The Good Life: Agriculture Transformation and the Pursuance of Goals in Two Rural Villages of Northeastern Thailand
Additional Files
Agricultural transformation of the developing world encompasses a broad set of subjects, usually revolving around the change in the mode of production and related aspects of production. However, the extent to which the transformation shapes subjective wellbeing is largely under explored. This paper examines how the constructed life goals of local people are shaped by the process of agricultural transformation and how they strive to attain wellbeing. We are especially interested in the ways rural dynamics are changing as a result. The empirical data is based on a two-village study using qualitative methods. The good life of rural people is classified into five types of life goals, including good health, decent quality of education and future employment opportunity for youth, good family relationships, having enough for living and eating, and self-sufficiency. Good health encompasses both the strength of the physical body and spiritual. The agricultural transformation has emerged new challenges to health, particularly the chemical use in agriculture that deteriorated the quality of the environment. The decent quality of education and future employment are attributed to education qualification and jobs with monthly salary. The high competition and the lack of social and political networks have lowered the expectation of rural people from getting government jobs. The transformation resulted in sprit types of family due to migration, while rural people remain highly valued good family relationships, in which modern technology such as cell phone play a part in maintaining distance interaction and good relations. Having enough for eating and living reflects the high priority that rural people giving on foods and housing. This is associated with the growing indebtedness that is threatening the loss of lands and property that are used for debt collateral. Finally, the self-sufficiency that was initiated by King Bhumipol is seen and adopted as a promising means to achieve a good life, however, self-sufficiency is variously defined.
Aristotle, A. (1975). The Nicomachean Ethics. (H.G. Apostle, Trans.). D. Reidel Publishing.
Boesen, J. (2007). On peasantry and the ‘modes of production debate’. Review of African Political Economy, 6(15-16), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/03056247908 703406
Camfield, L., Guillen-Royo, M., & Velazco, J. (2010). Does needs satisfaction matter for psychological and subjective wellbeing in developing countries: A mixed-methods illustration from Bangladesh and Thailand. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 11(4), 497-516. https://doi: 10.1007/s10902-009-9154-5
Chaipattana Foundation. (n.d.). Philosophy of Sufficiency Economy. The Chaipattana Foundation. Accessed from https://www.chaipat.or.th/eng/concepts-theories/sufficiency-economy-new-theory.html
Chambers, R. & Conway, D. (1991). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: Practical Concepts for the 21st Century. IDS Discussion Paper No. 261. Institute of Development Studies (IDS).
Chayanov, A. V. (1966). The Theory of Peasant Economy. D. Thorner, B. Kerblay & R. E. F. (Eds.). R. D. Irwin Inc.
Choenkwan, S. & Fisher, M. (2018). Introduction to the special section: Agrarian transformation in Thailand - Commodities, landscapes, and livelihoods. Forest and Society, 2(2), 112-120. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v2i2.5356
Department for International Development (DFID). (1999). Sustainable Livelihoods Guidance Sheets. Department for International Development (DFID). Retrieved from https://www.livelihoodscentre.org/-/sustainable-livelihoods-guidance-sheets
de Jong. E., Knipenberg, L., Ayuwat, D. & Promphakping, B. (2012). Red-Shirt Hartland: Village Level Socioeconomic Change in Northeast Thailand between 1999-2008. Asian Politics & Policy. 4 (2), 213-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1943-0787.2012.01337.x
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective Well-Being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542
Doyal, L. and Gough, I., (1991). A Theory of Human Need. Macmillan.
Fischer, E. (2014). The Good Life: Aspiration, Dignity, and the Anthropology of Wellbeing. Stanford University Press.
Fuller, T. D., Kumnuansilpa, P., Lightfoot, P. & Rattanamongkolmas, S. (1985). Migration and Development in Modern Thailand. Bangkok: Social Sciences Association of Thailand. Journal of Asian Studies, 44 (3), 668-670. https://doi.org/10.2307/ 2056337
Hirsch, P. (2012). Reviving Agrarian Studies in South-East Asia: Geography on the Ascendancy. Geography Research, 50(4), 393-403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j. 1745-5871.2012.00779.x
Kahn, J. S. (1985). Peasant Ideologies in the Third World. Annual Review of Anthropology, 14(1), 49-75. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.an.14.100185. 000405
Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. The Manchester School, 22(2), 139-191. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9957. 1954.tb00021.x
Manorom, T. & Promphakping, B., (2015). Measuring Well-Being from Local Perspective: The Case of Lao PDR. Social Indicators Research, 123(2), 391-409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0743-2
McGregor, J.A. (2007). Researching Wellbeing: From Concepts to Methodology. In Gough, I. & McGregor, J.A. (Eds.), Wellbeing in Developing Countries: From Theory to Research. (pp. 316-350). Cambridge University Press.
Mongsawad, P., (2010). The philosophy of sufficiency economy: a contribution to the theory of development. Asia-Pacific Development Journal, 17(1), 123-143. https://doi.org/10.18356/02bd5fb3-en
Penot, E., Theriez, M., Michel, I., Tongkaemkaew, U. & Chambon, B. (2022). Agroforestry Rubber Networks and Farmers Groups in Phatthalung Area in Southern Thailand: A Potential for An Innovation Platform?. Forest and Society, 6(2), 503-526. https://doi.org/10.24259/fs.v6i2.12481
Phatharathananunth, S., (2016). Rural transformations and democracy in Northeast Thailand. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(3), 504-519. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/00472336.2016.1166258
Poapongsakorn, N., Chalamwong, Y. & Lathapipat, D. (2012). The development of a better linkage between the education system and the labor market [in Thai]. In V. Panich (Chair), Revamping Thai Education System: Quality for All. Centara Grand & Bangkok Convention Center at Central World.
Podhisita, C., (2017). Household dynamics, the capitalist economy and agricultural change in rural Thailand. Southeast Asian Studies, 6(2), 247-273. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.6.2_247
Promphakping, B., Somaboot, P., Mee-Udon, F., Rattanaprathum, N., Weeranakin, P., Promphakping, N. & Suparatanagool, S. (2021), Using life goals to explore subjective well-being of people in northeast Thailand. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(9-10), 949-962. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-06-2020-0219
Promphakping, N., Thongyou, M. & Chamruspanth, V. (2017). The extension of state power and negotiations of the villagers in Northeast Thailand. Southeast Asian Studies, 6(3), 405-422. https://doi.org/10.20495/seas.6.3_405
Rigg, J., Phongsiri, M., Promphakping, B., Salamanca, A. & Sripun, M. (2020). Who will tend the farm? Interrogating the ageing Asian farmer. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 47(2), 306-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1572605
Rigg, J., Promphakping, B. & Mare, A. L. (2014). Personalizing the Middle-Income Trap: An Inter-Generational Migrant View from Rural Thailand. World Development, 59, 184-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.031
Rigg, J., Salamanca, A. & Parnwell, M. (2012). Joining the Dots of Agrarian Change in Asia: A 25 Year View from Thailand. World Development, 40(7), 1469-1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.03.001
Robeyns, I. (2005). The capacity approach: A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1080/146498805200034266
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L., (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist. 55(1), 68-78. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Scott, J. C. (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press.
Sen, A., (1993). Capability and Well-being. In Nussbaum, M & Sen, A. (Eds.), The Quality of Life (pp. 30-53). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/01982879 76.003.0003
Sen, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A Framework for Analysis. IDS Working Paper No. 72. Institute of Development Studies (IDS).
Shirai, Y., Fox, J., Leisz, S. J., Fukui, H. A., Rambo, A.T. (2017). The influence of local non-farm employment on rural household structure in Northeast Thailand. Journal of Rural Studies, (54), 52-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.06.003
Sondergaard, L. M. (2015). Thailand-Wanted: a quality education for all (English). Working Paper No. AUS 1333. World Bank Group. Retrieved from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/941121468113685895/Thailand-Wanted-a-quality-education-for-all
Thanapornpan, R. (1983). Are Thai Farmers Economic Animal: The exploration of the state of knowledge of rice supplies to the change of market prices [In Thai]. Thammasat Economic Journal, 1(2), 148-188.
Tsimihodimos, V., Gonzalez-Villapando, C., Meigs, J. b. & Ferrannini, E. (2018). Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus: Coprediction and Time Trajectories. Hypertension, (71), 422-428. https://doi.org/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA. 117.10546
Walker, A., (2007, January 10). Sufficiency economy = poverty? New Mandala. Accessed from https://www.newmandala.org/sufficiency-economy-poverty/
Copyright (c) 2023 Forest and Society
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This is an open access journal which means that all contents is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles in this journal without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Submission of an article implies that the work described has not been published previously (except in the form of an abstract or as part of a published lecture or academic thesis), that it is not under consideration for publication elsewhere, that its publication is approved by all authors and tacitly or explicitly by the responsible authorities where the work was carried out, and that, if accepted, will not be published elsewhere in the same form, in English or in any other language, without the written consent of the Publisher. An article based on a section from a completed graduate dissertation may be published in Forest and Society, but only if this is allowed by author's(s') university rules. The Editors reserve the right to edit or otherwise alter all contributions, but authors will receive proofs for approval before publication.
Forest and Society operates a CC-BY 4.0 © license for journal papers. Copyright remains with the author, but Forest and Society is licensed to publish the paper, and the author agrees to make the article available with the CC-BY 4.0 license. Reproduction as another journal article in whole or in part would be plagiarism. Forest and Society reserves all rights except those granted in this copyright notice
