Critical Approaches to GIS and Spatial Mapping in Indonesia Forest Management and Conservation

Authors

  • Asrul Sidiq Australian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.10921

Keywords:

spatial planning, land use mapping, forest policy

Abstract

The conventional Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and spatial mapping techniques fail to understand a spatially complex forest area. This is because forest landscapes cannot be easily mapped into a two-dimensional map, which is usually used in spatial planning. In addition, planning maps are the fundamental factors of land grabbing issues. To solve this problem, counter-mapping arises at the local level as a tool to overcome the problem of land grabbing in forest areas in Indonesia. Counter mapping is defined here as part of a broader term under participatory mapping or citizen mapping. However, counter-mapping also faces critiques in terms of different epistemological and socio-economic-political conditions at the local level. This article elaborates the use of GIS and spatial mapping methods within a 'critical' social science approach based on literature review and field experiences. This article also aims to analyze counter-mapping as a ‘tool’ to solve the forest land-use problem, which can contribute to the choice of policy instruments in forest management and conservation in Indonesia.

References

Appanah, S. (2016). Forest landscape restoration for Asia-Pacific forests. RECOFTC. Retrieved from https://www.recoftc.org/publications/0000150

Ardiansyah, F., Marthen, A. A., & Amalia, N. (2015). Forest and land-use governance in a decentralized Indonesia: A legal and policy review (Vol. 132). CIFOR. https://doi.org/10.17528/cifor/005695

Astuti, R., & McGregor, A. (2017). Indigenous land claims or green grabs? Inclusions and exclusions within forest carbon politics in Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(2), 445-466. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1197908

Burrough, P. A., McDonnell, R., McDonnell, R. A., & Lloyd, C. D. (2015). Principles of geographical information systems. Oxford university press.

Cockburn, J., Cundill, G., Shackleton, S., & Rouget, M. (2018). Towards place-based research to support social–ecological stewardship. Sustainability, 10(5), 1434. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051434

De Royer, S., Van Noordwijk, M., & Roshetko, J. M. (2018). Does community-based forest management in Indonesia devolve social justice or social costs?. International Forestry Review, 20(2), 167-180. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554818823767609

McCarthy, J. F. (2007). The Demonstration Effect: Natural Resources, Ethnonationalism and the Aceh Conflict. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 28(3), 314–33. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2007.00304.x

McGregor, A., Weaver, S., Challies, E., Howson, P., Astuti, R., & Haalboom, B. (2014). Practical critique: Bridging the gap between critical and practice‐oriented REDD+ research communities. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 55(3), 277-291. https://doi.org/10.1111/apv.12064

Moeliono, M., Thuy, P. T., Bong, I. W., Wong, G. Y., & Brockhaus, M. (2017). Social Forestry-why and for whom? A comparison of policies in Vietnam and Indonesia. Forest and Society, 1(2), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v1i2.2484

Nietschmann, B. (1995). Defending the Miskito Reefs with maps and GPS: mapping with sail, scuba, and satellite. Cultural survival quarterly, 18(4), 34-37.

Peluso, N. L. (1995). Whose woods are these? Counter‐mapping forest territories in Kalimantan, Indonesia. Antipode, 27(4), 383-406. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1995.tb00286.x

Peet, R. & Watts, M. (2004). Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements. Routledge.

Radjawali, I., Pye, O., & Flitner, M. (2017). Recognition through reconnaissance? Using drones for counter-mapping in Indonesia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 44(4), 817-833. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1264937

Robbins, P. (2011). Political ecology: A critical introduction. John Wiley & Sons.

Robinson, L.W., Ontiri, E., Alemu, T., & Moiko, S.S. (2017). Transcending landscapes: Working across scales and levels in pastoralist rangeland governance. Environmental Management, 60(2), 185-199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0870-z

Roth, R. (2007). Two-dimensional maps in multi-dimensional worlds: A case of community-based mapping in Northern Thailand. Geoforum, 38(1), 49-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2006.05.005

Setyowati, A. B. (2020). Making territory and negotiating citizenship in a climate mitigation initiative in Indonesia. Development and Change, 51(1), 144-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12541

Van Oosten, C., Gunarso, P., Koesoetjahjo, I., & Wiersum, F. (2014). Governing forest landscape restoration: Cases from Indonesia. Forests, 5(6), 1143-1162. https://doi.org/10.3390/f5061143

World Bank. (2020). Indonesia: Systematic country diagnostic update. The World Bank Group. https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/en/717421594076964759/pdf/Indonesia-ystematic-Country-Diagnostic-Update.pdf

Additional Files

Published

2021-06-04

Issue

Section

Applications of remote sensing technology for forest management and conservation

Categories

How to Cite

Critical Approaches to GIS and Spatial Mapping in Indonesia Forest Management and Conservation. (2021). Forest and Society, 5(2), 190-195. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v5i2.10921

Similar Articles

1-10 of 215

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.