Maritime Sector As A Barometer Of Surabaya's Second Progress In Indonesia With The Spirit Of Building Starting From The Periphery
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The importance of the socio-economic dimension of the utilization of marine potential in an area, with the existence of various regulations and technological developments, both regarding the technology of marine potential utilization tools and technology to develop and preserve the Marine potential itself, so that it can be utilized as much as possible for Prosperity. Contribution to fill the gap with socio-economic assessment of the utilization of the maritime sector of Surabaya city can be done by several steps, namely creating a” framework " for the maritime economy, then collecting and classifying socio-economic indicators that are comparable to be reliable in the maritime world. The Data obtained will allow us to assess the size of the maritime sector of the city of Surabaya and its position in the maritime claster framework made by both the provincial and central governments, as well as discuss the suitability of the strategy to form a claster at the National vs. transnational level. The results show the difference between Central and local government policies, at least at the level of implementation, expanding knowledge about marine potential that will allow to design strategies that address the real issues of marine potential utilization policies so that they become effective.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Allow anyone to modify, improve, and make derivative works, even for commercial purposes, as long as they credit to you for the original work.
Accepted 2025-05-11
Published 2025-06-22
References
[1] Andriani, R. (2021). Keterkaitan desa-kota dalam aktivitas minapolitan di Kabupaten Malang. Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah & Desa, 5(3), 143-155. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/p2wd/article/download/28443/19070
[2] Arifin, Z. (2019). Keamanan maritim dan implikasi kebijakannya bagi Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Politik, 7(2), 98-112. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jsp/article/view/10970/8211
[3] Bahri, S., & Hakim, L. (2020). Pengembangan kawasan pesisir berbasis rumput laut di Kabupaten Sumbawa Barat. Jurnal Ilmu Kelautan Tropis, 11(1), 45-58. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnalikt/article/download/9816/7695
[4] Fitriani, N., & Wahyuni, D. (2021). Kajian sebaran potensi ekonomi sumber daya kelautan di Pantai Selatan Yogyakarta. Teknosains: Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi, 14(3), 200-215. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/teknosains/article/download/7953/6153
[5] Hidayat, A. (2022). Literasi maritim: Meningkatkan kesadaran dan pemahaman masyarakat terhadap sektor kemaritiman. Jurnal Agro-Maritim, 9(2), 112-125. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/agro-maritim/article/download/53644/27498
[6] Irawan, R., & Nugroho, S. (2021). Model pemberdayaan wilayah pesisir dalam menghadapi masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN. Jurnal Manajemen & Hukum, 8(1), 65-79. https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jmh/article/download/16728/11021
[7] Mustofa, H. (2020). Diskursus pembangunan poros maritim dunia: Analisis wacana kritis terhadap kebijakan kelautan Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Maritim dan Perikanan, 7(1), 55-70. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnalkmp/article/download/25122/16326
[8] Rahmawati, D., & Suhendar, T. (2021). Strategi peningkatan produksi agroindustri perikanan di Kabupaten Banyumas. Jurnal Manajemen Agribisnis, 12(4), 300-312. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jmagr/article/download/8455/6605
[9] Suryanto, B., & Alamsyah, R. (2022). Strategi peningkatan efektivitas pengelolaan kawasan konservasi laut di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Kelautan Tropis, 13(2), 155-169. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jurnalikt/article/download/29262/20394
[10] Yusron, E., & Prasetyo, W. (2019). Kompetensi nakhoda kapal rawai tuna di Palabuhanratu. Jurnal Perikanan dan Sumber Daya Perairan, 5(3), 85-97. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jpsp/article/view/17538/12575
[11] Porter, M. E. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77-90.
[12] Breschi, S., & Malerba, F. (2001). The geography of innovation and economic clustering: some introductory notes. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 817-833.
[13] Asheim, B. T., & Gertler, M. S. (2005). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (pp. 291-317). Oxford University Press.
[14] Doloreux, D., & Melançon, Y. (2008). On the dynamics of innovation in Quebec's coastal maritime industry. Technovation, 28(4), 231-243.
[15] Bathelt, H., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31-56.
[16] Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: the open method of co-ordination in innovation policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 249-266.
[17] Isaksen, A., & Hauge, E. (2002). Regional clusters in Europe. Observatory of European SMEs, 3, 1-67.
[18] OECD. (2005). Building competitive regions: Strategies and governance. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
[19] Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6-7), 549-578.]
[20] Gordon, I. R., & McCann, P. (2000). Industrial clusters: Complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks?. Urban Studies, 37(3), 513-532.