, Indonesia. Journal of Forest Research, 24(6), 371-375. https://doi.org/10.1080/13416979.2019.1685063
Peluso, N. L. (2023). Rich forests, poor people: Resource control and resistance in Java. University of California Press.
Peluso, N. L., & Vandergeest, P. (2001). Genealogies of the political forest and customary rights in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Thailand. The Journal of Asian Studies, 60(3), 761-812. https://doi.org/10.2307/2700109
Radjawali, I., Pye, O., & Flitner, M. (2019). Recognition through reconnaissance? Using drones for counter-mapping in Indonesia. Journal of Peasant Study, 44(4), 817–833. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1264937
Ragandhi, A., Hadna, A. H., Setiadi, S., & Maryudi, A. (2021). Why do greater forest tenure rights not enthuse local communities? An early observation on the new community forestry scheme in state forests in Indonesia. Forest and Society, 5(1), 159-166. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i1.11723
Rahayu, S., Laraswati, D., Permadi, D. B., Sahide, M. A., & Maryudi, A. (2023). Only a noise? The role of non-governmental organizations in the policy processes of a new social forestry model in Indonesia. Small-Scale Forestry, 22(2), 253-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-022-09525-9
Rahayu, S., Laraswati, D., Pratama, A. A., Sahide, M. A., Permadi, D. B., Wibowo, W., ... & Maryudi, A. (2020). Bureaucratizing non-government organizations as governmental forest extension services in social forestry policy in Indonesia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 29(2), 119-129. 29, 119–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2020.1753585
Ramdani, R., & Lounela, A. K. (2020). Palm oil expansion in tropical peatland: Distrust between advocacy and service environmental NGOs. Forest Policy and Economics, 118, 102242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102242
Resosudarmo, I. A. P., Tacconi, L., Sloan, S., Hamdani, F. A. U., Alviya, I., & Muttaqin, M. Z. (2019). Indonesia's land reform: Implications for local livelihoods and climate change. Forest policy and economics, 108, 101903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. forpol.2019.04.007
Riddell, R. C., Robinson, M., Coninck, J. D., Muir, A., & White, S. (1995). Non—Governmental Organizations and Rural Poverty Alleviation. Oxford University Press.
Safa, M. S. (2006). The role of NGOs in improving social forestry practice: Do they promote livelihood, sustainability and optimal land use in Bangladesh?. Small-scale Forest Economics, Management and Policy, 5(2), 207-229. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-006-0011-7
Sahide, M. A. K., Fisher, M. R., Supratman, S., Yusran, Y., Pratama, A. A., Maryudi, A., ... & Kim, Y. S. (2020). Prophets and profits in Indonesia's social forestry partnership schemes: Introducing a sequential power analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 115, 102160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102160
Santika, T., Wilson, K. A., Budiharta, S., Kusworo, A., Meijaard, E., Law, E. A., ... & Struebig, M. J. (2019). Heterogeneous impacts of community forestry on forest conservation and poverty alleviation: Evidence from Indonesia. People and Nature, 1(2), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.25
Scheba, A., & Mustalahti, I. (2015). Rethinking ‘expert’knowledge in community forest management in Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics, 60, 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2014.12.007
Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2014). The business firm as a political actor: A new theory of the firm for a globalized world. Business & society, 53(2), 143-156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313511778
Schusser, C., Krott, M., Movuh, M. C. Y., Logmani, J., Devkota, R. R., Maryudi, A., ... & Bach, N. D. (2015). Powerful stakeholders as drivers of community forestry—Results of an international study. Forest Policy and Economics, 58, 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.05.011
Setiahadi, R. (2012). Modal Sosial dalam Pembangunan Kehutanan: Penyelesaian Deforestasi dan Konflik PHBM di Kabupaten Ngawi. Universitas Gadjah Mada.
Setiahadi, R., Pratiwi, D., & Ratnaningtyas, D. (2017). Deliberation process analysis of community based forest management policies implementation in Indonesia. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology, 7(3), 1076-1082. https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.7.3. 2127
Stanzel, J., Krott, M., & Schusser, C. (2020). Power alliances for biodiversity—Results of an international study on community forestry. Land Use Policy, 97, 102963.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.09.038
Stirrat, R. L., & Henkel, H. (1997). The development gift: The problem of reciprocity in the NGO world. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 554(1), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716297554001005
Suharjito, D. (2018, November). Dramaturgy of agrarian reform in forestry sector in java Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 196 (1), 012046. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/196/1/012046
Susilowati, S. (2015). Konflik Tenurial dan Sengketa Tanah Kawasan Hutan yang Dikelola oleh Perum Perhutani. Jurnal Repertorium, 3, 143–151.
Torres-Rojo, J. M., Moreno-Sánchez, R., & Amador-Callejas, J. (2019). Effect of capacity building in alleviating poverty and improving forest conservation in the communal forests of Mexico. World Development, 121, 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.04.016
Ungirwalu, A., Mansoben, J. R., Runtuboi, Y. Y., Fatem, S. M., Peday, M. H., Marwa, J., & Maryudi, A. (2025). The fall of the kings: Power relations and dynamics in Papua's indigenous community in forest resource management. Forest Policy And Economics, 172, 103424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2025.103424
Widyaningsih, T. S., Darwin, M. M., Pangaribowo, E. H., & Maryudi, A. (2022). Harnessing social innovations and mobilizing networks for improving local livelihoods: cases of two community-managed forests from Indonesia. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 31(1), 27-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2021.2018668
Wulandari, C., & Inoue, M. (2018). The Importance of social learning for the development of community based forest management in Indonesia: The case of community forestry in Lampung Province. Small-scale Forestry, 17(3), 361-376. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-018-9392-7
Yadav, B. D., Bigsby, H., & MacDonald, I. (2015). How can poor and disadvantaged households get an opportunity to become a leader in community forestry in Nepal?. Forest Policy and Economics, 52, 27-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forp ol.2014.11.010
Yuwono, T., & Putro, W. T. (2008). Cooperative Forest Management: Potret Pengelolaan Hutan Kabupaten Ngawi di Era Otonomi Daerah. Datamedia.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
